Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 265

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Tidal disruption of the Magellanic Clouds by the Milky Way

Open access
Putman, M. E., Gibson, B. K., Staveley-Smith, L., Banks, G., Barnes, D. G., Bhatal, R., Disney, M. J., Ekers, R. D., Freeman, K. C., Haynes, R. F., Henning, P., Jerjen, H., Kilborn, V., Koribalski, B., Knezek, P., Malin, D. F., Mould, J. R., Oosterloo, T., Price, R. M., Ryder, S. D., Sadler, E. M., Stewart, I., Stootman, F., Vaile, R. A., Webster, R. L., Wright, A. E.·1998·Nature

Abstract

Interactions between galaxies are common, and influence physical properties such as the global morphology and star-formation rate (Hubble type). Galaxies can interact in many different ways: they can merge together; they can pass through each other, with gas being stripped from the smaller of the two and compressed in the larger; and they can interact gravitationally (including, for example, tides in clusters). The relative importance of these mechanisms is often not clear, as the strength of each depends on poorly known parameters such as the density, extent and nature of the dark-matter haloes that surround galaxies. A nearby example of a galaxy interaction where the mechanism is controversial is that between our Galaxy and two of its neighbours, the Magellanic Clouds. Here we present the results of an atomic-hydrogen survey that help to elucidate this mechanism. Our data reveal a new stream of gas that lies in the opposite direction to the trailing Magellanic Stream and leads the motion of the Clouds. The existence of both leading and trailing streams supports a gravitational interaction whereby the streams are torn from the bodies of the Magellanic Clouds by tidal forces.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/29466

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 265

Metadata

Authors
Putman, M. E., Gibson, B. K., Staveley-Smith, L., Banks, G., Barnes, D. G., Bhatal, R., Disney, M. J., Ekers, R. D., Freeman, K. C., Haynes, R. F., Henning, P., Jerjen, H., Kilborn, V., Koribalski, B., Knezek, P., Malin, D. F., Mould, J. R., Oosterloo, T., Price, R. M., Ryder, S. D., Sadler, E. M., Stewart, I., Stootman, F., Vaile, R. A., Webster, R. L., & Wright, A. E.
Venue
Nature
Published
1998-08
Volume
394
Issue
6695
Pages
752-754
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W1829333143
Cited by
265
References
0
FWCI
12.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Tidal disruption of the Magellanic Clouds by the Milky Way. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/29466
The paper
Putman, M. E., Gibson, B. K., Staveley-Smith, L., Banks, G., Barnes, D. G., Bhatal, R., Disney, M. J., Ekers, R. D., Freeman, K. C., Haynes, R. F., Henning, P., Jerjen, H., Kilborn, V., Koribalski, B., Knezek, P., Malin, D. F., Mould, J. R., Oosterloo, T., Price, R. M., . . . Wright, A. E. (1998). Tidal disruption of the Magellanic Clouds by the Milky Way. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/29466

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.