The cultural wealth of nations
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The human cultural adaptive radiation is comparable in scope to genetic adaptive radiations of major taxonomic groups such as mammals and dinosaurs.
“The human cultural adaptive radiation is comparable in scope to the genetic adaptive radiations of major taxonomic groups such as mammals and dinosaurs (Pagel & Mace 2004).”
From Evolving the future: Toward a science of intentional change (2014) · cites this paper as Pagel & Mace 2004
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 35 · Cited by 217
- Authors
- Pagel, M., & Mace, R.
- Affiliations
- University of Reading (GB)
- University College London (GB)
- Venue
- Nature
- Published
- 2004-03
- Volume
- 428
- Issue
- 6980
- Pages
- 275-278
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4687
- OpenAlex
- W2039765955
- Cited by
- 217
- References
- 35
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 44 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 282.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Nature (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Language and cultural evolution
- Social Sciences › Demography › Culture, Economy, and Development Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
- Keywords
- cultural diversity, cultural evolution, human genetic variation, cultural differences, cultural continuity
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Environment, Geography, Humans, Language, Phylogeny, Social Behavior, Genetic Variation, Cultural Diversity, Racial Groups
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review