Cited by 82Visual perception and processing mechanismsTactile and Sensory InteractionsSpatial Neglect and Hemispheric Dysfunction

Blindsight in normal subjects?

Morgan, M. J., Mason, A. J. S., Solomon, J. A.·1997·Nature

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/385401b0

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The Kolb and Braun finding has proven difficult to replicate.

    “Although this finding has proven difficult to replicate (Morgan and Mason, 1997)”

    From How to measure metacognition (2014) · cites this paper as Morgan and Mason, 1997

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Morgan, M. J., Mason, A. J. S., & Solomon, J. A.
Affiliations
University College London (GB)
Venue
Nature
Published
1997-01
Volume
385
Issue
6615
Pages
401-402
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W2053495330
Cited by
82
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 4
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Spatial Neglect and Hemispheric Dysfunction
Keywords
blindsight, normal subjects, visual perception, individual differences
MeSH terms
Humans, Time Factors, Visual Cortex, Visual Perception, Contrast Sensitivity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review