Cited by 16Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesVirtual Reality Applications and ImpactsDigital Mental Health Interventions

Virtual Reality Exposure in Cognitive Behavioral Group Therapy for Social Anxiety Disorder: A Qualitative Evaluation Based on Patients’ and Therapists’ Experiences

Arnfred, Benjamin Thorup, Bang, Peter, Winther Davy, Josefine, Larsen, Lene Qvist, Hjorthøj, Carsten, Christensen, Anne Bryde·2021·Translational Issues in Psychological Science

Abstract

Social anxiety disorder (SAD) is a highly prevalent and impairing disorder. Current best practice is cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), but there are several challenges associated with performing exposure therapy. Virtual reality exposure (VRE) may improve treatment efficacy of SAD in a group therapy context, because it allows for greater control, flexibility, and individualization of the exposure stimuli. However, to date no study has investigated the use of VRE for SAD in a group context. In the present study, nine patients who had undergone group CBT with VRE for SAD and three therapists responsible for the treatment were interviewed about their experiences. The objective of the study was to investigate the practical and therapeutic challenges of using VRE in a group therapy context. Thematic analysis was used to analyze the data. The results showed that it was difficult for the patients to engage with the VRE in a group therapy context and that there were several practical challenges. However, all participants found the VRE exercises to be meaningful, because it gave them a medium to practice and understand typically avoided social situations. The latter has not previously been described as a treatment mechanism for anxiety through virtual reality. However, the appropriateness of VRE in group therapy remains unclear. Implications are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/tps0000291

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Arnfred, B. T., Bang, P., Winther Davy, J., Larsen, L. Q., Hjorthøj, C., & Christensen, A. B.
Affiliations
University of Copenhagen (DK)
Venue
Translational Issues in Psychological Science
Published
2021-09
Volume
7
Issue
3
Pages
229-247
ISSN
  • 2332-2136 (ISSN-L)
  • 2332-2179
OpenAlex
W4206047394
Cited by
16
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2
FWCI
2.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Translational Issues in Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
Keywords
virtual reality exposure therapy, social anxiety disorder, group cognitive behavioral therapy, exposure therapy, patient experience, therapist experience, treatment engagement, social avoidance, therapeutic mechanisms

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review