Announcement: Reducing our irreproducibility

·2013·Nature
DOI 10.1038/496398a

Cited by (243)

Items 101–200 of 243

  1. Open Science and Reporting Animal Studies: Who's Accountable?
    Jonathan A. Eisen, Emma Ganley, Catriona MacCallum · 2014 · PLoS Biology
  2. Improving the reliability of peer-reviewed publications: We are all in it together
    Bustin, Stephen A., Nolan, Tania · 2016 · Biomolecular Detection and Quantification
  3. Are neuromuscular blocking agents being misused in laboratory pigs?
    A. G. Bradbury, Richard Eddie Clutton · 2016 · British Journal of Anaesthesia
  4. Reproducibility Issues: Avoiding Pitfalls in Animal Inflammation Models
    Jon D. Laman, Susanne M. Kooistra, Björn E. Clausen · 2017 · Methods in molecular biology
  5. Reliable Surface Analysis Data of Nanomaterials in Support of Risk Assessment Based on Minimum Information Requirements
    Jörg Radnik, Reinhard Kersting, Birgit Hagenhoff, Francesca Bennet, Dmitri Ciornii, Penny E. H. Nymark, Roland Grafström, Vasile‐Dan Hodoroaba · 2021 · Nanomaterials
  6. Journal Initiatives to Enhance Preclinical Research: Analyses of Stroke, Nature Medicine, Science Translational Medicine
    Francisco Daniel Ramirez, Richard G. Jung, Pouya Motazedian, Dylan Perry‐Nguyen, Pietro Di Santo, Zachary MacDonald, Aisling A. Clancy, Alisha Labinaz, Steven Promislow, Trevor Simard et al. · 2019 · Stroke
  7. Ethics in Science
    Om P. Sharma · 2015 · Indian Journal of Microbiology
  8. Enhancing reproducibility using interprofessional team best practices
    Betsy Rolland, Elizabeth S. Burnside, Corrine I. Voils, Manish N. Shah, Allan R. Brasier · 2020 · Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
  9. Using Bayesian analysis in repeated preclinical in vivo studies for a more effective use of animals
    Rosalind J. Walley, John Sherington, Joe Rastrick, Eric Detrait, Étienne Hanon, Gillian Watt · 2016 · Pharmaceutical Statistics
  10. Is the Political Slant of Psychology Research Related to Scientific Replicability?
    Diego A. Reinero, Julian Augustus Wills, William J. Brady, Peter Mende‐Siedlecki, Jarret T. Crawford, Jay Joseph Van Bavel · 2020 · Perspectives on Psychological Science
  11. Does GLP enhance the quality of toxicological evidence for regulatory decisions?: TABLE 1.
    Christopher J. Borgert, Richard A. Becker, Betsy D. Carlton, Mark L. Hanson, Pat Kwiatkowski, Mary Sue Marty, Lynn S. McCarty, Terry F. Quill, Keith R. Solomon, Glen Van Der Kraak et al. · 2016 · Toxicological Sciences
  12. Supporting evidence-based analysis for modified risk tobacco products through a toxicology data-sharing infrastructure
    Stéphanie Boué, Thomas E. Exner, Samik Ghosh, Vincenzo Belcastro, Joh Dokler, David I. Page, Akash R. Boda, Filipe Bonjour, Barry J. Hardy, Patrick Vanscheeuwijck et al. · 2017 · F1000Research
  13. The changing roles of scientific journals
    Arturo Casadevall, Lorraine F. Clark, Ferric C. Fang · 2024 · mBio
  14. Beyond protein expression, MOPED goes multi-omics
    Elizabeth Montague, Imre Janko, Larissa I Stanberry, Elaine Yuen Phin Lee, John Choiniere, Nathaniel Anderson, Elizabeth Stewart, William Broomall, Roger Higdon, Natali Kolker et al. · 2014 · Nucleic Acids Research
  15. Open Transparent Communication about Animals in Laboratories: Dialog for Multiple Voices and Multiple Audiences
    Larry Carbone · 2021 · Animals
  16. Quality control of purified proteins to improve data quality and reproducibility: results from a large-scale survey
    Nicholas Simon Berrow, Ario de Marco, Mario Lebendiker, María García-Alai, Stefan H. Knauer, Blanca Lopez Mendez, André Matagne, Annabel H. A. Parret, Kim Remans, Stephan F. W. Uebel et al. · 2021 · European Biophysics Journal
  17. Reproducibility of biomedical research – The importance of editorial vigilance
    Stephen Andrew Bustin, Jim F. Huggett · 2017 · Biomolecular Detection and Quantification
  18. A call for action: Improve reporting of research studies to increase the scientific basis for regulatory decision‐making
    Marlene Ågerstrand, Sofie Christiansen, Annika Hanberg, Christina Rudén, Lars Andersson, Sjur Andersen, Henrik Appelgren, Christine Bjørge, Ian Henning Clausen, Dag M. Eide et al. · 2018 · Journal of Applied Toxicology
  19. Extracellular recordings reveal absence of magneto sensitive units in the avian optic tectum
    Edgardo Ramírez, Gonzalo J. Marin, Jorge Mpodozis, Juan‐Carlos Letelier · 2014 · Journal of Comparative Physiology A
  20. Replacing bar graphs of continuous data with more informative graphics: are we making progress?
    Nico Riedel, Robert Schulz, Vartan Kazezian, Tracey Lynn Weissgerber · 2022 · Clinical Science
  21. Knowledge and Attitudes Among Life Scientists Toward Reproducibility Within Journal Articles: A Research Survey
    Evanthia Kaimaklioti Samota, Robert Davey · 2021 · Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics
  22. Understanding of researcher behavior is required to improve data reliability
    Mark N. Wass, Larry Ray, Martin Michaelis · 2019 · GigaScience
  23. Democratizing an electroluminescence imaging apparatus and analytics project for widespread data acquisition in photovoltaic materials
    Justin S. Fada, Nicholas R. Wheeler, Davis Zabiyaka, Nikhil Goel, Timothy J. Peshek, Roger H. French · 2016 · Review of Scientific Instruments
  24. Silicon Valley meets the ivory tower: Searchable data repositories for experimental nanomaterials research
    Nils E. Persson, Michael McBride, Martha A. Grover, Elsa Reichmanis · 2016 · Current Opinion in Solid State and Materials Science
  25. Water pricing and the value-add of irrigation water in Vietnam: Insights from a crop choice model fitted to a national household survey
    Long Chu, R. Quentin Grafton · 2019 · Agricultural Water Management
  26. Biobanking on Multiple Continents: Will International Coordination Follow?
    Jim Vaught, Marianna J. Bledsoe, Peter Hamilton Watson · 2014 · Biopreservation and Biobanking
  27. Reproducibility and replicability of rodent phenotyping in preclinical studies
    Neri Kafkafi, Joseph Agassi, Elissa J. Chesler, John C. Crabbe, Wim E. Crusio, David Eilam, Robert T. Gerlai, Ilan Golani, Àlex Gómez-Marín, Ruth Heller et al. · 2016 · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  28. Estimating Information Processing in a Memory System: The Utility of Meta-analytic Methods for Genetics
    Tugce Yildizoglu, Jan-Marek Weislogel, Farhan Mohammad, Edwin Shih-Yen Chan, Pryseley Nkouibert Assam, Adam Claridge‐Chang · 2015 · PLoS Genetics
  29. Transparency of Reporting in Molecular Diagnostics
    Stephen Andrew Bustin · 2013 · International Journal of Molecular Sciences
  30. Biospecimen Data Reporting in the Research Literature
    Anna Meredith, Daniel Simeon‐Dubach, Lise Anne Marie Matzke, Stefanie Cheah, Peter Hamilton Watson · 2019 · Biopreservation and Biobanking
  31. Current Instrumentation and Technologies in Modern Radiobiology Research—Opportunities and Challenges
    Eric Ford, Jim A. Deye · 2016 · Seminars in Radiation Oncology
  32. Psychological science’s replicability crisis and what it means for science in the courtroom
    Jason Michael Chin · 2017
  33. Transparent reporting of research results in eLife
    M. Dawn Teare · 2016 · eLife
  34. Joining the reproducibility initiative
    2014 · Nature Nanotechnology
  35. Single-molecule dataset (SMD): a generalized storage format for raw and processed single-molecule data
    Max Greenfeld, Jan-Willem van de Meent, Dmitri S. Pavlichin, Hideo Mabuchi, Chris H. Wiggins, Ruben L. Gonzalez, Daniel Herschlag · 2015 · BMC Bioinformatics
  36. Methodological differences account for inconsistencies in reported free VEGF concentrations in pregnant rats
    Tracey Lynn Weissgerber, Andrea L. McConico, Bruce E. Knudsen, Kim A. Butters, Suzanne R. Hayman, Wendy White, Natasa M Milic, Virginia M. Miller, Vesna D. Garovic · 2014 · American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology
  37. Raising the Bar for Reproducible Science at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Research and Development
    Barbara Jane George, Jon R. Sobus, Lara P. Phelps, Brenda Rashleigh, Jane Ellen Simmons, Ronald N. Hines, the Community of Practice for Statistics Guidance Documents Working Groups · 2015 · Toxicological Sciences
  38. The rise of information science: a changing landscape for soil science
    Pierre Roudier, Alistair Ritchie, C. L. Hedley, David Medyckyj-Scott · 2015 · IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science
  39. Statistical Rigor and the Perils of Chance
    Katherine Susan Button · 2016 · eNeuro
  40. In praise of open research measures
    Eugene Kolker · 2013 · Nature
  41. Cross‐disciplinary data practices in earth system science: Aligning services with reuse and reproducibility priorities
    An Yan, Caihong Huang, Jian‐Sin Lee, Carole L. Palmer · 2020 · Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology
  42. Randomization, blinding, data handling and sample size estimation in papers published in Veterinary Anaesthesia and Analgesia in 2009 and 2019
    Brittany A Munro, Paige Bergen, Daniel Pang · 2021 · Veterinary Anaesthesia and Analgesia
  43. Assessing the reproducibility of discriminant function analyses
    Rose L. Andrew, Arianne Albert, Sébastien Renaut, Diana J. Rennison, Dan G. Bock, Tim Vines · 2015 · PeerJ
  44. Annual post‐market environmental monitoring report on the cultivation of genetically modified maize MON 810 in 2016
    European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), Fernando Álvarez, Yann Devos, Marios Georgiadis, Antoine Messéan, Elisabeth Waigmann · 2018 · EFSA Journal
  45. Bedside to bench: a look at experimental research with a clinical trial checklist
    K. Sipido, B. Casadei, P. Holvoet, S. Janssens, A. Luttun, M. Sampaolesi · 2014 · Cardiovascular Research
  46. BIO Comes Into the Cold to Adopt BRISQ
    Daniel Simeon‐Dubach, Helen M. Moore · 2014 · Biopreservation and Biobanking
  47. A call to action to address critical flaws and bias in laboratory animal experiments and preclinical research
    Hugh G.G. Townsend, Klaus Osterrieder, Murray D. Jelinski, Douglas Walter Morck, Cheryl Waldner, William R. Cox, Volker Gerdts, Andrew A. Potter, Lorne A. Babiuk, James C. Cross · 2025 · Scientific Reports
  48. Misidentified biomedical resources: Journal guidelines are not a quick fix
    Wytske M. Hepkema, Serge P. J. M. Horbach, Joyce M. Hoek, Willem Halffman · 2021 · International Journal of Cancer
  49. A Preclinical Physiological Assay to Test Modulation of Knee Joint Pain in the Spinal Cord: Effects of Oxycodone and Naproxen
    Jason A. Miranda, Phil Stanley, Katrina Gore, Jamie Turner, Rebecca Dias, Huw Rees · 2014 · PLoS ONE
  50. New forms of checks and balances are needed to improve research integrity
    Elizabeth J. Iorns, Christin Chong · 2014 · F1000Research
  51. ProtocolNavigator: emulation-based software for the design, documentation and reproduction biological experiments
    Imtiaz Khan, Adam N. Fraser, Mark‐Anthony Bray, Paul J. Smith, Nick S. White, Anne Elizabeth Carpenter, Rachel J. Errington · 2014 · Bioinformatics
  52. Minimum Information in In Vivo Research
    Patrizia Voehringer, Janet R. Nicholson · 2019 · Handbook of experimental pharmacology
  53. The erosion of research integrity: the need for culture change
    Lee M. Ellis · 2015 · The Lancet Oncology
  54. Science Between Trust and Control: Non-Reproducibility in Scholarly Publishing
    Martina Franzen · 2016 · John Wiley & Sons, Inc. eBooks
  55. Flatbed epi relief-contrast cellular monitoring system for stable cell culture
    Tatsuya Osaki, Tatsuto Kageyama, Yuka Shimazu, Dina Mysnikova, Shintaro Takahashi, Shinichi Takimoto, Junji Fukuda · 2017 · Scientific Reports
  56. Acetaldehyde sequestration by d-penicillamine prevents ethanol relapse-like drinking in rats: evidence from an operant self-administration paradigm
    Lucía Martí‐Prats, Teodoro Zornoza, José Antonio López‐Moreno, Luis M. Granero, Ana Polache · 2015 · Psychopharmacology
  57. Shortcut citations in the methods section: Frequency, problems, and strategies for responsible reuse
    Kai Standvoss, Vartan Kazezian, Britta R. Lewke, Kathleen Bastian, Shambhavi Chidambaram, Subhi Arafat, Ubai Alsharif, Ana Lucía Herrera-Meléndez, Anna‐Delia Knipper, Bruna M. S. Seco et al. · 2024 · PLoS Biology
  58. Research Wranglers: Initiatives to Improve Reproducibility of Study Findings
    Charles W. Schmidt · 2014 · Environmental Health Perspectives
  59. Lesson of 15-year exposure to Bisphenol A: a critical discussion of biomonitoring studies
    Wolfgang Völkel · 2017 · Archives of Toxicology
  60. Gene set bagging for estimating the probability a statistically significant result will replicate
    Andrew E. Jaffe, John D. Storey, Hongkai Ji, Jeffrey T. Leek · 2013 · BMC Bioinformatics
  61. Social Information use by Barnacle GeeseBranta leucopsis, an Experiment Revisited
    Ralf H. J. M. Kurvers, Kees Straates, Ronald C. Ydenberg, Sipke E. van Wieren, Piet S. Swierstra, Herbert H. T. Prins · 2014 · Ardea
  62. MIBLood-EV: An Online Reporting Tool to Facilitate the Standardized Reporting of Preanalytical Variables and Quality Control of Plasma and Serum to Enhance Rigor and Reproducibility in Liquid Biopsy Research
    Dakota Gustafson, Rienk Nieuwland, Fabrice Lucien · 2024 · Biopreservation and Biobanking
  63. A survey of researchers’ methods sharing practices and priorities
    Marcel LaFlamme, James Harney, Iain Hrynaszkiewicz · 2024 · PeerJ
  64. Drug Target Identification and Validation: Global Pharmaceutical Industry Experts on Challenges, Best Strategies, Innovative Precompetitive Collaboration Concepts, and Future Areas of Industry Precompetitive Research and Development
    Tobias Bergauer, Thorsten Ruppert, Laurent Essioux, Olivia Spleiss · 2016 · Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science
  65. The Importance of Reproducibility in Plastic Surgery Research
    Mona Ascha, Mustafa Steven Ascha, James R. Gatherwright · 2019 · Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery
  66. Taking shortcuts: Great for travel, but not for reproducible methods sections
    Kai Standvoss, Vartan Kazezian, Britta R. Lewke, Kathleen Bastian, Shambhavi Chidambaram, Subhi Arafat, Ubai Alsharif, Ana Lucía Herrera-Meléndez, Anna‐Delia Knipper, Bruna M. S. Seco et al. · 2022 · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  67. OMICS Studies: How about Metadata Checklist and Data Publications?
    Eugene Kolker, Elizabeth Stewart · 2014 · Journal of Proteome Research
  68. Toward a FAIR Reproducible Research
    Christophe Bontemps, Valérie Orozco · 2021 · Springer eBooks
  69. Scientific Data : An open access and open data publication to facilitate reproducible research
    Iain Hrynaszkiewicz, Yoko SHINTANI · 2014 · Journal of Information Processing and Management
  70. Handling the fragile vase of scientific practices
    John P. A. Ioannidis · 2014 · Addiction
  71. Ethical and efficient research management: A new challenge for an old problem
    E Giesen-Crouse · 2015 · International Journal of Metrology and Quality Engineering
  72. The effect of journal guidelines on the reporting of antibody validation
    Joyce M. Hoek, Wytske M. Hepkema, Willem Halffman · 2020 · PeerJ
  73. Science joins push to screen statistics in papers
    Richard Van Noorden · 2014 · Nature
  74. Information Retrieval and Survey Design for Two-Stage Customer Preference Modeling
    Y. Xiao, Yaxin Cui, Nikita Raut, Jonathan Januar, Johan H. Koskinen, Noshir Contractor, W. Chen, Zhenghui Sha · 2022 · Proceedings of the Design Society
  75. Quality of reporting of prospective in vivo and ex vivo studies published in the Journal of Veterinary Emergency and Critical Care over a 10‐year period (2009–2019)
    Paige Bergen, Brittany A Munro, Daniel Pang · 2023 · Journal of Veterinary Emergency and Critical Care
  76. Helping to drive the robustness of preclinical research – the assay capability tool
    Katrina Gore, Phil Stanley · 2015 · Pharmacology Research & Perspectives
  77. Teaching examples for the design of experiments: geographical sensitivity and the self‐fulfilling prophecy
    Dennis William Lendrem, Clare Lendrem, Ruth C. Rowland‐Jones, Fabio D'Agostino, Matt Linsley, Martin R. Owen, John Dudley Isaacs · 2015 · Pharmaceutical Statistics
  78. Toward More Transparent and Reproducible Omics Studies Through a Common Metadata Checklist and Data Publications
    Eugene Kolker, Vural Özdemir, Lennart Martens, William S. Hancock, Gordon Anderson, Nathaniel Anderson, Şükrü Aynacıoğlu, Ancha V. Baranova, Shawn Robert Campagna, Rui Chen et al. · 2013 · Big Data
  79. A new quality management perspective for biodiversity conservation and research: Investigating B iospecimen R eporting for I mproved S tudy Q uality (BRISQ) and the S tandard PRE -analytical C ode (SPREC) using Natural History Museum and culture collections as case studies
    Erica E. Benson, Keith Harding, Jacqueline A. Mackenzie‐Dodds · 2016 · Systematics and Biodiversity
  80. Delsa Workshop IV: Launching the Quantified Human Initiative
    Elizabeth Stewart, Todd Smith, Andrea G. De Souza, Jack Faris, Lennart Martens, Sophie Mohin, Vural Özdemir, Courtney MacNealy-Koch, Eugene Kolker · 2013 · Big Data
  81. Costs of Implementing Quality in Research Practice
    O. Meagan Littrell, Claudia Stoeger, Holger Maier, Helmut Fuchs, Martin Hrabě de Angelis, Lisa Ann Cassis, Greg A. Gerhardt, Richard Grondin, Valérie Gailus-Durner · 2019 · Handbook of experimental pharmacology
  82. Mammalian cell culture models
    Theresa M. Freudenrich, Timothy J. Shafer · 2020 · Elsevier eBooks
  83. Knowledge and attitudes among life scientists towards reproducibility within journal articles: a research survey
    Evanthia Kaimaklioti Samota, Robert Davey · 2019 · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  84. Enhancing the quality and transparency of reporting
    2017 · Nature Cell Biology
  85. Learnings from developing an applied data science curricula for undergraduate and graduate students
    Roger H. French, Laura S. Bruckman · 2020 · MRS Advances
  86. Experimental Planning and Execution
    Kevin Mullane, Michael J. Curtis, Michael J. Williams · 2017 · Elsevier eBooks
  87. Ethical and efficient research management: A new challenge for an old problem
    Brunel, Nadège · 2015 · Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
  88. Ticking all the boxes
    2017 · Nature Materials
  89. Microglial Biology in Neuroinflammatory Disease: Pharmaco-industrial Approach to Target Validation
    Thomas Möller, Paul D. Wes, Darı́o Doller · 2014 · Springer eBooks
  90. YAP vs. TAZ: differences in expression revealed through rigorous validation of target-specific monoclonal antibodies
    Katherine Crosby, Antony W. Wood, Jessica Simendinger, Christopher Grange, Lauren Carr, Katrina Costa-Grant, Caitlin J. Roller, Roberto D. Polakiewicz · 2020 · Journal of Histotechnology
  91. From Ice Cores to Dinosaurs: Curation Behaviors of Physical Collections Managers
    Bradley Wade Bishop, Sidney Wanda Taylor Gavel, Emily Grace Chapin, Sarah Whitcher Kansa, Andrea Thomer, Sarah Ramdeen · 2023 · Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology
  92. Reliability of the agar based method to assess the production of degradative enzymes in clinical isolates ofCandida albicans
    Paula Tamião Arantes, Paula Volpato Sanitá, Carolina Santezi, Camila de Oliveira Barbeiro, Bárbara Donadon Reina, Carlos Eduardo Vergani, Lívia Nordi Dovigo · 2015 · Medical Mycology
  93. Issues of aquatic experimentation in research on marine finfish larval production in Europe and North America
    Ove Nicolaisen · 2017 · Reviews in Aquaculture
  94. Enhancing reporting standards
    2018 · Nature Climate Change
  95. A checklist for our community
    2018 · Nature Ecology & Evolution
  96. Introducing editorial changes
    2015 · Nature Materials
  97. Ethics in Academic Surgery
    Charles W. Kimbrough, Timothy Michael Pawlik · 2019 · Springer eBooks
  98. FAIR data for optical tweezers experiments
    Matthew T. J. Halma, Sowmiyaa Kumar, Jan van Eck, Sanne Abeln, Alexander J. Gates, Gijs J. L. Wuite · 2025 · Biophysical Journal
  99. The test of time and editorial responsibility
    C. Glenn Begley · 2013 · Pigment Cell & Melanoma Research
  100. A Semi-Automated Workflow Solution for Data Set Publication
    Suresh K. Santhana Vannan, T. Beaty, Robert B. Cook, Daine Wright, Ranjeet Devarakonda, Yaxing Wei, Leslie A. Hook, Benjamin McMurry · 2016 · ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information