Cited by 215Intimate Partner and Family ViolenceSexual Assault and Victimization StudiesLGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy

Sexual violence, stalking, and intimate partner violence by sexual orientation, United States.

Open access
Chen, Jieru, Walters, Mikel L., Gilbert, Leah K., Patel, Nimesh·2020·Psychology of Violence

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study is to assess the prevalence of sexual violence, stalking, and intimate partner violence (IPV) across sexual orientation groups among U.S. adults. METHOD: = 41,174) of English- or Spanish-speaking noninstitutionalized U.S. adults were interviewed to assess the prevalence of violence and injury as part of the National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey. National estimates across sexual orientation groups were compared. RESULTS: Compared with heterosexual women, both bisexual women and lesbians experienced more contact sexual violence (CSV) and noncontact unwanted sexual violence by any perpetrator. In addition, bisexual women experienced more stalking by any perpetrator, IPV, and IPV-related impact than did heterosexual women. Compared with lesbians, bisexual women reported more CSV and stalking by any perpetrator, IPV, and IPV-related impact. Compared with heterosexual men, both bisexual and gay men experienced more CSV and noncontact unwanted sexual violence, and gay men experienced more stalking. Although there were no detected statistically significant differences in the prevalence of IPV overall, gay men did report more IPV-related impacts compared with heterosexual men. CONCLUSION: Results reveal a significantly elevated burden of violence experienced by certain sexual minorities.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/vio0000252

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Among sexual minority individuals, those who identify as bisexual experience the highest rates of violence compared to individuals who are heterosexual, gay, or lesbian.

    “Additionally, some research suggests that among sexual minority individuals, those who identify as bisexual (who could presumably be enrolled in studies of male violence against women) experience the highest rates of violence (Chen, Walters, Gilbert, & Patel, 2020) compared to individuals who are heterosexual, gay, or lesbian.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chen, J., Walters, M. L., Gilbert, L. K., & Patel, N.
Affiliations
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US)
Venue
Psychology of Violence
Published
2020-01
Volume
10
Issue
1
Pages
110-119
ISSN
  • 2152-081X (ISSN-L)
  • 2152-0828
OpenAlex
W2966395184
Cited by
215
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 29 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 49 · 2023: 51 · 2022: 40 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 6
FWCI
15.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychology of Violence (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (CC999999)
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
Keywords
sexual violence, stalking, intimate partner violence, sexual orientation, bisexual women, lesbians, gay men, heterosexual women, sexual minorities, prevalence of violence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review