Lessons from the field: Isn't it just common sense? Naïve realism as a barrier to learning
Open accessAbstract
Objective: The goal was to determine whether or not there is an association between the belief that human development and family science (HDFS) is “just common sense” and academic performance in a rigorous research methods class in HDFS. Background: Naïve realism is a cognitive bias that creates a belief in common sense that is difficult to challenge. It is unknown whether student commitment to common sense impedes students' ability to learn. Method: Students (N = 112) in an HDFS research methods class were followed for a semester. Potential barriers to learning were measured through a self‐report survey before the start of the semester. The outcome variable was objective performance in the course as measured by exam scores. Results: Exam scores were positively correlated with prior academic achievement and negatively correlated with student belief that the discipline is just common sense. Conclusion: Naïve realism, expressed as the belief that HDFS is just common sense, predicts poor performance in a research methods class. Implications: Higher education faculty in HDFS must directly confront the problem that our discipline is perceived as just common sense. Naïve realism must be challenged directly in coursework if students are to learn about the science of HDFS.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
In an undergraduate human development and family science (HDFS) research methods course, students who believed HDFS is “just common sense” performed worse on exams, even after accounting for GPA and time spent in the course. The author argues this reflects naïve realism acting as a barrier to learning and recommends directly confronting such beliefs in teaching.
Key findings
- Among 112 students, 33% agreed moderately or to a large extent that HDFS is “just common sense.”
- Belief that HDFS is just common sense was negatively correlated with average exam score (r = −.26, p = .007), while GPA was positively correlated (r = .37, p < .001).
- In stepwise regression, only GPA (standardized β = .40, p < .0001) and common-sense belief (standardized β = −.24, p = .007) predicted exam scores; adjusted R² = .183, F(2,104) = 12.860, p < .0001.
- Students endorsing the common-sense belief had exam scores 8 points lower (60% vs. 68%).
Methods
- Longitudinal correlational study of 112 students in two sections of an online, synchronous HDFS research methods course at a California State University campus in Fall 2020.
- Predictors came from a pre-semester self-report Learning Needs Survey, including the single item asking whether HDFS is “just common sense,” plus GPA and learning-management-system time-on-task from university records.
- Outcome was a composite average of three objective exam scores; analysis used bivariate correlations and stepwise linear regression.
Limitations
- The paper states the study was small: two sections of one course, one instructor, one university, during the first COVID-19 semester of obligatory online learning, so findings must be replicated before being accepted.
- The paper states all predictors were single items never tested for reliability or validity, the exams were not tested as research tools, and important variables such as math anxiety, specific HDFS false beliefs, and a direct measure of naïve realism were not measured.
- The paper states it cannot be known whether results generalize beyond research methods classes or beyond HDFS; the text also makes evident that the correlational design cannot establish causation.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
4 of 59 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Unnecessary child death is related to rejection of standard childhood vaccinations.
“To illustrate the risks of ignoring false beliefs based on common sense, consider the staggering cost of unnecessary child death related to rejection of standard childhood vaccinations (McGovern & Canning, 2015).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites McGovern & Canning, 2015 source
The Discussion reports that higher vaccination coverage is associated with lower under-5 mortality and estimates that expanding measles and maternal tetanus coverage could avert child deaths. The paper does not examine whether children were unvaccinated because their caregivers rejected vaccines or held false beliefs, and it cautions that the causal relationship needs further validation. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
It is possible to reduce false beliefs, including those considered to be common sense.
“It is, in fact, possible to reduce false beliefs, including those considered to be common sense (e.g., Dyer & Hall, 2019;Franz & Green, 2013;Kane et al., 2010;McLaughlin & McGill, 2017).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 3 sources checked- cites Dyer & Hall, 2019
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Franz & Green, 2013
The Analyses of Research Questions and Table 3 report lower paranormal-belief scores after the course among first-year science students, supporting the possibility of reducing some false beliefs. The paper does not identify or test beliefs considered “common sense,” so that part of the claim is not supported by this source. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites Kane et al., 2010 source
The Conclusion (page unavailable) says a skepticism course reduced paranormal beliefs on topics it covered deeply. The Method (page unavailable) identifies the beliefs measured, but the paper does not establish that beliefs considered common sense were reduced. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Findingown data
One third of students in the research methods course agreed moderately or to a large extent that HDFS is just common sense.
“Endorsement of the statement that HDFS is just common sense was not uncommon; one third of students in this research methods course agreed to it moderately or to a large extent.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The Learning Needs Survey item validly measures students' belief that HDFS is just common sense.
- Rests on an assumption: Students' self-reported answers on the Learning Needs Survey accurately reflect their beliefs and circumstances.
- Findingown data
The relationship between belief that HDFS is just common sense and exam scores held regardless of time spent engaged with course content and other circumstances widely considered hindrances to learning.
“This was true regardless of how much time they spent engaged with the course content, and regardless of other circumstances widely considered to be hindrances to learning.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The Learning Needs Survey item validly measures students' belief that HDFS is just common sense.
- Rests on an assumption: Exam scores validly measure mastery of course content or learning.
- Rests on an assumption: Students' self-reported answers on the Learning Needs Survey accurately reflect their beliefs and circumstances.
- Rests on an assumption: GPA reflects prior academic achievement.
- Rests on an assumption: The relationship between common sense belief and exam performance is not due to unmeasured confounding, so it can be interpreted as naïve realism acting as a barrier to learning.
- Findingown data
Five predictor variables were correlated with the composite exam score: GPA, belief in common sense, time-on-task, childcare responsibilities, and employment conflicts.
“Five predictor variables were correlated with the composite exam score variable (in descending order of magnitude of the correlation): GPA, belief in common sense, time-ontask, childcare responsibilities, and employment conflicts.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The Learning Needs Survey item validly measures students' belief that HDFS is just common sense.
- Rests on an assumption: Exam scores validly measure mastery of course content or learning.
- Rests on an assumption: Students' self-reported answers on the Learning Needs Survey accurately reflect their beliefs and circumstances.
- Rests on an assumption: GPA reflects prior academic achievement.
- Findingown data
When belief that HDFS is just common sense was dichotomized, it was associated with exam scores 8 points lower (60% versus 68%).
“Belief that HDFS is just common sense (when dichotomized as described in the Methods section) was associated with exam scores that were 8 points lower (60% versus 68%).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The Learning Needs Survey item validly measures students' belief that HDFS is just common sense.
- Rests on an assumption: Exam scores validly measure mastery of course content or learning.
- Rests on an assumption: Students' self-reported answers on the Learning Needs Survey accurately reflect their beliefs and circumstances.
- Findingown data
GPA significantly predicted exam scores (standardized β = .40, p < .0001).
“GPA significantly predicted exam scores (standardized β = .40,p < .0001)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Exam scores validly measure mastery of course content or learning.
- Rests on an assumption: GPA reflects prior academic achievement.
- Findingown data
Belief that HDFS is just common sense significantly predicted exam scores (standardized β = -.24, p = .007).
“as did belief that HDFS is just common sense (standardized β = À.24, p = .007).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The Learning Needs Survey item validly measures students' belief that HDFS is just common sense.
- Rests on an assumption: Exam scores validly measure mastery of course content or learning.
- Rests on an assumption: Students' self-reported answers on the Learning Needs Survey accurately reflect their beliefs and circumstances.
- Findingown data
Average exam score was negatively correlated with belief in common sense (r = -.26, p = .007).
“Average exam score .37 .000.23 .019.09.362.08 .444À.02 .876À.00 .990À.01 .907À.20 .039À.19 .049À.26 .007”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Student belief in common sense is an important predictor of learning.
“The current study was a small classroom project that produced a tantalizing finding-that student belief in common sense is an important predictor of learning.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Naïve realism produces the bias blind spot, the ability to detect biased reasoning in others but not in oneself.
“It also produces the “bias blind spot”-the ability to detect when others engage in biased reasoning, but without the ability to recognize bias in oneself (Pronin et al., 2002).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Pronin et al., 2002 source
- Premisecitation
Naïve realism produces the false-consensus effect, the mistaken assumption that one's conclusions are widely shared by others.
“Naïve realism produces the “false-consensus effect,” or the mistaken assumption that one's conclusions are widely shared by others (Ross et al., 1977).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ross et al., 1977 source
- Interpretationreasoning
Naïve realism may provide a confidence in the truth of one's common sense that interferes with motivation to learn.
“Naïve realism may provide a confidence in the truth of one's common sense that interferes with motivation to learn.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Although previous scholars had noted difficulties posed by false beliefs students bring into the classroom, very little prior research clearly demonstrates their relationship to learning.
“Although previous scholars had noted the difficulties posed by false beliefs that students bring into the classroom (e.g., Bloom & Weisberg, 2007;McDevitt & Ormrod, 2008), very little prior research clearly demonstrates its relationship to learning.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Premisecitation
College students in child development classes come in with incorrect beliefs about the subject matter that are very difficult to overcome.
“McDevitt and Ormrod (2008) identified as a problem that college students in child development classes come in with beliefs about the subject matter that are incorrect (such as the belief that intelligence is fixed or that classroom behavior problems are the result of poor parenting) but which are very difficult to overcome.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites McDevitt & Ormrod, 2008 source
- Interpretationown data
The current study suggests that it is not the specific false beliefs themselves, which were not measured, but the stated dependence on common sense more generally that interferes with learning.
“The current study suggests that it is not the specific false beliefs themselves-those were not even measured in this study-but rather the stated dependence on common sense more generally that interferes with learning.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The Learning Needs Survey item validly measures students' belief that HDFS is just common sense.
- Rests on an assumption: Exam scores validly measure mastery of course content or learning.
- Rests on an assumption: Students' self-reported answers on the Learning Needs Survey accurately reflect their beliefs and circumstances.
- Rests on an assumption: The relationship between common sense belief and exam performance is not due to unmeasured confounding, so it can be interpreted as naïve realism acting as a barrier to learning.
- Premisecitation
Familiarity with a topic breeds a sense of understanding that is often unwarranted.
“Familiarity with a topic breeds a sense of understanding that is often unwarranted (Lilienfeld, 2012), and very few topics are more familiar to people than their own development and personal relationships.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Lilienfeld, 2012
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
The familiarity of development and relationships combined with a sense of obviousness attached to common sense beliefs exacerbates the naïve realism of learners in HDFS.
“Thus, the familiarity of development and relationships combined with a sense of obviousness attached to common sense beliefs exacerbates the naïve realism of learners in HDFS.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
In one survey of students currently enrolled in a psychology research methods class, endorsement of the sentiment that psychology is a science predicted their demonstrated knowledge of research methods.
“In one survey of students currently enrolled in a psychology research methods class, endorsement of the sentiment that psychology is a science predicted their demonstrated knowledge of research methods (Gurung & Stoa, 2020).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Gurung & Stoa, 2020 source
- Interpretationreasoning
The role of naïve realism as a barrier to learning is especially likely when class content is difficult and requires substantial time and energy, such as a research methods class.
“It is also especially likely when the class content is difficult, requiring a substantial commitment of time and energy, such as a research methods class.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationcitation
Students who believed in the science, and thereby rejected the notion that psychology was just common sense, learned more than did other students.
“Students who believed in the science, and thereby rejected the notion that it was “just common sense,” learned more than did other students.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
In one survey of the general public, 83% of subjects believed that their daily life experiences are adequate to teach them what they need to know about human behavior.
“In one survey of the general public (Wood et al., 1986) 83% of subjects believed that their daily life experiences are adequate to teach them what they need to know about human behavior.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Wood et al., 1986 source
- Premisecitation
College students typically make very little improvement in critical thinking skills during years studying.
“As evidence of the failure of the standard immersion approach, college students typically make very little improvement in critical thinking skills during years studying, a finding based on a multi-institution study in the United States (Arum & Roksa, 2011) and in Europe (Van Damme et al., 2023).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Arum & Roksa, 2011
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Van Damme et al., 2023 source
- Premisecitation
The immersion approach was found completely ineffectual at reducing false beliefs in a large quasi-experimental study of critical thinking classes versus disciplinary research methods classes.
“The immersion approach has also been tested explicitly in a large quasi-experimental study of critical thinking classes versus disciplinary research methods classes on a single university campus, and found to be completely ineffectual at reducing false beliefs (Dyer & Hall, 2019).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Dyer & Hall, 2019
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationcitation
Reliance on common sense and the rejection of science that comes with it poses a serious threat to the well-being of ordinary people.
“This reliance on common sense and the rejection of science that comes with it poses a serious threat to the well-being of ordinary people.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Several studies report finding no relationship between understanding of science acquired through formal education and false beliefs.
“Furthermore, several studies report finding no relationship between understanding of science (acquired through formal education) and false beliefs (Goode, 2002;McLaughlin & McGill, 2017).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Goode, 2002
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites McLaughlin & McGill, 2017 source
- Interpretationcitation
The problem of reliance on common sense as a barrier to learning has been recognized by those who teach, as evidenced by textbooks.
“Furthermore, it has actually been recognized by those who teach, as is evidenced by the references in textbooks cited above (e.g., Lilienfeld et al., 2017;Ruane & Cerulo, 2015).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Lilienfeld et al., 2017
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Ruane & Cerulo, 2015
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationcitation
The problem of reliance on common sense as a barrier to learning is probably not specific to HDFS.
“Therefore, this problem is probably not specific to HDFS.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Lilienfeld et al., 2017
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Ruane & Cerulo, 2015
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
If reliance on common sense is not challenged, false beliefs are generally maintained, even in college-educated populations.
“If reliance on common sense is not challenged, false beliefs are generally maintained, even in college-educated populations (Newport & Strausberg, 2001).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Newport & Strausberg, 2001
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
Naïve realism produces a commitment to common sense that creates a barrier to learning.
“I propose that naïve realism, the belief that one's personal observations of the world are objective and unbiased, produces a commitment to common sense that creates a barrier to learning.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
The refutational approach was more effective than the Alka-Seltzer approach at changing false beliefs.
“In a direct comparison of strategies, Kowalski and Taylor (2009) demonstrated that the refutational approach was more effective than the Alka-Seltzer approach at changing false beliefs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kowalski & Taylor, 2009 source
- Premisecitation
Comparisons of stand-alone and infusion approaches have not yielded important discoveries.
“Comparisons of stand-alone and infusion approaches have not yielded important discoveries (e.g., Al-Ghadouni, 2021).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Al-Ghadouni, 2021
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Reviews of the literature on how to effectively teach critical thinking identify mostly poorly designed studies with weak (if any) evidence of effectiveness.
“Reviews of the literature on the question of how to effectively teach critical thinking identify mostly poorly designed studies with weak (if any) evidence of effectiveness (El Soufi & See, 2019).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites El Soufi & See, 2019 source
- Premisecitation
Educating students about naïve realism helps them keep a more open mind.
“In addition to employing a refutational approach, there is some evidence that educating students about naïve realism, specifically, helps them to keep a more open mind (Nasie et al., 2014) and helps them take others' perspectives and deal with conflict (Smith, 2020).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Nasie et al., 2014 source
- Premisecitation
An earlier meta-analysis found that intentionally creating cognitive conflict between prior knowledge and new information is more effective at reducing student misconceptions than simply providing new information.
“This affirmed the findings of an earlier meta-analysis, which found that intentionally creating cognitive conflict between prior knowledge and new information is more effective at reducing student misconceptions of course content than simply providing new information (Guzzetti et al., 1993).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Guzzetti et al., 1993 source
- May combine two claims. 27
- The quote only partly states this claim. 1
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 40
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationRejection of science based on a common sense understanding of the world contributed to rejection of the COVID-19 vaccine, which worsened the pandemic considerably.
“Recently, this rejection of science based on a common sense understanding of the world contributed to rejection of the COVID-19 vaccine, a rejection that worsened the pandemic considerably (Lin et al., 2021).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Lin et al., 2021 source
Section 4.1 (page unavailable) links denial of vaccination, described as disregarding scientific evidence, to weaker intention to receive a COVID-19 vaccine. Section 1.3 mentions philosophical objections, but the paper does not identify a common-sense understanding of the world as the cause. It warns that vaccine denial could make herd immunity difficult; it does not establish that vaccine rejection had already worsened the pandemic considerably. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
The quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataIn stepwise linear regression, the final model predicting average exam score included only GPA and belief that HDFS is just common sense (adjusted R2 = .183, F(2,104) = 12.860, p < .0001).
“Stepwise linear regression with average exam score as the outcome variable yielded a final model with only two predictor variables (adjusted R 2 = .183,F(2,104) = 12.860, p < .0001).”
- Also stated in: § DISCUSSION · plain
“Only GPA and the belief that HDFS is common sense predicted mastery of course content in a rigorous research methods course in HDFS.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The Learning Needs Survey item validly measures students' belief that HDFS is just common sense.
- Rests on an assumption: Exam scores validly measure mastery of course content or learning.
- Rests on an assumption: Students' self-reported answers on the Learning Needs Survey accurately reflect their beliefs and circumstances.
- Rests on an assumption: GPA reflects prior academic achievement.
- Also stated in: § DISCUSSION · plain
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenThe research methods class has a high fail rate, true across multiple instructors and several years, with fail rate ranging between 20% and 40% and averaging about 30%.
“The class has a high fail rate, true across multiple instructors and for several years.The fail rate for the class has ranged between 20% and 40% in recent years, with an average of about 30%.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationNaïve realism is the tendency for people to believe their own observations are obviously correct because they believe they see the world objectively and without subjective bias, and that others will arrive at the same conclusions unless they are ignorant or biased.
“Naïve realism is the tendency for people to believe their own observations are obviously correct because they believe that they see the world objectively and without subjective bias, and that others will obviously arrive at the same conclusions about the world unless they are ignorant or biased (Ross & Ward, 1996).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ross & Ward, 1996
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationNaïve realism tends to exacerbate group conflict and inflate political polarization by overestimating bias and extremity in the other group.
“Naïve realism tends to exacerbate group conflict because people overestimate the bias present in the other group and magnify the extremity of the other group's position; this leads to inflated political polarization (Robinson et al., 1995).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Robinson et al., 1995 source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationCommon sense beliefs are difficult to let go because they feel right and obvious, and this sense of certainty is a product of hindsight bias.
“Common sense beliefs are very difficult to let go of because they feel so right, so obvious.This sense of certainty, or “obviousness,” is a product of the hindsight bias (Watts, 2011;Wong, 1995).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Watts, 2011
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Wong, 1995 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningWhen students believe they have been objective and unbiased observers of their own life experience and have arrived at conclusions they believe are clearly evident, they will not see any reason to question the truth of their common sense.
“When students believe that they have been objective and unbiased observers of their own life experience and have arrived at conclusions that that they believe are clearly evident, then they will not see any reason to question the truth of their common sense.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningDependence on common sense could be a reflection of naïve realism.
“That dependence on common sense could be a reflection of naïve realism.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningThe role of naïve realism as a barrier to learning is likely especially pronounced in HDFS, where students have a sense of familiarity with the topic that promotes confidence in false beliefs.
“The role of naïve realism as a barrier to learning is likely to be especially pronounced in HDFS, where students have a sense of familiarity with the topic that promotes a confidence in false beliefs.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe discipline is moving away from calling itself family studies toward family science because of the emphasis on scientific foundations.
“The emphasis on the scientific foundations of the discipline is also the reason that the discipline is moving away from calling itself “family studies” toward “family science” (Hans, 2014).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Hans, 2014 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe vast majority of undergraduate programs in HDFS in the United States require at least one research methods class.
“The vast majority of undergraduate programs in HDFS in the United States require at least one research methods class (Hamon & Smith, 2014).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Hamon & Smith, 2014 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningGPA and grade are both measures of academic achievement and indicators of the same construct.
“Both are measures of academic achievement, and so are indicators of the same construct.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningCommon sense may serve as a barrier to learning specifically or especially in HDFS because the discipline is deeply grounded in the study of the everyday lives of ordinary people.
“It may be that common sense serves as a barrier to learning specifically, or especially, in HDFS because the discipline is so deeply grounded in the study of the everyday lives of ordinary people.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationCommon sense can be wrong, and prior knowledge including common sense sometimes gets in the way of learning.
“But common sense can be wrong, and naïve realism prevents people from even considering that possibility.”
- Also stated in: § Common sense and naïve realism · hedged
“In other words, prior knowledge, including common sense, is sometimes wrong, and it gets in the way of learning.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Chabris & Simons, 2010
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Lilienfeld, 2012
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Also stated in: § Common sense and naïve realism · hedged
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationA solid grounding in empirical evidence is considered a foundational principle of family life education.
“In fact, a solid grounding in empirical evidence is considered a foundational principle of family life education, the applied profession affiliated with HDFS (Darling et al., 2017).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Darling et al., 2017 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe relationship between GPA and grade is unsurprising because prior grades are typically the best predictor of future grades.
“The relationship between GPA and grade is unsurprising, as prior grades are typically the best predictor of future grades (e.g., Crowther & Briant, 2021;Gortner Lahmers & Zulauf, 2000).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Crowther & Briant, 2021
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Gortner Lahmers & Zulauf, 2000
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationResistance to science when it conflicts with beliefs derived from personal experiences is developmentally normal but creates a barrier to learning.
“A resistance to science when it conflicts with beliefs derived from personal experiences is developmentally normal, but creates a barrier to learning (Bloom & Weisberg, 2007).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Bloom & Weisberg, 2007 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Study design and conductnone givenThe sample of 112 students is representative of the HDFS program at this university.
“This sample is representative of the HDFS program at this university.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenExams were objective indicators of learning and excluded other sources of points that reflect participation rather than mastery of course content.
“Exams were objective indicators of learning, and they excluded other sources of points in the class that reflect participation (e.g., iClicker quiz scores, written assignments) rather than mastery of course content.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductcitationLearning management system time-on-task is a reasonable proxy for student engagement, especially in online classes, although such analytics are imperfect.
“Although data analytics provided by the learning management system are certainly imperfect (e.g., Kelley, 2021), they have been demonstrated to predict learning outcomes (Santos et al., 2021;Saqr et al., 2017) and are considered a reasonable proxy for student engagement, especially in online classes (Motz et al., 2019).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Kelley, 2021
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Santos et al., 2021
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Motz et al., 2019 source
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThe fact that reliance on common sense emerged second only to GPA, even after time spent studying fell out of the model, supports the argument that naïve realism produces a reliance on common sense that acts as a barrier to learning.
“However, the fact that reliance on common sense emerged second only to demonstrated academic achievement (GPA), and that it did so even after factors such as time spent studying fell out of the model supports the argument that naïve realism produces a reliance on common sense that acts as a barrier to learning.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The relationship between common sense belief and exam performance is not due to unmeasured confounding, so it can be interpreted as naïve realism acting as a barrier to learning.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningThe outcome measure reflects exams-measures of objective knowledge-that have been developed carefully over many years but never tested as a research tool, and therefore are of unknown reliability and validity.
“The outcome measure reflects exams-measures of objective knowledge-that have been developed carefully over many years but never tested as a research tool, and therefore are of unknown reliability and validity.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Exams are measures of objective knowledge.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningIt cannot be known if these results might be anticipated in other HDFS courses.
“It cannot be known if these results might be anticipated in other HDFS courses.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisecitationEarley (2014) reviewed literature and offered generalizations that students in social science research methods classes fail to see relevance, are anxious, uninterested, unmotivated, have poor attitudes, and have significant misconceptions about research.
“Earley (2014) reviewed published literature and offered several discouraging generalizations about students in research methods classes in the social sciences: they fail to see the relevance of the course to their major, they are anxious about the difficulty of the course, they are uninterested in the material and unmotivated to learn it, they have poor attitudes toward research, and they have sig”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Earley, 2014 source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationResearch methods classes are not always well received by college students, and HDFS students are no exception.
“However, research methods classes are not always wellreceived by college students (Crowe et al., 2014;Garner et al., 2009;Winn, 1995), and HDFS students are no exception.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Crowe et al., 2014
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Garner et al., 2009
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Winn, 1995 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationA significant body of work on the pedagogy of research methods instruction has emerged since Earley's 2014 review.
“A significant body of work on the pedagogy of research methods instruction has emerged since Earley's 2014 review (Nind & Katramadou, 2023).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Nind & Katramadou, 2023
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenBoth the instructor and most students were new to online learning and were in the middle of a traumatic worldwide health crisis.
“Both the instructor and most of the students were new to online learning and were in the middle of a traumatic worldwide health crisis.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationThe positive impact of a teaching assistant suggests that research methods can be difficult and that more people to help students face the challenge works to improve outcomes.
“The positive impact of a teaching assistant suggests that research methods can be difficult and that more people to help students face the challenge works to improve outcomes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningEvery predictor variable measured was measured with a single item never tested for reliability or validity.
“The same can be said of every predictor variable measured.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn a criminology research methods class, several factors were negatively predictive of academic performance, but math anxiety was the only explanation that remained significant in multivariate analysis.
“In fact, research on students in a criminology research methods class (Meldrum & Stults, 2012) found that several of these factors were negatively predictive of academic performance, but math anxiety was the only explanation that remained significant in a multivariate analysis.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Meldrum & Stults, 2012
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationOther scholars have identified math anxiety as another factor in student distaste for research methods classes.
“Other scholars have identified math anxiety as another factor in student distaste for research methods classes (e.g., Briggs et al., 2009).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Briggs et al., 2009 source
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductnone givenThe current study involved only two sections of one course, taught by the same instructor, at only one university.
“The current study is a small project, involving only two sections of one course, taught by the same instructor, at only one university.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductnone givenThe study was conducted in the context of a research methods class.
“Finally, this study was conducted in the context of a research methods class.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningA relationship identified in such an unusual context cannot be automatically considered generally true.
“Therefore, a relationship that is identified in such an unusual context cannot be automatically considered to be generally true.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationEarley noted that individual student scores on these variables have not been directly linked to actual performance in research methods classes.
“Earley noted that these are general descriptions of students in research methods classes, but that individual student scores on these variables have not been directly linked to actual performance in those classes, although the researchers who report these findings speculate that these negative attitudes certainly hinder learning.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Earley, 2014 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenBelief in common sense was measured with only a single item, which has never been tested for reliability or validity.
“Belief in common sense was measured with only a single item, which has never been tested for reliability or validity.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationResearch methods classes are notoriously difficult and produce a lot of resistance among students in the social sciences.
“Research methods classes are notoriously difficult and produce a lot of resistance among students in the social sciences (Earley, 2014).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Earley, 2014 source
May combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningAll variables were measured as part of practice in the field rather than as a laboratory research project, and therefore have predictable limitations.
“Because all of the variables were measured as part of practice in the field, rather than being constructed as a laboratory research project, they have some predictable limitations.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisecitationLilienfeld argued that in psychology the immersion approach is standard practice and has demonstratively failed.
“Lilienfeld argued that, in his discipline of psychology, this is standard practice and has demonstratively failed.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Lilienfeld (Psychological Science, 2014)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Premisenone givenOne explanation that remains unexplored is that students believe the social sciences, including HDFS, are mostly common sense anyway, so that research seems unnecessary.
“One explanation that remains unexplored is that students believe the social sciences, including HDFS, are mostly common sense anyway, so that research seems unnecessary.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Premisenone givenDespite a large body of literature on challenges of teaching and learning research methods in higher education, very little is known about why these challenges exist in the first place.
“Despite this large body of literature on the challenges of teaching and learning research methods in higher education, very little is known about why these challenges exist in the first place.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationVery little, if any, research explores the efficacy of active or experiential learning strategies, although one study reported that undergraduate teaching assistants reduced the fail rate and produced higher grades overall in a research methods course.
“Very little, if any, research explores the efficacy of these strategies, although one study reported that the use of undergraduate teaching assistants reduced the fail rate and produced higher grades overall in a research methods course (Crowe et al., 2014).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Crowe et al., 2014
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductnone givenThe current study took place during the first semester of obligatory online learning prompted by the COVID-19 pandemic.
“It took place during the first semester of obligatory online learning prompted by the COVID-19 pandemic.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenSome important variables were not measured at all.
“Furthermore, some important variables were not measured at all.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningIf trained HDFS professionals resist learning things that challenge common sense, then the discipline stands little chance of improving everyday life for ordinary people.
“If even those who are trained professionals in HDFS resist learning things that challenge common sense, then our discipline stands little chance of improving everyday life for ordinary people.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationFaculty in psychology and related social sciences are clear that research methods training is essential for basic science literacy and to promote critical thinking.
“Faculty members in psychology and related social sciences are very clear that research methods training is essential for basic science literacy (Cranney & Dunn, 2011) and to promote critical thinking (Gurung & Stoa, 2020).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationMost psychology faculty (79%) identify the development of scientific thinking as the most important reason for requiring a research methods class in the curriculum.
“Most psychology faculty (79%) identify the development of scientific thinking as the most important reason for requiring a research methods class in the curriculum (Ciarocco et al., 2017).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ciarocco et al., 2017 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenIt is likely that this is a problem in many academic disciplines.
“It is likely that this is a problem in many academic disciplines.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisecitationTo be effective, instruction must directly confront false beliefs and provide explicit instruction about how to recognize the cognitive errors that produced them.
“To be effective, the instruction must directly confront the false beliefs, providing explicit instruction about how to recognize the cognitive errors that produced them in the first place.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationEducating students about naïve realism helps them take others' perspectives and deal with conflict.
“In addition to employing a refutational approach, there is some evidence that educating students about naïve realism, specifically, helps them to keep a more open mind (Nasie et al., 2014) and helps them take others' perspectives and deal with conflict (Smith, 2020).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Smith, 2020 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningBecause college students have extensive personal experiences with human development and family relationships, the problem may be especially problematic for HDFS.
“But given that college students have extensive personal experiences with human development and with family relationships, this may be especially problematic for the discipline of HDFS.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: College students have extensive personal experiences with human development and with family relationships.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenThere is no reason to believe that tactics of educating about naïve realism would not work similarly with college students.
“These studies were conducted on high school students, but there is no reason to believe that these tactics would not work similarly with college students.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisereasoningSome studies report evidence of effectiveness of critical thinking instruction, and others do not.
“Some studies report evidence of effectiveness, and others do not.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationAbrami et al. suggested that the important factor in critical thinking education is not where the course is located in the curriculum, but rather the pedagogies employed by the instructor.
“Abrami et al. (2015) suggested that the important factor is not where the course is located in the curriculum, but rather the pedagogies employed by the instructor.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Abrami et al., 2015 source
The paper relies on this without support.
The Learning Needs Survey item validly measures students' belief that HDFS is just common sense.
“The primary predictor variable, the belief that HDFS is common sense, was measured via the Learning Needs Survey required of all students on or before the first day of class.”
“The addition of the question about common sense was a slight adjustment made by the instructor in this case.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Exam scores validly measure mastery of course content or learning.
“Exams were objective indicators of learning, and they excluded other sources of points in the class that reflect participation (e.g., iClicker quiz scores, written assignments) rather than mastery of course content.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Students' self-reported answers on the Learning Needs Survey accurately reflect their beliefs and circumstances.
“Students were asked to what extent they believe that HDFS is “just common sense.””
The paper relies on this without support.
GPA reflects prior academic achievement.
“Student's GPA at the beginning of the semester was available for all enrolled students in the university's data management system and reflected the student's prior academic achievement in other courses.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The relationship between common sense belief and exam performance is not due to unmeasured confounding, so it can be interpreted as naïve realism acting as a barrier to learning.
“supports the argument that naïve realism produces a reliance on common sense that acts as a barrier to learning.”
The paper relies on this without support.
No prior investigations have been published exploring the relationship between belief in common sense and demonstrated learning.
“To my knowledge, no prior investigations have been published exploring the relationship between belief in common sense and demonstrated learning.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Exams are measures of objective knowledge.
“The outcome measure reflects exams-measures of objective knowledge-that have been developed carefully over many years but never tested as a research tool, and therefore are of unknown reliability and validity.”
The paper relies on this without support.
College students have extensive personal experiences with human development and with family relationships.
“But given that college students have extensive personal experiences with human development and with family relationships, this may be especially problematic for the discipline of HDFS.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Overcoming maintenance of false beliefs in advanced education is a recognized problem in higher education.
“How, then, to overcome maintenance of false beliefs even in the midst of advanced education is a recognized problem in higher education.”
Statistics recomputed
Every reported test result, recomputed from its test statistic and degrees of freedom. A result shows as not adding up only once an independent check has confirmed it.
- ConsistentF(2, 104) = 12.86reported p < .0001 · recomputed p < .001
“F(2,104) = 12.860, p < .0001”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Percentage of students retaking the class is incorrect
MinorThe paper reports 112 registered students. Of those, 24 is 21.4%, not 19%.
Reported 19 · recomputed 21.428571
“A significant number (n = 24, 19%) were retaking the class after a prior failure.”
Cites
The “false consensus effect”: An egocentric bias in social perception and attribution processes
Ross, L., Greene, D., & House, P. (1977) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/0022-1031(77)90049-x · Cited by 3,139 · see citing works
The bias blind spot: perceptions of bias in self versus others
Pronin, E., Lin, D. Y., & Ross, L. (2002) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167202286008 · Cited by 1,289 · see citing works
Strategies for Teaching Students to Think Critically: A Meta-Analysis
Abrami, P. C., Bernard, R. M., Borokhovski, E., Waddington, D. I., Wade, C. A., & Persson, T. (2015) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/0034654314551063 · Cited by 932 · see citing works
Gut feelings: the intelligence of the unconscious
(2008) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.45-4078 · Cited by 723 · see citing works
(2011) · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226028576.001.0001 · Cited by 562 · see citing works
Guzzetti, B. J., Snyder, T. E., Glass, G. V., & Gamas, W. S. (1993) · Reading Research Quarterly · doi:10.2307/747886 · Cited by 518 · see citing works
How to think straight about psychology
Stanovich, K. E. (1985) · Cited by 486 · see citing works
Robinson, R. J., Keltner, D., Ward, A., & Ross, L. (1995) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.68.3.404 · Cited by 478 · see citing works
The invisible gorilla: and other ways our intuitions deceive us
(2010) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.48-1757 · Cited by 320 · see citing works
A synthesis of the literature on research methods education
Earley, M. A. (2014) · Teaching in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/13562517.2013.860105 · Cited by 284 · see citing works
Lilienfeld, S. O. (2011) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/a0023963 · Cited by 251 · see citing works
How Do Infants Learn About the Physical World?
Baillargeon, R. (1994) · Current Directions in Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/1467-8721.ep10770614 · Cited by 247 · see citing works
Commonsense Chemistry: A Model for Understanding Students' Alternative Conceptions
Talanquer, V. (2006) · Journal of Chemical Education · doi:10.1021/ed083p811 · Cited by 225 · see citing works
50 Great Myths of Popular Psychology: Shattering Widespread Misconceptions about Human Behavior
Lilienfeld, S. O. (2009) · Cited by 213 · see citing works
Childhood Origins of Adult Resistance to Science
Bloom, P., & Weisberg, D. S. (2007) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1133398 · Cited by 210 · see citing works
The Effect of Refuting Misconceptions in the Introductory Psychology Class
Kowalski, P., & Taylor, A. K. (2009) · Teaching of Psychology · doi:10.1080/00986280902959986 · Cited by 192 · see citing works
Young Children's Conception of the Biological World
Inagaki, K., & Hatano, G. (2006) · Current Directions in Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8721.2006.00431.x · Cited by 184 · see citing works
El Soufi, N., & See, B. H. (2019) · Studies in Educational Evaluation · doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2018.12.006 · Cited by 183 · see citing works
Saqr, M., Fors, U., & Tedre, M. (2017) · Medical Teacher · doi:10.1080/0142159x.2017.1309376 · Cited by 182 · see citing works
Vaccine hesitancy: a generation at risk
Health, T. L. C. A. (2019) · The Lancet Child & Adolescent Health · doi:10.1016/s2352-4642(19)30092-6 · Cited by 160 · see citing works
Winn, S. (1995) · Studies in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/03075079512331381703 · Cited by 137 · see citing works
(2000) · Journal of college student development · Cited by 128 · see citing works
McGovern, M. E., & Canning, D. (2015) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/aje/kwv125 · Cited by 122 · see citing works
Vanishing Vaccinations: Why Are So Many Americans Opting Out of Vaccinating Their Children?
Calandrillo, S. (2025) · University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform · doi:10.36646/mjlr.37.2.vanishing · Cited by 115 · see citing works
Thorndahl, K. L., & Stentoft, D. (2020) · Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning · doi:10.14434/ijpbl.v14i1.28773 · Cited by 110 · see citing works
Psychology: From Inquiry to Understanding
So, L., Lynn, S. J., Namy, L. L., Woolf, N. J., Jamieson, G., Marks, A., & Slaughter (2008) · EPubDev Repository · Cited by 105 · see citing works
Effect of Critical Thinking Education on Epistemically Unwarranted Beliefs in College Students
Dyer, K. D., & Hall, R. E. (2018) · Research in Higher Education · doi:10.1007/s11162-018-9513-3 · Cited by 96 · see citing works
Self-citationMauriz, B. P., Anaya, P. B., Bargiela, I. M., & Pérez, B. C. (2019) · Studies in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/03075079.2019.1586333 · Cited by 85 · see citing works
Surveying psychology's public image.
Wood, W., Jones, M., & Benjamin, L. T. (1986) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037//0003-066x.41.9.947 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
The Teaching Brain and the End of the Empty Vessel
Rodríguez, V. (2012) · Mind Brain and Education · doi:10.1111/j.1751-228x.2012.01155.x · Cited by 66 · see citing works
The Psychologically Literate Citizen
Cranney, J., & Dunn, D. (2011) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199794942.001.0001 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
Explicitly Teaching Critical Thinking Skills in a History Course
McLaughlin, A. C., & McGill, A. E. (2017) · Science & Education · doi:10.1007/s11191-017-9878-2 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
The Discipline of Family Science and the Continuing Need for Innovation
Hamon, R. R., & Smith, S. R. (2014) · Family Relations · doi:10.1111/fare.12068 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Who needs physics education research!?
Hestenes, D. (1998) · American Journal of Physics · doi:10.1119/1.18898 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Nasie, M., Bar-Tal, D., Pliskin, R., Nahhas, E., & Halperin, E. (2014) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167214551153 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
The validity and utility of activity logs as a measure of student engagement
Motz, B., Quick, J., Schroeder, N., Zook, J., & Gunkel, M. (2019) · Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Learning Analytics & Knowledge · doi:10.1145/3303772.3303789 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Surveying psychology's public image.
Wood, W., Jones, M., & Benjamin, L. T. (1986) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.41.9.947 · Cited by 36
Assessing and Developing Critical-thinking Skills in Higher Education
Van Damme, D., Zahner, D., Cortellini, O., Dawber, T., & Rotholz, K. (2023) · European Journal of Education · doi:10.1111/ejed.12563 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Briggs, L. T., Brown, S. E., Gardner, R. B., & Davidson, R. L. (2009) · Journal of Criminal Justice Education · doi:10.1080/10511250903109348 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Enhancing student learning of research methods through the use of undergraduate teaching assistants
Crowe, J. A., Ceresola, R. G., & Silva, T. J. (2013) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2013.871222 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Nind, M., & Katramadou, A. (2022) · British Journal of Educational Studies · doi:10.1080/00071005.2022.2092066 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Whither Famology? Department Name Trends Across Four Decades
Hans, J. D. (2014) · Family Relations · doi:10.1111/fare.12075 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Family Life Education: Translational Family Science in Action
Darling, C. A., Cassidy, D., & Rehm, M. (2017) · Family Relations · doi:10.1111/fare.12286 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
McDevitt, T. M., & Ormrod, J. E. (2008) · Child Development Perspectives · doi:10.1111/j.1750-8606.2008.00045.x · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Kane, M. J., Core, T. J., & Hunt, R. R. (2010) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/pbr.17.2.206 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Predicting Academic Success: A Longitudinal Study of University Design Students
Crowther, P., & Briant, S. (2020) · International Journal of Art & Design Education · doi:10.1111/jade.12329 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Research on teaching: Process-product research findings and the feelings of obviousness.
Wong, L. Y.-S. (1995) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.87.3.504 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Preparing the Educators Who Teach About Families: Engaging Family Science in the University Setting
Allen, K. R., & Lavender‐Stott, E. S. (2020) · Family Relations · doi:10.1111/fare.12421 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Stand-Alone Versus Integrated Critical Thinking Courses
Hatcher, D. L. (2006) · The Journal of General Education · doi:10.2307/27798054 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
(2013) · Fisher Digital Publications (St. John Fisher College) · Cited by 15 · see citing works
The methodology of testing naive beliefs in the physics classroom
Donley, R. D., & Ashcraft, M. H. (1992) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/bf03210922 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Where Are They Now? The Results of an HDFS Alumni Survey
Walker, K., & Blankemeyer, M. (2013) · Family Science Review · doi:10.26536/fsr.2013.18.02.03 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
What’s the point? Faculty perceptions of research methods courses.
Ciarocco, N. J., Strohmetz, D. B., & Lewandowski, G. W. (2017) · Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Psychology · doi:10.1037/stl0000085 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Looking Backward, Around, and Forward: Family Science Has Always Been Translational Science
Grzywacz, J. G., & Middlemiss, W. (2017) · Family Relations · doi:10.1111/fare.12280 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Gurung, R. A. R., & Stoa, R. (2020) · Teaching of Psychology · doi:10.1177/0098628320901374 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Meldrum, R. C., & Stults, B. J. (2011) · Journal of Criminal Justice Education · doi:10.1080/10511253.2011.590513 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Gabler, J. (2010) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781118269237 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
The Assimilation of Sociology into Common Sense: Some Implications for Teaching
Bengston, W. F., & Hazzard, J. W. (1990) · Teaching Sociology · doi:10.2307/1318229 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Lin, Y.-J., Chou, W.-J., Chang, Y.-P., & Yen, C.-F. (2021) · Vaccines · doi:10.3390/vaccines9080822 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Second Thoughts: Sociology Challenges Conventional Wisdom
Ruane, J. M., & Cerulo, K. A. (2020) · Sage eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781506345772 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Research Foundations of Human Development and Family Science
Dyer, K. D. (2022) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781003179078 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Self-citationTeaching Methods in Social Sciences
Tribelhorn, T. (n.d.) · BORIS (University Library Bern) · doi:10.7892/boris.92849 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Smith, S. (2020) · Educational and Child Psychology · doi:10.53841/bpsecp.2020.37.3.56 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- Al‐Ghadouni A. M., 2021, Instructional approaches to critical thinking: An overview of reviews, Revista Argentina de Clinica Psicologica, 30, 240
- Goode E., 2002, Education, scientific knowledge, and belief in the paranormal, Skeptical Inquirer, 26, 24
- Ross L., 1996, Values and knowledge, 103
- Santos M. R., 2021, Does time spent online with course material result in student success? A study for the online and face‐to‐face courses, Journal of Instructional Pedagogies, 25, 1
- Watts D. J., 2011, Everything is obvious: How common sense fails us
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Growing Pains: The History of Human Development and the Future of the Field
McCormick, K. C., & Mendle, J. (2025) · Child Development Perspectives · doi:10.1111/cdep.12541 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Dyer, K. D., Foster, C., Hall, R., & Pasternak-Taschner, N. (2025) · College Teaching · doi:10.1080/87567555.2025.2559945 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Dyer, K. D.
- Affiliations
- California State University, Fresno (US)
- Corresponding author
- Dyer, Kathleen D.
- ORCID
- Dyer, Kathleen D.
- Venue
- Family Relations
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2023-11-16
- Volume
- 73
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 2064-2078
- ISSN
- 0197-6664 (ISSN-L)
- 1741-3729
- OpenAlex
- W4388731375
- Semantic Scholar
- 5b16cd308b9319eab02996ebea9526012a063eae
- Cited by
- 2
- References
- 61
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2
- FWCI
- 0.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Family Relations (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational Strategies and Epistemologies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
- Social Sciences › Education › Evaluation of Teaching Practices
- Keywords
- naive realism, common sense, barriers to learning, research methodology training, academic performance, prior academic achievement, cognitive biases, student beliefs, higher education
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-23.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-23.
Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review