The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year.
Women of color and mentorship in graduate training.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Students often feel exploited, especially when their labor goes unrecognized, and they feel powerless to end the relationship.
“Students often feel exploited, especially when their labor goes unrecognized, and they feel powerless to end the relationship (Johnson and Huwe 2002;Remaker et al. 2019;Robinson et al. 2019).”
From “The Future of Archaeology Is Antiracist”: Archaeology in the Time of Black Lives Matter (2021) · cites this paper as Remaker et al. 2019
Studies have shown that attrition commonly stems from negative mentoring relationships, which are especially harmful to students of color.
“Studies have shown that attrition commonly stems from negative mentoring relationships, which are especially harmful to students of color (Johnson and Huwe 2002;Remaker et al. 2019;Robinson et al. 2019).”
From “The Future of Archaeology Is Antiracist”: Archaeology in the Time of Black Lives Matter (2021) · cites this paper as Remaker et al. 2019
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
“The Future of Archaeology Is Antiracist”: Archaeology in the Time of Black Lives Matter
Flewellen, A. O., Dunnavant, J. P., Odewale, A., Jones, A., Wolde-Michael, T., Crossland, Z., & Franklin, M. (2021) · American Antiquity · doi:10.1017/aaq.2021.18 · Cited by 151
Metadata
- Authors
- Remaker, D. N., Gonzalez, M. M., Houston-Armstrong, T., & Sprague-Connors, G.
- Venue
- Training and Education in Professional Psychology
- Published
- 2021-02
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 70-75
- ISSN
- 1931-3926
- 1931-3918
- Cited by
- 14
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
