Transparent frogs show potential of natural world
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Transparent tetrapod models are basically unpigmented mutants that are not transparent.
“Furthermore, transparent tetrapod models are basically unpigmented mutants that are not transparent [e.g., (30–32)].”
From Glassfrogs conceal blood in their liver to maintain transparency (2022) · cites this paper as [32]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Glassfrogs conceal blood in their liver to maintain transparency
Taboada, C., Delia, J., Chen, M., Ma, C., Peng, X., Zhu, X., Jiang, L., Vu, T., Zhou, Q., Yao, J., et al. (2022) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.abl6620 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
- Authors
- Castroviejo-Fisher, S., De la Riva, I., & Vilà, C.
- Affiliations
- Uppsala University (SE)
- ORCID
- Vilà, Carles
- Venue
- Nature
- Published
- 2007-10-24
- Volume
- 449
- Issue
- 7165
- Pages
- 972-972
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4687
- OpenAlex
- W2083311704
- Cited by
- 5
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2022: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 0.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Nature (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- DIGITAL.CSIC (Spanish National Research Council (CSIC)) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Amphibian and Reptile Biology
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Comparative Animal Anatomy Studies
- Keywords
- skin transparency, amphibian skin pigmentation, natural variation
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Anura, Ranidae, Biomedical Research
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
