The effects of prequestions on classroom learning.
Abstract
Studies have shown that prequestions-asking students questions before they learn something-benefit memory retention. Prequestions would seem to be a useful technique for enhancing students' learning in their courses, but classroom investigations of prequestions have been sparse. In the current study, students from an introductory psychology course were randomly assigned to receive prequestions over each upcoming lesson (prequestion group) or to not receive prequestions (control group). At the end of class, students in the prequestion group remembered the material better than students in the control group, but this benefit was specific to the information that was asked about in the prequestions. When memory for other, nonprequestioned portions of the lesson were tested at the end of class, the prequestion group performed similarly to the control group. On a follow-up quiz 1 week later, both groups showed a memory advantage for material that was tested at the end of class 1 week prior, compared with information from the same lesson that was never tested. However, this benefit was comparable between the prequestion group and the control group, suggesting that students benefit from retrieval practice, but prequestions add little, if any, enhancement to this effect. (PsycINFO Database Record
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In those two studies, on delayed assessments, students performed no better on items introduced as prequestions and then postquestions than on items only presented as postquestions.
“On delayed assessments, students performed no better on items that had been introduced as prequestions (and then again as postquestions) when compared with items that had only been presented as postquestions at the end of lectures.”
From ManyClasses 2: The effects of prequestions on media interactions and learning. (2026) · cites this paper as Carpenter, Rahman, & Perkins, 2018
Studies conducted in authentic education environments have produced scant and inconsistent evidence of benefits of prequestions.
“but studies conducted in authentic education environments have produced scant and inconsistent evidence of such bene fi ts.”
From ManyClasses 2: The effects of prequestions on media interactions and learning. (2026) · cites this paper as Carpenter, Rahman, & Perkins, 2018
In the two experiments where no prequestion effect was observed, the classes also included additional interactive elements.
“In the two experiments where no prequestion effect was observed, the classes also included additional interactive elements (team-based learning activities in Geller et al., 2017; and postquestions in Carpenter, Rahman, & Perkins, 2018), and this has led researchers to reasonably assume that the effect of prequestions may be muf fl ed by other concomitant learning activities.”
From ManyClasses 2: The effects of prequestions on media interactions and learning. (2026) · cites this paper as Carpenter, Rahman, & Perkins, 2018
Of contemporary experimental studies conducted in authentic education settings, one observed benefits of prequestions for student learning, while two observed no reliable benefit.
“Of the contemporary experimental studies conducted in authentic education settings, one has observed bene fi ts of prequestions for student learning (Soderstrom & Bjork, 2023), while two have observed no reliable bene fi t (Carpenter, Rahman, & Perkins, 2018; Geller et al., 2017).”
From ManyClasses 2: The effects of prequestions on media interactions and learning. (2026) · cites this paper as Carpenter, Rahman, & Perkins, 2018
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Pan, S. C., & Carpenter, S. K. (2023) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-023-09814-5 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
Self-citationThe limited effects of prequestions on learning from authentic lecture videos
Toftness, A. R., Carpenter, S. K., Lauber, S., & Mickes, L. (2018) · Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.jarmac.2018.06.003 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Self-citationManyClasses 2: The effects of prequestions on media interactions and learning.
Motz, B. A., Chinni, A., de Leeuw, J. R., Jankowski, H. E., Aggarwal, A., Amato, M., Berlin, K., Britten, K., Brown, A., Cerchiaro, M. L., et al. (2026) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/edu0000978 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
The Effect of Prequestions on Learning: A Multilevel Meta-Analysis
King-Shepard, Q. W., Walker, J., Nokes-Malach, T. J., Carpenter, S. K., & Fraundorf, S. H. (2025) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-025-10075-7 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Carpenter, S. K., Rahman, S., & Perkins, K.
- Affiliations
- Iowa State University (US)
- ORCID
- Carpenter, Shana K.
- Venue
- Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied
- Published
- 2018-03
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 34-42
- ISSN
- 1076-898X (ISSN-L)
- 1939-2192
- OpenAlex
- W2770099805
- Cited by
- 46
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 2.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Experimental Psychology Applied (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
- Social Sciences › Education › Innovative Teaching Methods
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
- Keywords
- retrieval practice, memory retention, classroom learning, student questioning, introductory psychology course, long-term retention
- MeSH terms
- Cognition, Educational Measurement, Humans, Learning, Random Allocation, Mental Recall, Retention, Psychology, Students, Teaching, Time Factors
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review