The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Cognitive Fusion Questionnaire--Italian Version
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The Italian version of I-CFQ is a 7-item questionnaire administered for the assessment of cognitive fusion, with internal consistency α .82.
“The Italian version [45] is a 7-item questionnaire administered for the assessment of cognitive fusion. The internal consistency of the Italian version is excellent (α = .82).”
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Guerrini Usubini, A., Cattivelli, R., Giusti, E. M., Riboni, F. V., Varallo, G., Pietrabissa, G., Manzoni, G. M., Consoli, S., Bastoni, I., Granese, V., et al. (2021) · Trials · doi:10.1186/s13063-021-05191-y · Cited by 14
Metadata
- Authors
- Oppo, A., Prevedini, A. B., Dell'Orco, F., Dordoni, P., Presti, G., Gillanders, D. T., & Moderato, P.
- ORCID
- Venue
- PsycTESTS Dataset
- Published
- 2019
- OpenAlex
- W4244921844
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2021: 1
- Type
- dataset
- Language
- fr
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- PsycTESTS Dataset (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Keywords
- cognitive fusion, Cognitive Fusion Questionnaire, Italian translation, acceptance and commitment therapy, psychological flexibility, experiential avoidance
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
