Cited by 396Avian ecology and behaviorAnimal Behavior and ReproductionWildlife Ecology and Conservation

Optimal foraging in great tits (parus major)

COWIE, RICHARD J.·1977·Nature

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/268137a0

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Rate estimation is usually implemented by a weighted average with exponential decay.

    “Rate estimation is usually implemented by a weighted average with exponential decay (Killeen, 1981, 1994), which captures the intuitive notion that because natural environments are nonstationary, recent events should weigh more heavily in memory than long-past events (Cowie, 1977).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
COWIE, R. J.
Affiliations
University of Oxford (GB)
Corresponding author
COWIE, RICHARD J.
Venue
Nature
Published
1977-07
Volume
268
Issue
5616
Pages
137-139
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W2000503930
Cited by
395
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 2
FWCI
9.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Nature (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Avian ecology and behavior
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
Keywords
optimal foraging theory, Parus major, patch residence time, foraging behavior, predator-prey interactions, natural selection

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review