The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Conserved left–right asymmetry of nodal expression and alterations in murine situs inversus
Open accessAbstract
VERTEBRATES have characteristic and conserved left–right (L–R) visceral asymmetries, for example the left-sided heart. In humans, alterations of L–R development can have serious clinical implications, including cardiac defects1. Although little is known about how the embryonic L–R axis is established, a recent study in the chick embryo revealed L–R asymmetric expression of several previously cloned genes, including Cnr-1 (for chicken nodal-related-1), and indicated how this L–R molecular asymmetry might be important for subsequent visceral morphogenesis2. Here we show that nodal3 is asymmetrically expressed in mice at similar stages, as is Xnr-1 (for Xenopus nodal related-1)4 in frogs. We also examine nodal expression in two mouse mutations that perturb L–R development, namely situs inversus viscerum (iv)5, in which assignment of L–R asymmetry is apparently random and individuals develop either normally or are mirror-image-reversed (situs inversus), and inversion of embryonic turning (inv)6, in which all individuals develop with situs inversus. In both, nodal expression is strikingly affected, being reversed or converted to symmetry. These results further support a key role for nodal and nodal-related genes in interpreting and relaying L–R patterning information in vertebrates. To our knowledge, our results provide the first direct evidence that iv and inv normally function well before the appearance of morphological L–R asymmetry.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Mutation of an axonemal dynein affects left–right asymmetry in inversus viscerum mice
Supp, D. M., Witte, D. P., Potter, S. S., & Brueckner, M. (1997) · Nature · doi:10.1038/40140 · Cited by 554
Self-citationEstablishment of vertebrate left–right asymmetry
Hamada, H., Meno, C., Watanabe, D., & Saijoh, Y. (2002) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg732 · Cited by 489
Meno, C., Gritsman, K., Ohishi, S., Ohfuji, Y., Heckscher, E., Mochida, K., Shimono, A., Kondoh, H., Talbot, W. S., Robertson, E. J., et al. (1999) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/s1097-2765(00)80331-7 · Cited by 374
Cerebellum, Language, and Cognition in Autism and Specific Language Impairment
Hodge, S. M., Makris, N., Kennedy, D. N., Caviness, V. S., Howard, J., McGrath, L., Steele, S., Frazier, J. A., Tager-Flusberg, H., & Harris, G. J. (2010) · Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders · doi:10.1007/s10803-009-0872-7 · Cited by 143
Evolutionary Proteomics Uncovers Ancient Associations of Cilia with Signaling Pathways
Sigg, M. A., Menchen, T., Lee, C., Johnson, J., Jungnickel, M. K., Choksi, S. P., Garcia, G., Busengdal, H., Dougherty, G. W., Pennekamp, P., et al. (2017) · Developmental Cell · doi:10.1016/j.devcel.2017.11.014 · Cited by 130
Metadata
- Authors
- Lowe, L. A., Supp, D. M., Sampath, K., Yokoyama, T., Wright, C. V. E., Potter, S. S., Overbeek, P., & Kuehn, M. R.
- Venue
- Nature
- Published
- 1996-05
- Volume
- 381
- Issue
- 6578
- Pages
- 158-161
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4687
- OpenAlex
- W2077557886
- Cited by
- 461
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 14.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Conserved left–right asymmetry of nodal expression and alterations in murine situs inversus. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/381158a0
- The paper
- Lowe, L. A., Supp, D. M., Sampath, K., Yokoyama, T., Wright, C. V. E., Potter, S. S., Overbeek, P., & Kuehn, M. R. (1996). Conserved left–right asymmetry of nodal expression and alterations in murine situs inversus. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/381158a0
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.