Cited by 166RNA and protein synthesis mechanismsBacterial Genetics and BiotechnologyDNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry

A strong suppressor specific for UGA

SAMBROOK, J. F., FAN, D. P., BRENNER, S.·1967·Nature

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/214452a0

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • UGA is the leakiest of the three stop codons, with a readthrough frequency of at least 10−2 to 10−3 in Salmonella typhimurium and E. coli.

    “UGA is the leakiest of the three, with a readthrough frequency of at least 10−2 to 10−3 in Salmonella typhimurium [66] and E. coli {XE “E. coli”} [67,68].”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
SAMBROOK, J. F., FAN, D. P., & BRENNER, S.
Affiliations
MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology (GB)
Venue
Nature
Published
1967-04
Volume
214
Issue
5087
Pages
452-453
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W2031580581
Cited by
166
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 7 · 2016: 3 · 2013: 1
FWCI
11.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry
Keywords
UGA codon, suppressors, nonsense suppression, Escherichia coli, codon recognition, translation termination
MeSH terms
Amino Acid Sequence, Coliphages, Escherichia coli, Genetic Code

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review