Cited by 908

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Gait and the energetics of locomotion in horses

Hoyt, Donald F., Taylor, C. Richard·1981·Nature

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/292239a0

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The preferred walking speeds of horses and elephants are close to their minimum COT speeds.

    “Further, the preferred walking speeds of horses and elephants also are close to their minimum COT speeds (Hoyt and Taylor, 1981;Langman et al., 1995).”

    From Preferred walking speed on rough terrain: is it all about energetics? (2019) · cites this paper as Hoyt and Taylor, 1981

  • Other species, including wildebeest, elephants and horses, exhibit preferred terrestrial locomotion speeds within each gait.

    “It is worth noting that other species, for example wildebeest (Pennycuick, 1975), elephants (Langman et al., 1995) and horses (Hoyt and Taylor, 1981), also exhibit preferred terrestrial locomotion speeds within each gait.”

    From Preferred walking speed on rough terrain: is it all about energetics? (2019) · cites this paper as Hoyt and Taylor, 1981

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Margaria, R. Atti. Acca. naz.Lincei Rc. 6, 7 (1938).
  2. Knuttgen, H. G. Acta physiol. scand. 52, 366–371 (1961). · DOI
  3. Pennycuick, C. J. J. exp. Biol. 63, 775–799 (1975). · DOI · Paper page
  4. Seeherman, H. J., Taylor, C. R., Maloiy, G. M. O. & Armstrong, R. B. Resp. Physiol. (in the press).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Hoyt, D. F., & Taylor, C. R.
Venue
Nature
Published
1981-07
Volume
292
Issue
5820
Pages
239-240
ISSN
  • 0028-0836
  • 1476-4687
Cited by
908
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review