Cited by 165Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchParkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments

Effects of Amphetamine on Single Cell Activity in a Catecholamine Nucleus, the Locus Coeruleus

GRAHAM, ALLAN W., AGHAJANIAN, GEORGE K.·1971·Nature

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/234100b0

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
GRAHAM, A. W., & AGHAJANIAN, G. K.
Affiliations
Yale University (US)
Venue
Nature
Published
1971-11
Volume
234
Issue
5324
Pages
100-102
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W1996635788
Cited by
165
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
Keywords
amphetamine, locus coeruleus, catecholamine release, single-unit activity, product inhibition, catecholamine stores, presynaptic terminals
MeSH terms
Action Potentials, Amphetamine, Animals, Catecholamines, Cerebral Ventricles, Chlorpromazine, Electrodes, Implanted, Injections, Intravenous, Male, Microscopy, Fluorescence, Neurons, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review