The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Cell-division sequence motif
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The N-terminus of HPV16 E7 has sequence and functional homology to a portion of CR1 and to the entire CR2 region of adenovirus (Ad) E1a and related sequences in the simian vacuolating virus 40 large tumour antigen (SV40 TAg) [52,53,54]”
From The Not-So-Good, the Bad and the Ugly: HPV E5, E6 and E7 Oncoproteins in the Orchestration of Carcinogenesis (2021) · cites this paper as [53]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 7
- Figge, J., Webster, T., Smith, T.F. & Paucha, E. J. virol. 62, 1814–1818 (1988). · DOI
- Stabel, S., Argos, P. & Philipson, I., EMBO J. 4, 2329–2336 (1985). · DOI
- Phelps, W.C., Lee, C.L., Munger, K. & Howley, P.M. Cell 53, 539–547 (1988). · DOI · Paper page
- DeCaprio, J. et al. Cell (in the press).
- Whyte, P. et al. Nature 334, 124–129 (1988). · DOI · Paper page
- Bister, K., Trachmann, C., Jansen, H.W., Schroeer, B. & Patschinsky, T. Oncogene 1, 97–109 (1987).
- Russel, P. and Nurse, P. Cell 49, 569–576 (1987). · DOI
Cited by
DeCaprio, J. A., Ludlow, J. W., Lynch, D., Furukawa, Y., Griffin, J., Piwnica-Worms, H., Huang, C.-M., & Livingston, D. M. (1989) · Cell · doi:10.1016/0092-8674(89)90507-2 · Cited by 897
Basukala, O., & Banks, L. (2021) · Viruses · doi:10.3390/v13101892 · Cited by 137
Metadata
- Authors
- FIGGE, J., & SMITH, T. F.
- Venue
- Nature
- Published
- 1988-07-14
- Volume
- 334
- Issue
- 6178
- Pages
- 109-109
- ISSN
- 0028-0836
- 1476-4687
- Cited by
- 27
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cell-division sequence motif. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/334109a0
- The paper
- FIGGE, J., & SMITH, T. F. (1988). Cell-division sequence motif. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/334109a0