Cited by 1,475Carbon Nanotubes in CompositesGraphene research and applicationsForce Microscopy Techniques and Applications

Bending and buckling of carbon nanotubes under large strain

Falvo, M. R., Clary, G. J., Taylor, R. M., Chi, V., Brooks, F. P., Washburn, S., Superfine, R.·1997·Nature

Abstract

The curling of a graphitic sheet to form carbon nanotubes produces a class of materials that seem to have extraordinary electrical and mechanical properties. In particular, the high elastic modulus of the graphite sheets means that the nanotubes might be stiffer and stronger than any other known material, with beneficial consequences for their application in composite bulk materials and as individual elements of nanometre-scale devices and sensors. The mechanical properties are predicted to be sensitive to details of their structure and to the presence of defects, which means that measurements on individual nanotubes are essential to establish these properties. Here we show that multiwalled carbon nanotubes can be bent repeatedly through large angles using the tip of an atomic force microscope, without undergoing catastrophic failure. We observe a range of responses to this high-strain deformation, which together suggest that nanotubes are remarkably flexible and resilient.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/39282

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Electroactive polymer (EAP) actuators are attractive mainly because of their large-strain discontinuous actuations driven by electrical field or current, easy control and low cost.

    “The electroactive polymer (EAP) actuators, as new technological devices, are attractive mainly because of their large-strain discontinuous actuations driven by electrical field or current, easily control and low cost [124].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Falvo, M. R., Clary, G. J., Taylor, R. M., Chi, V., Brooks, F. P., Washburn, S., & Superfine, R.
Affiliations
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Corresponding author
Superfine, R.
Venue
Nature
Published
1997-10
Volume
389
Issue
6651
Pages
582-584
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W1982519899
Cited by
1,475
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 31 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 49 · 2017: 56 · 2016: 58 · 2015: 48 · 2014: 68 · 2013: 76 · 2012: 58
FWCI
34.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Carbon Nanotubes in Composites
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Graphene research and applications
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications
Keywords
carbon nanotubes, multi-walled carbon nanotubes, bending, buckling, large strain deformation, resilience engineering, mechanical properties, nanotube defects
MeSH terms
Carbon, Elasticity, Graphite, Microscopy, Atomic Force

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review