“Making America great again”: System justification in the U.S. presidential election of 2016.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In 2016, Donald Trump supporters were more likely to justify economic inequality under capitalism and gender disparities under the patriarchal social order, in comparison with supporters of Hillary Clinton, but they were not more likely to justify the general social system in the USA following eight years of Barack Obama's presidency.
“in 2016, Donald Trump supporters were more likely to justify economic inequality under capitalism and gender disparities under the patriarchal social order, in comparison with supporters of Hillary Clinton, but they were not more likely to justify the general social system in the USA following eight years of Barack Obama’s presidency284.”
From Cognitive–motivational mechanisms of political polarization in social-communicative contexts (2022) · cites this paper as [284]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 14 · Cited by 77
- Authors
- Azevedo, F., Jost, J. T., & Rothmund, T.
- Affiliations
- University of Cologne (DE)
- New York University (US)
- University of Koblenz and Landau (DE)
- Venue
- Translational Issues in Psychological Science
- Published
- 2017-09
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 231-240
- ISSN
- 2332-2136 (ISSN-L)
- 2332-2179
- OpenAlex
- W2757206094
- Cited by
- 77
- References
- 14
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 2
- FWCI
- 18.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Translational Issues in Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- New York University
- Technische Universität Darmstadt
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Electoral Systems and Political Participation
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Populism, Right-Wing Movements
- Keywords
- system justification, 2016 US presidential election, Donald Trump, political attitudes
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
