Cited by 112Mental Health and Patient InvolvementEthics in Clinical ResearchHealth and Medical Research Impacts

Democratizing clinical research

Lloyd, Keith, White, Jo·2011·Nature

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/474277a

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Processes that draw on the 'practical wisdom' of nonscientists have the potential to make scientific discoveries more thoroughly relevant to communities, more directly tailored to the realities of their everyday lives and more consistent with their values.

    “Processes that draw on the ‘practical wisdom’ of nonscientists have the potential to make scientific discoveries more thoroughly relevant to communities, more directly tailored to the realities of their everyday lives and more consistent with their values (Chalmers, 2004; Hickey, 2018; Lloyd & White, 2011; Pellicano, 2020).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lloyd, K., & White, J.
Affiliations
Swansea University (GB)
Corresponding author
Lloyd, Keith
Venue
Nature
Published
2011-06-15
Volume
474
Issue
7351
Pages
277-278
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W2032975517
Cited by
112
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 11
FWCI
16.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mental Health and Patient Involvement
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics in Clinical Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Health and Medical Research Impacts
Keywords
patient involvement, clinician engagement, research priorities, shared decision-making, public engagement in research
MeSH terms
Democracy, Depression, Humans, Patient Advocacy, Schizophrenia, Uncertainty, Biomedical Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review