Cited by 21Resilience and Mental HealthMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationOptimism, Hope, and Well-being

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

A qualitative exploration of resilience among patients living with chronic pain

Open access

Abstract

An estimated 100 million Americans are living with chronic pain. The majority of the chronic pain literature focuses on the biological impact of the condition and very little attention is given to patients' lived experience with chronic pain and the enactment of their resiliency. Yet, resiliency may play a critical role in patients' experience of pain intensity as well as self-efficacy to manage their pain. The main objective of this study was to explore the origin and enactment of resiliency across a sample of 12 chronic pain patients. In-depth phone interviews were conducted, and data were analyzed using thematic analysis. Results indicate that patients exhibited resiliency in four ways: (1) developing a sense of control - independently seeking information and cross-checking this information with their doctors' recommendations (2) active engagement in medical and complementary treatment; (3) establishing social connections; and (4) exhibiting pain acceptance and positive affect. This study lays the foundation to explore whether resiliency improves clinical outcomes among patients living with chronic pain. The findings support the need for clinicians to evaluate and treat chronic pain patients through the lens of resiliency.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/trm0000095

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Programs centered on self-compassion may increase acceptance with the added benefits of a sense of common humanity and reduced rumination both of which have been shown to relate to resilience and reduced pain catastrophizing.

    “Nevertheless, programs centered on self-compassion may increase acceptance with the added benefits of a sense of common humanity and reduced rumination (Ferrari et al., 2019) both of which have been shown to relate to resilience and reduced pain catastrophizing (Arnow et al., 2011; Rolbiecki et al., 2017).”
  • In a qualitative review of resilience in pain groups, patients successfully exhibited resilience by establishing social connections and demonstrating pain acceptance and positive affect.

    “In a qualitative review of resilience in pain groups, patients successfully exhibited resilience by establishing social connections and demonstrating pain acceptance and positive affect (Rolbiecki et al., 2017).”

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Rolbiecki, A., Subramanian, R., Crenshaw, B., Albright, D. L., Perreault, M., & Mehr, D.
Affiliations
  • University of Missouri (US)
  • University of Alabama (US)
Venue
Traumatology
Published
2017-03
Volume
23
Issue
1
Pages
89-94
ISSN
1085-9373 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2523236321
Cited by
21
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1
FWCI
1.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Traumatology An International Journal (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Digital Commons - University of South Florida (University of South Florida) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (R24HS022140)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Resilience and Mental Health
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Optimism, Hope, and Well-being
Keywords
chronic pain, resilience, lived experience, perceived control, complementary therapy, social connectedness, pain acceptance, positive affect, self-efficacy, patient-clinician communication

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review