CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 2Counseling Practices and SupervisionGlobal Education and MulticulturalismCultural Competency in Health Care

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 51 of the 51 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

SEEK: a multicultural framework for teaching clinical case conceptualization

Steele, Janeé M.·2026·Counselling Psychology Quarterly
DOI 10.1080/09515070.2025.2561161
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This article introduces the SEEK training model, a pedagogical framework designed to enhance multicultural case conceptualization during graduate training. Grounded in critical pedagogy and experiential learning, SEEK guides trainees in integrating sociocultural identity, environmental and systemic influences, emotional and cognitive narratives, and knowledge of cultural strengths into clinical reasoning. An instructional case example illustrates its application in a counseling theory course, with attention to learning environment considerations and implications for future research.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/09515070.2025.2561161

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. 10.1007/s44239-024-00033-1 · DOI
  2. Beck, J. S. (2020). Cognitive behavior therapy: Basics and beyond (3rd ed.). Guilford Press.
  3. Constantine, M. G., & Ladany, N. (2001). New visions for defining and assessing multicultural counseling competence. In J. G. Ponterotto, J. M. Casas, L. A. Suzuki, & C. M. Alexander (Eds.), Handbook of multicultural counseling (pp. 482–498). Sage.
  4. Eells, T. D. (2022). History and current status of psychotherapy case formulation. In T. D. Eells (Ed.), Handbook of psychotherapy case formulation (3rd ed., pp. 1–35). The Guilford Press.
  5. Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Seabury Press.
  6. Freire, P. (2017). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Penguin Classics.
  7. Ingram, B. L. (2012). Clinical case formulations: Matching the integrative treatment plan to the client (2nd ed.). John Wiley & Sons.
  8. Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Prentice-Hall.
  9. Kolb, D. A. (2015). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development (2nd ed.). Prentice-Hall.
  10. Sue, D. W., Sue, D., Neville, H. A., & Smith, L. (2022). Counseling the culturally diverse: Theory and practice (9th ed.). Wiley.
  11. 10.7729/51.0011 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Metadata

Authors
Steele, J. M.
Affiliations
Walden University (US)
Corresponding author
Steele, Janeé M.
ORCID
Steele, Janeé M.
Venue
Counselling Psychology Quarterly
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2025-09-13
Volume
39
Issue
3
Pages
488-510
ISSN
  • 0951-5070 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-3674
DOI
10.1080/09515070.2025.2561161
OpenAlex
W7081914874
Cited by
2
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 2
FWCI
1.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
doi.org/10.1080/policies-text-data-mining (tdm)
Locations
Counselling Psychology Quarterly (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Counseling Practices and Supervision
  • Social Sciences › Education › Global Education and Multiculturalism
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Cultural Competency in Health Care
Keywords
critical pedagogy, experiential learning, sociocultural identity, systemic effects, cultural strengths, clinical reasoning, learning environment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review