Cited by 70Physiological and biochemical adaptationsRobotic Locomotion and ControlAvian ecology and behavior

Gait-specific energetics contributes to economical walking and running in emus and ostriches

Open access
Watson, Rebecca R., Rubenson, Jonas, Coder, Lisa, Hoyt, Donald F., Propert, Matthew W. G., Marsh, Richard L.·2011·Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences

Abstract

A widely held assumption is that metabolic rate (Ėmet) during legged locomotion is linked to the mechanics of different gaits and this linkage helps explain the preferred speeds of animals in nature. However, despite several prominent exceptions,Ėmet of walking and running vertebrates has been nearly uniformly characterized as increasing linearly with speed across all gaits. This description of locomotor energetics does not predict energetically optimal speeds for minimal cost of transport (Ecot). We tested whether large bipedal ratite birds (emus and ostriches) have gait-specific energetics during walking and running similar to those found in humans. We found that during locomotion, emus showed a curvilinear relationship between Ėmet and speed during walking, and both emus and ostriches demonstrated an abrupt change in the slope of Ėmet versus speed at the gait transition with a linear increase during running. Similar to human locomotion, the minimum net Ecot calculated after subtracting resting metabolism was lower in walking than in running in both species. However, the difference in net Ecot between walking and running was less than is found in humans because of a greater change in the slope of Ėmet versus speed at the gait transition, which lowers the cost of running for the avian bipeds. For emus, we also show that animals moving freely overground avoid a range of speeds surrounding the gait-transition speed within which the Ecot is large. These data suggest that deviations from a linear relation of metabolic rate and speed and variations in transport costs with speed are more widespread than is often assumed, and provide new evidence that locomotor energetics influences the choice of speed in bipedal animals. The low cost of transport for walking is probably ecologically important for emus and ostriches because they spend the majority of their active day walking, and thus the energy used for locomotion is a large part of their daily energy budget.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1098/rspb.2010.2022

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A U-shaped curve during walking locomotion has also been observed in another large cursorial bird, the emu (Dromaius novaehollandiae), and field observations revealed that the self-selected speeds preferred by emu were tightly clustered around the lowest point of the curve in line with predictions they chose this speed to minimize the CoT.

    “A U-shaped curve during walking locomotion has also been observed in another large cursorial bird, the emu (Dromaius novaehollandiae), and field observations revealed that the self-selected speeds preferred by emu were tightly clustered around the lowest point of the curve in line with predictions they chose this speed to minimize the CoT34.”
  • The curvilinear relationship between metabolic power consumption (Pmet) and speed (U) during walking in peacocks is also seen in other animals including some species of large bird, but deviates from the more common linear relationship found in many species.

    “the relationship between metabolic power consumption (Pmet) and speed (U) for walking during both experimental periods was curvilinear, which is also seen in other animals including some species of large bird”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Watson, R. R., Rubenson, J., Coder, L., Hoyt, D. F., Propert, M. W. G., & Marsh, R. L.
Affiliations
  • California State Polytechnic University (US)
  • The University of Western Australia (AU)
  • Northeastern University (US)
Corresponding author
Marsh, Richard L.
Venue
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
Published
2010-12
Volume
278
Issue
1714
Pages
2040-2046
ISSN
  • 0080-4649 (ISSN-L)
  • 0962-8452
  • 1471-2954
OpenAlex
W2123151273
Cited by
70
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UWA Profiles and Research Repository (UWA) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (AR 47337, R01AR047337)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Physiological and biochemical adaptations
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Robotic Locomotion and Control
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Avian ecology and behavior
Keywords
locomotion energetics, cost of transport, metabolic rate, walking, running, gait transition, emu, ostrich, bipedalism, speed choice, overground locomotion
MeSH terms
Animals, California, Energy Metabolism, Female, Gait, Male, Running, Walking, Struthioniformes, Dromaiidae

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review