Cited by 45Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchResilience and Mental HealthMemory, History, Trauma, Identity

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The moderating effect of psychological flexibility on event centrality in determining trauma outcomes

Open access
Boykin, Derrecka M., Anyanwu, Jacinta, Calvin, Krystle, Orcutt, Holly K.·2020·Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Emerging research shows that event centrality, or the degree to which trauma is perceived as integral to one's worldviews and personal identity, has a substantial impact on trauma recovery. Given that high centrality fosters both distress and growth, additional research on potential moderators that could better distinguish the course of adjustment is needed. This study examined whether differences in psychological flexibility (or the ability to persist in a behavior despite urges to do otherwise) impacted posttraumatic stress symptoms (PTS) and perceived posttraumatic growth (PTG) as event centrality increased. METHOD: One-hundred and 25 college students (52% female) with a history of trauma exposure were recruited from a large Midwestern university. Participants completed an electronic survey for course credit. RESULTS: There was a significant interaction between event centrality and psychological flexibility on PTS severity (B = 2.10, p = .003). A simple slopes analysis revealed that low psychological flexibility was associated with greater PTS severity as event centrality increased. Although event centrality and psychological flexibility independently predicted perceived PTG, no interaction effect was observed (B = -4.68, p = .080). CONCLUSION: This suggests that while differences in psychological flexibility may influence PTS severity following highly centralized traumatic experiences it has a more complicated relationship with perceived PTG that requires further investigation. Clinical implications are discussed. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/tra0000490

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Boykin, D. M., Anyanwu, J., Calvin, K., & Orcutt, H. K.
Affiliations
  • Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center (US)
  • Minnesota State Colleges and Universities System (US)
  • Northern Illinois University (US)
Venue
Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy
Published
2020-02
Volume
12
Issue
2
Pages
193-199
ISSN
  • 1942-9681 (ISSN-L)
  • 1942-969X
OpenAlex
W2957804443
Cited by
45
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6
FWCI
4.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychological Trauma Theory Research Practice and Policy (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Department of Veterans Affairs
  • South Central Mental Illness Research, Education, and Clinical Center
  • Center of Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness and Safety (CIN 13-413)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Resilience and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Memory, History, Trauma, Identity
Keywords
psychological flexibility, event centrality, posttraumatic stress symptoms, posttraumatic growth, trauma exposure, moderating effect, university students, trauma recovery, personal identity
MeSH terms
Psychological Trauma, Posttraumatic Growth, Psychological, Adolescent, Adult, Female, Humans, Individuality, Male, Self Concept, Severity of Illness Index, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review