The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The self-archiving initiative
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“India has four registered archives, with the library at the Indian Institute of Science 16 being the first to set up an eprints archive in India and showing other institutions the way forward.”
From Participation in the global knowledge commons: Challenges and opportunities for research dissemination in developing countries (2005) · cites this paper as [16]
In the citing paper
“India has four registered archives, with the library at the Indian Institute of Science 16 being the first to set up an eprints archive in India and showing other institutions the way forward.”
From Participation in the global knowledge commons: Challenges and opportunities for research dissemination in developing countries (2005) · cites this paper as [16]
Citations
Cites
The Economics of Electronic Journals
Odlyzko, A. M. (1997) · First Monday · doi:10.5210/fm.v2i8.542 · Cited by 178
Scholarly Journals at the Crossroads: A Subversive Proposal for Electronic Publishing
Harnad, S. R. (1995) · ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) · Cited by 105
Self-citationTechnology and scholarly communication
Ekman, R. H., & Quandt, R. E. (1999) · Cited by 56
Scholarly journals at the crossroads: a subversive proposal for electronic publishing
Davis, S. (1996) · Library Acquisitions Practice & Theory · doi:10.1016/0364-6408(96)00012-9 · Cited by 49
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Informetrics at the beginning of the 21st century—A review
Bar‐Ilan, J. (2008) · Journal of Informetrics · doi:10.1016/j.joi.2007.11.001 · Cited by 490
Earlier Web usage statistics as predictors of later citation impact
Brody, T., Harnad, S. R., & Carr, L. A. (2006) · Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.20373 · Cited by 403
Self-citationSmalheiser, N. R., & Torvik, V. I. (2009) · Annual Review of Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/aris.2009.1440430113 · Cited by 254
The Semantic Grid: A Future e‐Science Infrastructure
Roure, D. D., Jennings, N. R., & Shadbolt, N. R. (2003) · Grid Computing · doi:10.1002/0470867167.ch17 · Cited by 227
Chan, L., & Costa, S. (2005) · New Library World · doi:10.1108/03074800510587354 · Cited by 165
“It is for this reason that some advocates of OA, most notably Stevan Harnad ( Harnad 2001; Harnad 2003) (Harnad, Carr et al. 2003), have been championing the other complementary route of OA, namely Open Access Archiving (OAA), as the most immediate road to freeing the entire corpus of the scholarly and scientific lite…”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Harnad, S.
- Affiliations
- University of Southampton (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Harnad, Stevan
- ORCID
- Harnad, Stevan
- Venue
- Nature
- Published
- 2001-04-26
- Volume
- 410
- Issue
- 6832
- Pages
- 1024-1025
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4687
- OpenAlex
- W1669704564
- Cited by
- 153
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 44.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Nature (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- CogPrints (University of Southampton) (submittedVersion)
- ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (submittedVersion)
- DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Academic Publishing and Open Access
- Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Publishing and Scholarly Communication
- Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Library Science and Information
- Keywords
- self-archiving, open access, scholarly publishing
- MeSH terms
- Academies and Institutes, Archives, Authorship, Costs and Cost Analysis, Libraries, Publishing, Research, Peer Review, Research, Internet
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
