Cited by 2Educational Strategies and EpistemologiesEducation, Achievement, and GiftednessEvaluation of Teaching Practices

Lessons from the field: Isn't it just common sense? Naïve realism as a barrier to learning

Open access
Dyer, Kathleen D.·2024·Family Relations

Abstract

Objective: The goal was to determine whether or not there is an association between the belief that human development and family science (HDFS) is “just common sense” and academic performance in a rigorous research methods class in HDFS. Background: Naïve realism is a cognitive bias that creates a belief in common sense that is difficult to challenge. It is unknown whether student commitment to common sense impedes students' ability to learn. Method: Students (N = 112) in an HDFS research methods class were followed for a semester. Potential barriers to learning were measured through a self‐report survey before the start of the semester. The outcome variable was objective performance in the course as measured by exam scores. Results: Exam scores were positively correlated with prior academic achievement and negatively correlated with student belief that the discipline is just common sense. Conclusion: Naïve realism, expressed as the belief that HDFS is just common sense, predicts poor performance in a research methods class. Implications: Higher education faculty in HDFS must directly confront the problem that our discipline is perceived as just common sense. Naïve realism must be challenged directly in coursework if students are to learn about the science of HDFS.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

In an undergraduate human development and family science (HDFS) research methods course, students who believed HDFS is “just common sense” performed worse on exams, even after accounting for GPA and time spent in the course. The author argues this reflects naïve realism acting as a barrier to learning and recommends directly confronting such beliefs in teaching.

Key findings

  • Among 112 students, 33% agreed moderately or to a large extent that HDFS is “just common sense.”
  • Belief that HDFS is just common sense was negatively correlated with average exam score (r = −.26, p = .007), while GPA was positively correlated (r = .37, p < .001).
  • In stepwise regression, only GPA (standardized β = .40, p < .0001) and common-sense belief (standardized β = −.24, p = .007) predicted exam scores; adjusted R² = .183, F(2,104) = 12.860, p < .0001.
  • Students endorsing the common-sense belief had exam scores 8 points lower (60% vs. 68%).

Methods

  • Longitudinal correlational study of 112 students in two sections of an online, synchronous HDFS research methods course at a California State University campus in Fall 2020.
  • Predictors came from a pre-semester self-report Learning Needs Survey, including the single item asking whether HDFS is “just common sense,” plus GPA and learning-management-system time-on-task from university records.
  • Outcome was a composite average of three objective exam scores; analysis used bivariate correlations and stepwise linear regression.

Limitations

  • The paper states the study was small: two sections of one course, one instructor, one university, during the first COVID-19 semester of obligatory online learning, so findings must be replicated before being accepted.
  • The paper states all predictors were single items never tested for reliability or validity, the exams were not tested as research tools, and important variables such as math anxiety, specific HDFS false beliefs, and a direct measure of naïve realism were not measured.
  • The paper states it cannot be known whether results generalize beyond research methods classes or beyond HDFS; the text also makes evident that the correlational design cannot establish causation.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/fare.12967

Cites

63 of 63 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

4 of 59 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

  • Premisecitation

    Unnecessary child death is related to rejection of standard childhood vaccinations.

    “To illustrate the risks of ignoring false beliefs based on common sense, consider the staggering cost of unnecessary child death related to rejection of standard childhood vaccinations (McGovern & Canning, 2015).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites McGovern & Canning, 2015 source

      The Discussion reports that higher vaccination coverage is associated with lower under-5 mortality and estimates that expanding measles and maternal tetanus coverage could avert child deaths. The paper does not examine whether children were unvaccinated because their caregivers rejected vaccines or held false beliefs, and it cautions that the causal relationship needs further validation. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Premisecitation

    It is possible to reduce false beliefs, including those considered to be common sense.

    “It is, in fact, possible to reduce false beliefs, including those considered to be common sense (e.g., Dyer & Hall, 2019;Franz & Green, 2013;Kane et al., 2010;McLaughlin & McGill, 2017).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Dyer & Hall, 2019

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Franz & Green, 2013

      The Analyses of Research Questions and Table 3 report lower paranormal-belief scores after the course among first-year science students, supporting the possibility of reducing some false beliefs. The paper does not identify or test beliefs considered “common sense,” so that part of the claim is not supported by this source. (LLM, conf=0.85)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Kane et al., 2010 source

      The Conclusion (page unavailable) says a skepticism course reduced paranormal beliefs on topics it covered deeply. The Method (page unavailable) identifies the beliefs measured, but the paper does not establish that beliefs considered common sense were reduced. (LLM, conf=0.85)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Findingown data

    One third of students in the research methods course agreed moderately or to a large extent that HDFS is just common sense.

    “Endorsement of the statement that HDFS is just common sense was not uncommon; one third of students in this research methods course agreed to it moderately or to a large extent.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The Learning Needs Survey item validly measures students' belief that HDFS is just common sense.
    • Rests on an assumption: Students' self-reported answers on the Learning Needs Survey accurately reflect their beliefs and circumstances.
  • Findingown data

    The relationship between belief that HDFS is just common sense and exam scores held regardless of time spent engaged with course content and other circumstances widely considered hindrances to learning.

    “This was true regardless of how much time they spent engaged with the course content, and regardless of other circumstances widely considered to be hindrances to learning.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The Learning Needs Survey item validly measures students' belief that HDFS is just common sense.
    • Rests on an assumption: Exam scores validly measure mastery of course content or learning.
    • Rests on an assumption: Students' self-reported answers on the Learning Needs Survey accurately reflect their beliefs and circumstances.
    • Rests on an assumption: GPA reflects prior academic achievement.
    • Rests on an assumption: The relationship between common sense belief and exam performance is not due to unmeasured confounding, so it can be interpreted as naïve realism acting as a barrier to learning.
  • Findingown data

    Five predictor variables were correlated with the composite exam score: GPA, belief in common sense, time-on-task, childcare responsibilities, and employment conflicts.

    “Five predictor variables were correlated with the composite exam score variable (in descending order of magnitude of the correlation): GPA, belief in common sense, time-ontask, childcare responsibilities, and employment conflicts.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The Learning Needs Survey item validly measures students' belief that HDFS is just common sense.
    • Rests on an assumption: Exam scores validly measure mastery of course content or learning.
    • Rests on an assumption: Students' self-reported answers on the Learning Needs Survey accurately reflect their beliefs and circumstances.
    • Rests on an assumption: GPA reflects prior academic achievement.
  • May combine two claims. 27
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 1
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 40
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Rejection of science based on a common sense understanding of the world contributed to rejection of the COVID-19 vaccine, which worsened the pandemic considerably.

    “Recently, this rejection of science based on a common sense understanding of the world contributed to rejection of the COVID-19 vaccine, a rejection that worsened the pandemic considerably (Lin et al., 2021).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Lin et al., 2021 source

      Section 4.1 (page unavailable) links denial of vaccination, described as disregarding scientific evidence, to weaker intention to receive a COVID-19 vaccine. Section 1.3 mentions philosophical objections, but the paper does not identify a common-sense understanding of the world as the cause. It warns that vaccine denial could make herd immunity difficult; it does not establish that vaccine rejection had already worsened the pandemic considerably. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingown data

    In stepwise linear regression, the final model predicting average exam score included only GPA and belief that HDFS is just common sense (adjusted R2 = .183, F(2,104) = 12.860, p < .0001).

    “Stepwise linear regression with average exam score as the outcome variable yielded a final model with only two predictor variables (adjusted R 2 = .183,F(2,104) = 12.860, p < .0001).”
    • Also stated in: § DISCUSSION · plain
      “Only GPA and the belief that HDFS is common sense predicted mastery of course content in a rigorous research methods course in HDFS.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The Learning Needs Survey item validly measures students' belief that HDFS is just common sense.
    • Rests on an assumption: Exam scores validly measure mastery of course content or learning.
    • Rests on an assumption: Students' self-reported answers on the Learning Needs Survey accurately reflect their beliefs and circumstances.
    • Rests on an assumption: GPA reflects prior academic achievement.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    The research methods class has a high fail rate, true across multiple instructors and several years, with fail rate ranging between 20% and 40% and averaging about 30%.

    “The class has a high fail rate, true across multiple instructors and for several years.The fail rate for the class has ranged between 20% and 40% in recent years, with an average of about 30%.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Naïve realism is the tendency for people to believe their own observations are obviously correct because they believe they see the world objectively and without subjective bias, and that others will arrive at the same conclusions unless they are ignorant or biased.

    “Naïve realism is the tendency for people to believe their own observations are obviously correct because they believe that they see the world objectively and without subjective bias, and that others will obviously arrive at the same conclusions about the world unless they are ignorant or biased (Ross & Ward, 1996).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Ross & Ward, 1996

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Naïve realism tends to exacerbate group conflict and inflate political polarization by overestimating bias and extremity in the other group.

    “Naïve realism tends to exacerbate group conflict because people overestimate the bias present in the other group and magnify the extremity of the other group's position; this leads to inflated political polarization (Robinson et al., 1995).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Robinson et al., 1995 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Common sense beliefs are difficult to let go because they feel right and obvious, and this sense of certainty is a product of hindsight bias.

    “Common sense beliefs are very difficult to let go of because they feel so right, so obvious.This sense of certainty, or “obviousness,” is a product of the hindsight bias (Watts, 2011;Wong, 1995).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Watts, 2011

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Wong, 1995 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    When students believe they have been objective and unbiased observers of their own life experience and have arrived at conclusions they believe are clearly evident, they will not see any reason to question the truth of their common sense.

    “When students believe that they have been objective and unbiased observers of their own life experience and have arrived at conclusions that that they believe are clearly evident, then they will not see any reason to question the truth of their common sense.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Dependence on common sense could be a reflection of naïve realism.

    “That dependence on common sense could be a reflection of naïve realism.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    The role of naïve realism as a barrier to learning is likely especially pronounced in HDFS, where students have a sense of familiarity with the topic that promotes confidence in false beliefs.

    “The role of naïve realism as a barrier to learning is likely to be especially pronounced in HDFS, where students have a sense of familiarity with the topic that promotes a confidence in false beliefs.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The discipline is moving away from calling itself family studies toward family science because of the emphasis on scientific foundations.

    “The emphasis on the scientific foundations of the discipline is also the reason that the discipline is moving away from calling itself “family studies” toward “family science” (Hans, 2014).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Hans, 2014 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The vast majority of undergraduate programs in HDFS in the United States require at least one research methods class.

    “The vast majority of undergraduate programs in HDFS in the United States require at least one research methods class (Hamon & Smith, 2014).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Hamon & Smith, 2014 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    GPA and grade are both measures of academic achievement and indicators of the same construct.

    “Both are measures of academic achievement, and so are indicators of the same construct.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Common sense may serve as a barrier to learning specifically or especially in HDFS because the discipline is deeply grounded in the study of the everyday lives of ordinary people.

    “It may be that common sense serves as a barrier to learning specifically, or especially, in HDFS because the discipline is so deeply grounded in the study of the everyday lives of ordinary people.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Common sense can be wrong, and prior knowledge including common sense sometimes gets in the way of learning.

    “But common sense can be wrong, and naïve realism prevents people from even considering that possibility.”
    • Also stated in: § Common sense and naïve realism · hedged
      “In other words, prior knowledge, including common sense, is sometimes wrong, and it gets in the way of learning.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Chabris & Simons, 2010

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Lilienfeld, 2012

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    A solid grounding in empirical evidence is considered a foundational principle of family life education.

    “In fact, a solid grounding in empirical evidence is considered a foundational principle of family life education, the applied profession affiliated with HDFS (Darling et al., 2017).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Darling et al., 2017 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The relationship between GPA and grade is unsurprising because prior grades are typically the best predictor of future grades.

    “The relationship between GPA and grade is unsurprising, as prior grades are typically the best predictor of future grades (e.g., Crowther & Briant, 2021;Gortner Lahmers & Zulauf, 2000).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Crowther & Briant, 2021

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Gortner Lahmers & Zulauf, 2000
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Resistance to science when it conflicts with beliefs derived from personal experiences is developmentally normal but creates a barrier to learning.

    “A resistance to science when it conflicts with beliefs derived from personal experiences is developmentally normal, but creates a barrier to learning (Bloom & Weisberg, 2007).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Bloom & Weisberg, 2007 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Study design and conductnone given

    The sample of 112 students is representative of the HDFS program at this university.

    “This sample is representative of the HDFS program at this university.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    Exams were objective indicators of learning and excluded other sources of points that reflect participation rather than mastery of course content.

    “Exams were objective indicators of learning, and they excluded other sources of points in the class that reflect participation (e.g., iClicker quiz scores, written assignments) rather than mastery of course content.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductcitation

    Learning management system time-on-task is a reasonable proxy for student engagement, especially in online classes, although such analytics are imperfect.

    “Although data analytics provided by the learning management system are certainly imperfect (e.g., Kelley, 2021), they have been demonstrated to predict learning outcomes (Santos et al., 2021;Saqr et al., 2017) and are considered a reasonable proxy for student engagement, especially in online classes (Motz et al., 2019).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Kelley, 2021

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Santos et al., 2021

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Motz et al., 2019 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    The fact that reliance on common sense emerged second only to GPA, even after time spent studying fell out of the model, supports the argument that naïve realism produces a reliance on common sense that acts as a barrier to learning.

    “However, the fact that reliance on common sense emerged second only to demonstrated academic achievement (GPA), and that it did so even after factors such as time spent studying fell out of the model supports the argument that naïve realism produces a reliance on common sense that acts as a barrier to learning.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The relationship between common sense belief and exam performance is not due to unmeasured confounding, so it can be interpreted as naïve realism acting as a barrier to learning.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    The outcome measure reflects exams-measures of objective knowledge-that have been developed carefully over many years but never tested as a research tool, and therefore are of unknown reliability and validity.

    “The outcome measure reflects exams-measures of objective knowledge-that have been developed carefully over many years but never tested as a research tool, and therefore are of unknown reliability and validity.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Exams are measures of objective knowledge.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    It cannot be known if these results might be anticipated in other HDFS courses.

    “It cannot be known if these results might be anticipated in other HDFS courses.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Earley (2014) reviewed literature and offered generalizations that students in social science research methods classes fail to see relevance, are anxious, uninterested, unmotivated, have poor attitudes, and have significant misconceptions about research.

    “Earley (2014) reviewed published literature and offered several discouraging generalizations about students in research methods classes in the social sciences: they fail to see the relevance of the course to their major, they are anxious about the difficulty of the course, they are uninterested in the material and unmotivated to learn it, they have poor attitudes toward research, and they have sig”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Earley, 2014 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Research methods classes are not always well received by college students, and HDFS students are no exception.

    “However, research methods classes are not always wellreceived by college students (Crowe et al., 2014;Garner et al., 2009;Winn, 1995), and HDFS students are no exception.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Crowe et al., 2014

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Garner et al., 2009

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Winn, 1995 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    A significant body of work on the pedagogy of research methods instruction has emerged since Earley's 2014 review.

    “A significant body of work on the pedagogy of research methods instruction has emerged since Earley's 2014 review (Nind & Katramadou, 2023).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Nind & Katramadou, 2023

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    Both the instructor and most students were new to online learning and were in the middle of a traumatic worldwide health crisis.

    “Both the instructor and most of the students were new to online learning and were in the middle of a traumatic worldwide health crisis.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    The positive impact of a teaching assistant suggests that research methods can be difficult and that more people to help students face the challenge works to improve outcomes.

    “The positive impact of a teaching assistant suggests that research methods can be difficult and that more people to help students face the challenge works to improve outcomes.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    Every predictor variable measured was measured with a single item never tested for reliability or validity.

    “The same can be said of every predictor variable measured.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    In a criminology research methods class, several factors were negatively predictive of academic performance, but math anxiety was the only explanation that remained significant in multivariate analysis.

    “In fact, research on students in a criminology research methods class (Meldrum & Stults, 2012) found that several of these factors were negatively predictive of academic performance, but math anxiety was the only explanation that remained significant in a multivariate analysis.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Meldrum & Stults, 2012

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Other scholars have identified math anxiety as another factor in student distaste for research methods classes.

    “Other scholars have identified math anxiety as another factor in student distaste for research methods classes (e.g., Briggs et al., 2009).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Briggs et al., 2009 source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductnone given

    The current study involved only two sections of one course, taught by the same instructor, at only one university.

    “The current study is a small project, involving only two sections of one course, taught by the same instructor, at only one university.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductnone given

    The study was conducted in the context of a research methods class.

    “Finally, this study was conducted in the context of a research methods class.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    A relationship identified in such an unusual context cannot be automatically considered generally true.

    “Therefore, a relationship that is identified in such an unusual context cannot be automatically considered to be generally true.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Earley noted that individual student scores on these variables have not been directly linked to actual performance in research methods classes.

    “Earley noted that these are general descriptions of students in research methods classes, but that individual student scores on these variables have not been directly linked to actual performance in those classes, although the researchers who report these findings speculate that these negative attitudes certainly hinder learning.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Earley, 2014 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    Belief in common sense was measured with only a single item, which has never been tested for reliability or validity.

    “Belief in common sense was measured with only a single item, which has never been tested for reliability or validity.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Research methods classes are notoriously difficult and produce a lot of resistance among students in the social sciences.

    “Research methods classes are notoriously difficult and produce a lot of resistance among students in the social sciences (Earley, 2014).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Earley, 2014 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    All variables were measured as part of practice in the field rather than as a laboratory research project, and therefore have predictable limitations.

    “Because all of the variables were measured as part of practice in the field, rather than being constructed as a laboratory research project, they have some predictable limitations.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Lilienfeld argued that in psychology the immersion approach is standard practice and has demonstratively failed.

    “Lilienfeld argued that, in his discipline of psychology, this is standard practice and has demonstratively failed.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Lilienfeld (Psychological Science, 2014)

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    One explanation that remains unexplored is that students believe the social sciences, including HDFS, are mostly common sense anyway, so that research seems unnecessary.

    “One explanation that remains unexplored is that students believe the social sciences, including HDFS, are mostly common sense anyway, so that research seems unnecessary.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    Despite a large body of literature on challenges of teaching and learning research methods in higher education, very little is known about why these challenges exist in the first place.

    “Despite this large body of literature on the challenges of teaching and learning research methods in higher education, very little is known about why these challenges exist in the first place.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Very little, if any, research explores the efficacy of active or experiential learning strategies, although one study reported that undergraduate teaching assistants reduced the fail rate and produced higher grades overall in a research methods course.

    “Very little, if any, research explores the efficacy of these strategies, although one study reported that the use of undergraduate teaching assistants reduced the fail rate and produced higher grades overall in a research methods course (Crowe et al., 2014).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Crowe et al., 2014

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductnone given

    The current study took place during the first semester of obligatory online learning prompted by the COVID-19 pandemic.

    “It took place during the first semester of obligatory online learning prompted by the COVID-19 pandemic.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    Some important variables were not measured at all.

    “Furthermore, some important variables were not measured at all.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    If trained HDFS professionals resist learning things that challenge common sense, then the discipline stands little chance of improving everyday life for ordinary people.

    “If even those who are trained professionals in HDFS resist learning things that challenge common sense, then our discipline stands little chance of improving everyday life for ordinary people.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Faculty in psychology and related social sciences are clear that research methods training is essential for basic science literacy and to promote critical thinking.

    “Faculty members in psychology and related social sciences are very clear that research methods training is essential for basic science literacy (Cranney & Dunn, 2011) and to promote critical thinking (Gurung & Stoa, 2020).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Cranney & Dunn, 2011 source
    • cites Gurung & Stoa, 2020 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Most psychology faculty (79%) identify the development of scientific thinking as the most important reason for requiring a research methods class in the curriculum.

    “Most psychology faculty (79%) identify the development of scientific thinking as the most important reason for requiring a research methods class in the curriculum (Ciarocco et al., 2017).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Ciarocco et al., 2017 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    It is likely that this is a problem in many academic disciplines.

    “It is likely that this is a problem in many academic disciplines.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    To be effective, instruction must directly confront false beliefs and provide explicit instruction about how to recognize the cognitive errors that produced them.

    “To be effective, the instruction must directly confront the false beliefs, providing explicit instruction about how to recognize the cognitive errors that produced them in the first place.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Educating students about naïve realism helps them take others' perspectives and deal with conflict.

    “In addition to employing a refutational approach, there is some evidence that educating students about naïve realism, specifically, helps them to keep a more open mind (Nasie et al., 2014) and helps them take others' perspectives and deal with conflict (Smith, 2020).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Smith, 2020 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Because college students have extensive personal experiences with human development and family relationships, the problem may be especially problematic for HDFS.

    “But given that college students have extensive personal experiences with human development and with family relationships, this may be especially problematic for the discipline of HDFS.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: College students have extensive personal experiences with human development and with family relationships.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    There is no reason to believe that tactics of educating about naïve realism would not work similarly with college students.

    “These studies were conducted on high school students, but there is no reason to believe that these tactics would not work similarly with college students.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisereasoning

    Some studies report evidence of effectiveness of critical thinking instruction, and others do not.

    “Some studies report evidence of effectiveness, and others do not.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Abrami et al. suggested that the important factor in critical thinking education is not where the course is located in the curriculum, but rather the pedagogies employed by the instructor.

    “Abrami et al. (2015) suggested that the important factor is not where the course is located in the curriculum, but rather the pedagogies employed by the instructor.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Abrami et al., 2015 source
54 of 54
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The Learning Needs Survey item validly measures students' belief that HDFS is just common sense.

    “The primary predictor variable, the belief that HDFS is common sense, was measured via the Learning Needs Survey required of all students on or before the first day of class.”
    “The addition of the question about common sense was a slight adjustment made by the instructor in this case.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Exam scores validly measure mastery of course content or learning.

    “Exams were objective indicators of learning, and they excluded other sources of points in the class that reflect participation (e.g., iClicker quiz scores, written assignments) rather than mastery of course content.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Students' self-reported answers on the Learning Needs Survey accurately reflect their beliefs and circumstances.

    “Students were asked to what extent they believe that HDFS is “just common sense.””
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    GPA reflects prior academic achievement.

    “Student's GPA at the beginning of the semester was available for all enrolled students in the university's data management system and reflected the student's prior academic achievement in other courses.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The relationship between common sense belief and exam performance is not due to unmeasured confounding, so it can be interpreted as naïve realism acting as a barrier to learning.

    “supports the argument that naïve realism produces a reliance on common sense that acts as a barrier to learning.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    No prior investigations have been published exploring the relationship between belief in common sense and demonstrated learning.

    “To my knowledge, no prior investigations have been published exploring the relationship between belief in common sense and demonstrated learning.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Exams are measures of objective knowledge.

    “The outcome measure reflects exams-measures of objective knowledge-that have been developed carefully over many years but never tested as a research tool, and therefore are of unknown reliability and validity.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    College students have extensive personal experiences with human development and with family relationships.

    “But given that college students have extensive personal experiences with human development and with family relationships, this may be especially problematic for the discipline of HDFS.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Overcoming maintenance of false beliefs in advanced education is a recognized problem in higher education.

    “How, then, to overcome maintenance of false beliefs even in the midst of advanced education is a recognized problem in higher education.”
9 of 9

Statistics recomputed

Every reported test result, recomputed from its test statistic and degrees of freedom. A result shows as not adding up only once an independent check has confirmed it.

  • ConsistentF(2, 104) = 12.86reported p < .0001 · recomputed p < .001

    “F(2,104) = 12.860, p < .0001”

1 of 1

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

  • Percentage of students retaking the class is incorrect

    Minor

    The paper reports 112 registered students. Of those, 24 is 21.4%, not 19%.

    Reported 19 · recomputed 21.428571

1 of 1

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Al‐Ghadouni A. M., 2021, Instructional approaches to critical thinking: An overview of reviews, Revista Argentina de Clinica Psicologica, 30, 240
  2. Goode E., 2002, Education, scientific knowledge, and belief in the paranormal, Skeptical Inquirer, 26, 24
  3. Ross L., 1996, Values and knowledge, 103
  4. Santos M. R., 2021, Does time spent online with course material result in student success? A study for the online and face‐to‐face courses, Journal of Instructional Pedagogies, 25, 1
  5. Watts D. J., 2011, Everything is obvious: How common sense fails us

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dyer, K. D.
Affiliations
California State University, Fresno (US)
Corresponding author
Dyer, Kathleen D.
Venue
Family Relations
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2023-11-16
Volume
73
Issue
3
Pages
2064-2078
ISSN
  • 0197-6664 (ISSN-L)
  • 1741-3729
OpenAlex
W4388731375
Cited by
2
References
61
Citations by year
2025: 2
FWCI
0.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Family Relations (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational Strategies and Epistemologies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
  • Social Sciences › Education › Evaluation of Teaching Practices
Keywords
naive realism, common sense, barriers to learning, research methodology training, academic performance, prior academic achievement, cognitive biases, student beliefs, higher education

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-23.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-23.

Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review