Cited by 222Paleontology and Stratigraphy of FossilsGeochemistry and Elemental AnalysisGeological and Geochemical Analysis

Sulphate and sulphate reduction in early Precambrian oceans

Cameron, E. M.·1982·Nature

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/296145a0

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Samples studied here are the oldest samples that exhibit low δ34S values in bulk rock analyses.

    “Although minor occurrences of low δ34S pyrite have recently been reported in late Archean strata by in situ analysis (58), samples studied here are the oldest samples that exhibit low δ34S values in bulk rock analyses (18, 59).”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 48 · Cited by 222

Authors
Cameron, E. M.
Affiliations
Geological Survey of Canada (CA)
Corresponding author
Cameron, E. M.
Venue
Nature
Published
1982-03
Volume
296
Issue
5853
Pages
145-148
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W2071835841
Cited by
222
References
48
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 10
FWCI
12.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Nature (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geochemistry and Petrology › Geochemistry and Elemental Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geophysics › Geological and Geochemical Analysis
Keywords
sulfate reduction, sulfur isotopes, sulphate concentration

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review