The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Scale for the Assessment of Positive Symptoms
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Sweeney, J. A., Kmiec, J. A., & Kupfer, D. J. (2000) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/s0006-3223(00)00910-0 · Cited by 461
Evidence of a dimensional relationship between schizotypy and schizophrenia: A systematic review
Nelson, M. T., Seal, M. L., Pantelis, C., & Phillips, L. J. (2013) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2013.01.004 · Cited by 334
The 20-Year Longitudinal Trajectories of Social Functioning in Individuals With Psychotic Disorders
Velthorst, E., Fett, A.-K. J., Reichenberg, A., Perlman, G., van Os, J., Bromet, E. J., & Kotov, R. (2017) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2016.15111419 · Cited by 309
The role of sleep dysfunction in the occurrence of delusions and hallucinations: A systematic review
Reeve, S., Sheaves, B., & Freeman, D. (2015) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2015.09.001 · Cited by 273
Corollary discharge dysfunction in schizophrenia: Can it explain auditory hallucinations?
Ford, J. M., & Mathalon, D. H. (2005) · International Journal of Psychophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2005.01.014 · Cited by 267
Metadata
- Authors
- Andreasen, N. C.
- Venue
- PsycTESTS Dataset
- Published
- 1986
- OpenAlex
- W2808057378
- Cited by
- 502
- References
- 0
- Type
- dataset
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Scale for the Assessment of Positive Symptoms. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037/t48377-000
- The paper
- Andreasen, N. C. (2018). Scale for the Assessment of Positive Symptoms. PsycTESTS Dataset. https://doi.org/10.1037/t48377-000
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
