The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Hearing lips and seeing voices
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In the McGurk effect, perceptual identification of auditory speech syllables is influenced by simultaneous presentation of discrepant visible speech syllables.”
From The McGurk effect in infants (1997) · cites this paper as McGurk & MacDonald, 1976
In the citing paper
“the phenomenon known as the McGurk effect demonstrates that neither informational stream can be ignored”
From The McGurk effect in infants (1997) · cites this paper as McGurk & MacDonald, 1976
In the citing paper
“The salience ofaudiovisual speech is also evidenced in findings which show that its integration is automatic.”
From The McGurk effect in infants (1997) · cites this paper as McGurk & MacDonald, 1976
In the citing paper
“For some audiovisual tokens, however, the younger children displayed as many fused responses as adults did.”
From The McGurk effect in infants (1997) · cites this paper as McGurk & MacDonald, 1976
In the citing paper
“McGurk and MacDonald (1976) reported that two groups of English-speaking children (3-5 years and 7-8 years old) displayed a smaller overall visual influence than did adult subjects.”
From The McGurk effect in infants (1997) · cites this paper as McGurk & MacDonald, 1976
In the citing paper
“The developmental research suggests that for many stimuli, the strength ofthe McGurk effect increases through childhood (e.g., Boliek et al., 1996;Massaro, 1987;McGurk & MacDonald, 1976).”
From The McGurk effect in infants (1997) · cites this paper as McGurk & MacDonald, 1976
In the citing paper
“It is based on the premise that sensory stimuli that occur in close temporal proximity are more likely to be integrated and perceived as emanating from the same source; thus, timing information is crucial to binding and integrating associated stimuli (Shams et al., 2000, McGurk and Macdonald, 1976, Stevenson et al., 2012).”
From The impact of atypical sensory processing on social impairments in autism spectrum disorder (2018) · cites this paper as McGurk and Macdonald, 1976
In the citing paper
“Speech perception is intrinsically bimodal, as shown several decades ago by the famous McGurk effect [2] that human speech perception depends not only on auditory information, but also on visual cues like lip movements.”
From Deep learning for visual speech analysis: A survey (2024) · cites this paper as [2]
Citations
Cites
The Role of Selected Stimulus-Variables in the Perception of the Unvoiced Stop Consonants
Liberman, A. M., Delattre, P. C., & Cooper, F. S. (1952) · The American Journal of Psychology · doi:10.2307/1418032 · Cited by 419
Auditory and Visual Contributions to the Perception of Consonants
Binnie, C. A., Montgomery, A. A., & Jackson, P. L. (1974) · Journal of Speech and Hearing Research · doi:10.1044/jshr.1704.619 · Cited by 197
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The faculty of language: what is it, who has it, and how did it evolve?
Hauser, M. D., Chomsky, N., & Fitch, W. T. (2002) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.298.5598.1569 · Cited by 5,189
Multimodal Machine Learning: A Survey and Taxonomy
Baltrusaitis, T., Ahuja, C., & Morency, L.-P. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2018.2798607 · Cited by 5,018
The distributed human neural system for face perception
Haxby, J. V., Hoffman, E. A., & Gobbini, M. I. (2000) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/s1364-6613(00)01482-0 · Cited by 4,891
Jackendoff, R. S. (2002) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198270126.001.0001 · Cited by 4,542
Understanding face recognition
Bruce, V., & Young, A. (1986) · British Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.2044-8295.1986.tb02199.x · Cited by 4,067
Metadata
- Authors
- MCGURK, H., & MACDONALD, J.
- Affiliations
- University of Surrey (GB)
- ORCID
- MACDONALD, JOHN
- Venue
- Nature
- Published
- 1976-12
- Volume
- 264
- Issue
- 5588
- Pages
- 746-748
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4687
- OpenAlex
- W2015394094
- Cited by
- 6,183
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 144 · 2025: 183 · 2024: 218 · 2023: 217 · 2022: 276 · 2021: 249 · 2020: 259 · 2019: 311 · 2018: 268 · 2017: 259 · 2016: 268 · 2015: 273 · 2014: 260 · 2013: 249 · 2012: 246
- FWCI
- 7.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Nature (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Multisensory perception and integration
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Phonetics and Phonology Research
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Speech and Audio Processing
- Keywords
- speech perception, visual speech, lip reading, audiovisual speech integration, syllable perception
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Age Factors, Auditory Perception, Child, Child, Preschool, Female, Humans, Illusions, Male, Speech, Visual Perception
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review