Correlation between male song repertoire, extra-pair paternity and offspring survival in the great reed warbler

Hasselquist, Dennis, Bensch, Staffan, von Schantz, Torbjörn·1996·Nature

DOI 10.1038/381229a0

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/381229a0

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Why ritualized behavior? Precaution Systems and action parsing in developmental, pathological and cultural rituals
Boyer, P., & Liénard, P. (2006) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x06009332 · Cited by 601
Brain development, song learning and mate choice in birds: a review and experimental test of the "nutritional stress hypothesis"
S., N., W., S., & S., P. (2002) · Journal of Comparative Physiology A: Sensory, Neural, and Behavioral Physiology · doi:10.1007/s00359-002-0361-3 · Cited by 481
Acoustic sequences in non‐human animals: a tutorial review and prospectus
Kershenbaum, A., Blumstein, D. T., Roch, M. A., Akçay, Ç., Backus, G., Bee, M. A., Bohn, K., Cao, Y., Carter, G., Cäsar, C., et al. (2016) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1111/brv.12160 · Cited by 337
Song Function and the Evolution of Female Preferences: Why Birds Sing, Why Brains Matter
NOWICKI, S., & SEARCY, W. A. (2004) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1196/annals.1298.012 · Cited by 230
Song complexity correlates with learning ability in zebra finch males
Boogert, N. J., Giraldeau, L.-A., & Lefebvre, L. (2008) · Animal Behaviour · doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2008.08.009 · Cited by 201
Precaution systems and ritualized behavior
Boyer, P., & Linard, P. (2006) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x06009575 · Cited by 76
Manipulation of olfactory signaling and mate choice for conservation breeding: A case study of harvest mice
ROBERTS, S. C., & GOSLING, L. M. (2004) · Conservation Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2004.00514.x · Cited by 58
When to Cheat: Modeling Dynamics of Paternity and Promiscuity in Socially Monogamous Prairie Voles (Microtus ochrogaster)
Rice, M. A., Restrepo, L. F., & Ophir, A. G. (2018) · Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.3389/fevo.2018.00141 · Cited by 13

Authors: Hasselquist, D., Bensch, S., & von Schantz, T.
Venue: Nature
Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published: 1996-05
Volume: 381
Issue: 6579
Pages: 229-232
ISSN: 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
1476-4687
DOI: 10.1038/381229a0
OpenAlex: W1972115120
Cited by: 675
References: 0
FWCI: 59.79
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review