Cited by 4Counseling Practices and SupervisionCultural Competency in Health CareInternational Student and Expatriate Challenges

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Effects of training on multicultural case conceptualization skills.

Sahu, Ankita, Ridley, Charles R.·2024·Training and Education in Professional Psychology

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/tep0000475

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 4

Metadata

Authors
Sahu, A., & Ridley, C. R.
Venue
Training and Education in Professional Psychology
Published
2024-05
Volume
18
Issue
2
Pages
130-141
ISSN
  • 1931-3918 (ISSN-L)
  • 1931-3926
OpenAlex
W4392926966
Cited by
4
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1
FWCI
1.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Training and Education in Professional Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Counseling Practices and Supervision
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Cultural Competency in Health Care
  • Social Sciences › Communication › International Student and Expatriate Challenges
Keywords
multicultural counseling, training effects, cultural competence, psychotherapy training

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review