Cited by 887

Barthel Index

Mahoney, Florence I., Barthel, Dorothea W.·2013·PsycTESTS Dataset

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/t02366-000

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A sample size of 23 subjects was needed to test inter-rater reliability of the EFS using the kappa coefficient, assuming excellent agreement was indicated by a value of ≥0.80.

    “To test inter-rater reliability of the EFS using the kappa coefficient (k) and assuming that excellent agreement was indicated by a value of ≥0.80, we calculated a requirement of 23 subjects [12].”

    From Validity and reliability of the Edmonton Frail Scale (2006) · cites this paper as [12]

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

Cited by 887

Authors
Mahoney, F. I., & Barthel, D. W.
Venue
PsycTESTS Dataset
Published
1965
OpenAlex
W4211016789
Cited by
887
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 100 · 2025: 90 · 2024: 113 · 2023: 83 · 2022: 82 · 2021: 101 · 2020: 51 · 2019: 39 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 11
Type
dataset
Language
fr
Open access
closed
Locations
PsycTESTS Dataset (publishedVersion)
Keywords
Barthel Index, activities of daily living, functional disability, activities of daily living assessment, motor function, activities of daily living scale

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review