The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cancer gene therapy: fringe or cutting edge?
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Vogelstein, B., Lane, D., & Levine, A. J. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35042675 · Cited by 6,607 · cited 1×
“Loss of TP53 increases the rates of spontaneous cancers tremendousl”
Background
Cited by
Progress and problems with the use of viral vectors for gene therapy
Thomas, C. E., Ehrhardt, A., & Kay, M. A. (2003) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg1066 · Cited by 2,501
The RB and p53 pathways in cancer
Sherr, C. J., & McCormick, F. (2002) · Cancer Cell · doi:10.1016/s1535-6108(02)00102-2 · Cited by 1,690
Self-citationTranscription factors as targets for cancer therapy
Darnell, J. E. (2002) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc906 · Cited by 1,194
Apoptosis: a basic biological phenomenon with wide‐ranging implications in human disease
FADEEL, B., & ORRENIUS, S. (2005) · Journal of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2796.2005.01570.x · Cited by 698
Trang, P., Wiggins, J. F., Daige, C. L., Cho, C., Omotola, M., Brown, D., Weidhaas, J. B., Bader, A. G., & Slack, F. J. (2011) · Molecular Therapy · doi:10.1038/mt.2011.48 · Cited by 667
Metadata
- Authors
- McCormick, F.
- Venue
- Nature Reviews Cancer
- Published
- 2001-11-01
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 130-141
- ISSN
- 1474-175X (ISSN-L)
- 1474-1768
- OpenAlex
- W1540542144
- Cited by
- 346
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 2.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cancer gene therapy: fringe or cutting edge? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/35101008
- The paper
- McCormick, F. (2001). Cancer gene therapy: fringe or cutting edge? Nature Reviews Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1038/35101008
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
