Cited by 1,260Neurobiology of Language and BilingualismNeuroscience and Music PerceptionPhonetics and Phonology Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 22 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Language-specific phoneme representations revealed by electric and magnetic brain responses

Abstract

There is considerable debate about whether the early processing of sounds depends on whether they form part of speech. Proponents of such speech specificity postulate the existence of language-dependent memory traces, which are activated in the processing of speech but not when equally complex, acoustic non-speech stimuli are processed. Here we report the existence of these traces in the human brain. We presented to Finnish subjects the Finnish phoneme prototype /e/ as the frequent stimulus, and other Finnish phoneme prototypes or a non-prototype (the Estonian prototype /õ/) as the infrequent stimulus. We found that the brain's automatic change-detection response, reflected electrically as the mismatch negativity (MMN), was enhanced when the infrequent, deviant stimulus was a prototype (the Finnish /ö/) relative to when it was a non-prototype (the Estonian /õ/). These phonemic traces, revealed by MMN, are language-specific, as /õ/ caused enhancement of MMN in Estonians. Whole-head magnetic recordings located the source of this native-language, phoneme-related response enhancement, and thus the language-specific memory traces, in the auditory cortex of the left hemisphere.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/385432a0

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 22 references

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Aaltonen, O., Eerola, O., Hellström, Å., Unispaikka, E., & Lang, A. H. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (in the press).
  2. Wiik, K. Ann. Univ. Turku. 94, 1–192 (1965).
  3. Liiv, G. & Remmel, M. Sov. Fenno-Ugric Studies VI 1, 7–23 (1970).
  4. Näätänen, R. & Alho, K. Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol. (suppl.) 44, 179–185 (1995).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 401–500 of 1,000

Metadata

Authors
Näätänen, R., Lehtokoski, A., Lennes, M., Cheour, M., Huotilainen, M., Iivonen, A., Vainio, M., Alku, P., Ilmoniemi, R. J., Luuk, A., Allik, J., Sinkkonen, J., & Alho, K.
Affiliations
  • University of Helsinki (FI)
  • University of Turku (FI)
  • Helsinki University Hospital (FI)
  • University of Tartu (EE)
Venue
Nature
Published
1997-01
Volume
385
Issue
6615
Pages
432-434
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W2089239460
Cited by
1,260
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 60 · 2021: 36 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 42 · 2018: 31 · 2017: 46 · 2016: 46 · 2015: 38 · 2014: 50 · 2013: 50 · 2012: 55
FWCI
18.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Music Perception
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Phonetics and Phonology Research
Keywords
phonemic representation, mismatch negativity, auditory cortex, change detection, cross-linguistic comparison, left hemisphere, auditory event-related potentials, magnetoencephalography
MeSH terms
Acoustic Stimulation, Adult, Brain, Estonia, Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Female, Finland, Humans, Language, Magnetics, Male, Phonetics, Speech Perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review