The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Self-undermining behavior at work: Evidence of construct and predictive validity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“Bakker and Wang (2019) found that employees with higher scores on burnout (exhaustion and cynicism) were more likely to show self-undermining behaviors (visible to others).”
From Job Demands—Resources theory and self-regulation: New explanations and remedies for job burnout (2021) · cites this paper as Bakker & Wang, 2019
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredIn the citing paper
“We consider avoidance coping and self-undermining as self-regulation strategies that are generally maladaptive.”
From Job Demands—Resources theory and self-regulation: New explanations and remedies for job burnout (2021) · cites this paper as Bakker & Wang, 2019
In the citing paper
“In contrast, employees who experience job strain will start to undermine their own functioning at work (Bakker & Costa, 2014;Bakker & Wang, 2019).”
From Job Demands—Resources theory and self-regulation: New explanations and remedies for job burnout (2021) · cites this paper as Bakker & Wang, 2019
In the citing paper
“they found a negative relationship between self-undermining and job performance.”
From Job Demands—Resources theory and self-regulation: New explanations and remedies for job burnout (2021) · cites this paper as Bakker & Wang, 2019
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Social and Psychological Resources and Adaptation
Hobfoll, S. E. (2002) · Review of General Psychology · doi:10.1037/1089-2680.6.4.307 · Cited by 4,594 · cited 1×
“In the most recent version of JD-R theory (Bakker & Demerouti, 2017), the abovementioned phenomenon is referred to as a “loss cycle” (cf. Hobfoll, 2002).”
MethodA Review of Scale Development Practices in the Study of Organizations
Hinkin, T. R. (1995) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/014920639502100509 · Cited by 3,193
Lepine, J. A., Podsakoff, N. P., & Lepine, M. A. (2005) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2005.18803921 · Cited by 2,438
Ahola, K., Väänänen, A., Koskinen, A., Kouvonen, A., & Shirom, A. (2010) · Journal of Psychosomatic Research · doi:10.1016/j.jpsychores.2010.01.002 · Cited by 241
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Job Demands—Resources theory and self-regulation: New explanations and remedies for job burnout
Bakker, A. B., & de Vries, J. D. (2021) · Anxiety, Stress, & Coping · doi:10.1080/10615806.2020.1797695 · Cited by 1,131
Metadata
- Authors
- Bakker, A. B., & Wang, Y.
- ORCID
- Bakker, Arnold B.
- Venue
- International Journal of Stress Management
- Published
- 2020-08
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 241-251
- ISSN
- 1573-3424
- 1072-5245
- Cited by
- 69
- References
- 4
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
