CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 650Attachment and Relationship DynamicsChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentPsychological Testing and Assessment

The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year.

Strange Situation Procedure

Ainsworth, Mary D. Salter, Blehar, Mary C., Waters, Everett, Wall, Sally·2014·PsycTESTS Dataset
DOI 10.1037/t28248-000
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/t28248-000

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 501–600 of 650

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Ainsworth, M. D. S., Blehar, M. C., Waters, E., & Wall, S.
ORCID
Waters, Everett
Venue
PsycTESTS Dataset
Publisher
American Psychological Association (APA)
Published
1978
DOI
10.1037/t28248-000
OpenAlex
W4230085981
Cited by
641
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 98 · 2025: 100 · 2024: 66 · 2023: 75 · 2022: 60 · 2021: 53 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 3
Type
dataset
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
PsycTESTS Dataset (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
Keywords
attachment, attachment security, infant attachment, separation and reunion, stranger anxiety

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review