Cited by 36Neurobiology of Language and BilingualismPhonetics and Phonology ResearchNeuroscience and Music Perception

Domain general change detection accounts for “dishabituation” effects in temporal–parietal regions in functional magnetic resonance imaging studies of speech perception

Open access
Zevin, Jason D., Yang, Jianfeng, Skipper, Jeremy I., McCandliss, Bruce D.·2010·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies of speech sound categorization often compare conditions in which a stimulus is presented repeatedly to conditions in which multiple stimuli are presented. This approach has established that a set of superior temporal and inferior parietal regions respond more strongly to conditions containing stimulus change. Here, we examine whether this contrast is driven by habituation to a repeating condition or by selective responding to change. Experiment 1 directly tests this by comparing the observed response to long trains of stimuli against a constructed hemodynamic response modeling the hypothesis that no habituation occurs. The results are consistent with the view that enhanced response to conditions involving phonemic variability reflect change detection. In a second experiment, the specificity of these responses to linguistically relevant stimulus variability was studied by including a condition in which the talker, rather than phonemic category, was variable from stimulus to stimulus. In this context, strong change detection responses were observed to changes in talker, but not to changes in phoneme category. The results prompt a reconsideration of two assumptions common to fMRI studies of speech sound categorization: they suggest that temporoparietal responses in passive paradigms such as those used here are better characterized as reflecting change detection than habituation, and that their apparent selectivity to speech sound categories may reflect a more general preference for variability in highly salient or behaviorally relevant stimulus dimensions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.4599-09.2010

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There is less support for the prior association of the left ventral anterior supramarginal gyrus with a phonological store because fronto-parietal verbal short-term memory areas are also activated for unexpected auditory change during tasks with minimal working memory demands.

    “Less support was provided for the prior association of the left ventral anterior supramarginal gyrus with a phonological store because the fronto-parietal verbal short-term memory areas are also activated for unexpected auditory change during tasks that have minimal working memory demands (Myers et al., 2009; Zevin et al., 2010; Ravizza et al., 2011).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Joanisse MF Zevin JD McCandliss BD Dishabituation of the BOLD response to within-and between-category acoustic change Cereb Cortex 2007 17 2084 2093 17138597

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zevin, J. D., Yang, J., Skipper, J. I., & McCandliss, B. D.
Affiliations
  • Weill Cornell Medicine (US)
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
  • Vanderbilt University (US)
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2010-01-20
Volume
30
Issue
3
Pages
1110-1117
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W1985488007
Cited by
36
References
44
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 7
FWCI
3.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Institutional Repository of Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences (Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences) (submittedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • James S. McDonnell Foundation
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (R01DC007694, R21-DC0008969, R21DC008969)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Phonetics and Phonology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Music Perception
Keywords
speech sound categorization, change detection, dishabituation, habituation, superior temporal cortex, inferior parietal cortex, speaker variability, domain-general processing, temporal-parietal cortex
MeSH terms
Acoustic Stimulation, Brain Mapping, Female, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Inhibition, Psychological, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Oxygen, Parietal Lobe, Phonetics, Psycholinguistics, Speech Perception, Statistics as Topic, Temporal Lobe, Time Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review