Cited by 1,131Stress and Burnout ResearchJob Satisfaction and Organizational BehaviorWorkplace Health and Well-being

Job Demands—Resources theory and self-regulation: New explanations and remedies for job burnout

Open access
Bakker, Arnold B., de Vries, Juriena D.·2021·Anxiety, Stress, & Coping

Abstract

Background: High job demands and low job resources may cause job strain and eventually result in burnout. However, previous research has generally ignored the roles of time and self-regulation.Objectives: This theoretical article synthesizes the literature to propose a multilevel model that delineates how acute job strain translates into enduring and severe job burnout.Methods: We integrate self-regulation perspectives in job demands-resources (JD-R) theory to propose that short-term job strain and eventually enduring burnout is the result of consistently high job demands and low job resources – combined with failed self-regulation.Results: The model shows that when employees are confronted with increased job strain, they are more likely to use maladaptive self-regulation strategies, such as coping inflexibility and self-undermining. In addition, when job strain increases, employees are less likely to use adaptive self-regulation strategies, such as job stress recovery and job crafting. It follows that when the job becomes more stressful, stable resources become more important. Organizational resources such as human resource practices and healthy leadership may help employees to regulate their short-term fatigue and avoid enduring burnout. Furthermore, key personal resources like emotional intelligence and proactive personality may help employees to recognize and regulate their fatigue in an effective way.Conclusion: The proposed model of burnout expands JD-R theory and offers important practical implications for the prevention and reduction of burnout.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10615806.2020.1797695

Cites

127 of 129 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2018). Multiple levels in job demands-resources theory: Implications for employee well- being and performance. In E. Diener, S. Oishi, & L. Tay (Eds.), Handbook of well-being (pp. 1-13). DEF Publishers.
  2. Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., & Xanthopoulou, D. (2020). Too burned-out to deal with weekly job demands? A multilevel approach of employee well-being, coping, and self-undermining. Manuscript under review.
  3. str0000108 · DOI
  4. ch7 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bakker, A. B., & de Vries, J. D.
Affiliations
  • Erasmus University Rotterdam (NL)
  • Center of Excellence for Positive Organizational Psychology, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
Corresponding author
Bakker, Arnold B.
Venue
Anxiety, Stress, & Coping
Published
2020-08-28
Volume
34
Issue
1
Pages
1-21
ISSN
  • 1061-5806 (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-2205
OpenAlex
W3082353819
Cited by
1,131
References
127
Citations by year
2026: 258 · 2025: 238 · 2024: 236 · 2023: 187 · 2022: 146 · 2021: 63 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1
FWCI
16.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Anxiety Stress & Coping (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • RePub (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Stress and Burnout Research
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Workplace Health and Well-being
Keywords
burnout, job demands-resources model, self-regulation, job strain, job crafting, emotional intelligence, proactive personality, human resource management practices, leadership, burnout prevention, multilevel models
MeSH terms
Self-Control, Occupational Stress, Adaptation, Psychological, Burnout, Professional, Humans, Job Satisfaction, Surveys and Questionnaires, Workload

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review