Announcement: Reducing our irreproducibility

Experimental Design and Statistical Analysis of Threshold Studies

Lovell, D. P. (2016) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-801663-3.00009-1 · Cited by 1

Statistical and other methodological issues in the production of reliable experimental endodontic research and why they matter

Brunette, D. M. (2016) · Endodontic Topics · doi:10.1111/etp.12097 · Cited by 1

New forms of checks and balances are needed to improve research integrity

Iorns, E. J., & Chong, C. (2014) · F1000Research · doi:10.12688/f1000research.3980 · Cited by 1

Publishing the data behind the data (Show me yours, I'll show you mine)

Leng, G. (2014) · Physiological Reports · doi:10.14814/phy2.12186 · Cited by 1

Editorial: Reproducibility in Research: A Cautionary Tale and Lessons Not Learned

Schönbrunn, A. (2015) · Molecular Endocrinology · doi:10.1210/me.2015-1209 · Cited by 1

Accesibilidad a los datos de investigación en salud pública: eficiencia y reproducibilidad versus confidencialidad

Martínez‐Beneito, M. A., & Zurriaga, Ó. (2015) · Gaceta Sanitaria · doi:10.1016/j.gaceta.2015.04.010

Zellkultur-Qualitätsmanagement — Kontrolle der biologischen Variabilität

Irelan, J., Schwengberg, S., & Ketterlinus, R. (2014) · BIOspektrum · doi:10.1007/s12268-014-0444-z

Algunos aspectos del artículo científico en la Revista Peruana de Biología

Romero, L. (2015) · Revista Peruana de Biología · doi:10.15381/rpb.v22i3.11431

Comparative Politics and Area Specialization: The Hidden Costs of Analytic Transparency

Yom, S. (2016) · Chinese Political Science Review · doi:10.1007/s41111-016-0034-y

A Systematic Approach to Increase Reproducibility in Simulation Studies

Wu, X., & Rai, S. N. (2017) · International Journal of Clinical Biostatistics and Biometrics · doi:10.23937/2469-5831/1510012

Regarding “Lifelong limb preservation: A patient-centered description of lower extremity arterial reconstruction outcomes”

Kuo, P.-L., Nejim, B. J., & Malas, M. B. (2018) · Journal of Vascular Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2017.12.025

How Quality Can Improve Reproducibility

Lanati, A. (2018) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-76750-5_2

Ensuring Reproducible Simulations on Heterogeneous Computing Environments for Social Simulation

Harada, T., & Murata, T. (2018) · Transactions of the Institute of Systems Control and Information Engineers · doi:10.5687/iscie.31.37

Understanding Replication: Trust But Verify

Suter, W. N., & Suter, P. M. (2019) · Home Health Care Management & Practice · doi:10.1177/1084822319850501 · Cited by 1

Assessing the statistical reporting quality in high-impact factor urology journalsPreprint

Dai, S., Xu, H. W., Li, B., Zhang, J., & Zhou, X. (2020) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2020.03.19.998765

Considerations of sample size and power calculations given a range of analytical scenariosPreprint

Carter, A. R., Tilling, K. M., & Munafo, M. R. (2021) · PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/tcqrn

Sexual dimorphism in Athene cunicularia: are visual cues clues?

Santos, E. G., Depollo, L. C., Machado, R. B., & Wiederhecker, H. C. (2022) · Ornithology Research · doi:10.1007/s43388-022-00080-7

Faculty Opinions recommendation of Animal models of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy: A machine-assisted systematic review and meta-analysis.

Farquhar-Smith, P. W., & Gordon-Williams, R. (2020) · Faculty Opinions – Post-Publication Peer Review of the Biomedical Literature · doi:10.3410/f.735799554.793571725

Faculty Opinions recommendation of How to measure and evaluate binding affinities.

Leonard, T. A. (2020) · Faculty Opinions – Post-Publication Peer Review of the Biomedical Literature · doi:10.3410/f.738447994.793578071

Peer Review #3 of "Assessing the reproducibility of discriminant function analyses (v0.1)"

(2015) · PeerJ · doi:10.7287/peerj.1137v0.1/reviews/3

Peer Review #1 of "Assessing the reproducibility of discriminant function analyses (v0.1)"

(2015) · PeerJ · doi:10.7287/peerj.1137v0.1/reviews/1

Faculty Opinions recommendation of How to measure and evaluate binding affinities.

Schuck, P., & Zhao, H. (2020) · Faculty Opinions – Post-Publication Peer Review of the Biomedical Literature · doi:10.3410/f.738447994.793578547

Research design

Peacock, J. L., & Peacock, P. J. (2020) · doi:10.1093/med/9780198743583.003.0002

Peer Review #2 of "Assessing the reproducibility of discriminant function analyses (v0.2)"

(2015) · PeerJ · doi:10.7287/peerj.1137v0.2/reviews/2

Reproducibility

Boylan, J. E. (2015) · IMA Journal of Management Mathematics · doi:10.1093/imaman/dpv033

Peer Review #2 of "Assessing the reproducibility of discriminant function analyses (v0.1)"

(2015) · PeerJ · doi:10.7287/peerj.1137v0.1/reviews/2

[PhD Dissertation] Good Research PracticesPreprint

Sarafoglou, A. (2022) · PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/7aj5h

How to Mitigate Unintentional Misconduct with Samples and Data in Biorepositories

Simeon‐Dubach, D., & Kozlakidis, Z. (2022) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-99680-2_46

Reporting and justification of sample size in translational chronic variable stress procedures: A systematic reviewPreprint

Jordan, C. Y., Romanò, N., & Menzies, J. (2024) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2024.09.26.615121

Revisiting Tumor Mutational Burden Cutoff: Multi-Study Replicability in ImmunotherapyPreprint

Jaljuli, I., Whiting, K. A., E, E. R. P., & Qin, L. (2025) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2025.01.02.631104

From ice cores to dinosaurs: physical collections managers’ research data curation perceptions and behaviors

Bishop, B. W., Fox, J., Gavel, S. W. T., Chapin, E. G., & Kansa, S. W. (2025) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0317070

Navigating the Gray Areas of Scientific Work

Antes, A. L. (2015) · Emerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks · doi:10.1108/978-1-68123-133-420251010

Additional file 3 of Temporospatial shifts within commercial laboratory mouse gut microbiota impact experimental reproducibility

Mandal, R. K., Denny, J. E., Waide, M. L., Li, Q., Bhutiani, N., Anderson, C. D., Baby, B. V., Jala, V. R., Egilmez, N. K., & Schmidt, N. W. (2020) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.12610025

Figure 74 In Hidden Diversity In Deep-Water Bandfishes: Review Of Owstonia With Descriptions Of Twenty-One New Species (Teleostei: Cepolidae: Owstoniinae)

Smith‐Vaniz, W. F., & Johnson, D. (2016) · INFM-OAR (INFN Catania) · doi:10.5281/zenodo.165384

Additional file 1 of Comparing quality of reporting between preprints and peer-reviewed articles in the biomedical literature

Carneiro, C. F. D., Queiroz, V. G. S., Moulin, T. C., Carvalho, C. A. M., Haas, C. B., Rayêe, D., Henshall, D. E., De‐Souza, E. A., Amorim, F. E., Boos, F. Z., et al. (2020) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.13310563

Additional file 1 of Temporospatial shifts within commercial laboratory mouse gut microbiota impact experimental reproducibility

Mandal, R. K., Denny, J. E., Waide, M. L., Li, Q., Bhutiani, N., Anderson, C. D., Baby, B. V., Jala, V. R., Egilmez, N. K., & Schmidt, N. W. (2020) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.12610019

Additional file 4 of Comparing quality of reporting between preprints and peer-reviewed articles in the biomedical literature

Carneiro, C. F. D., Queiroz, V. G. S., Moulin, T. C., Carvalho, C. A. M., Haas, C. B., Rayêe, D., Henshall, D. E., De‐Souza, E. A., Amorim, F. E., Boos, F. Z., et al. (2020) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.13310584

Additional file 2 of Temporospatial shifts within commercial laboratory mouse gut microbiota impact experimental reproducibility

Mandal, R. K., Denny, J. E., Waide, M. L., Li, Q., Bhutiani, N., Anderson, C. D., Baby, B. V., Jala, V. R., Egilmez, N. K., & Schmidt, N. W. (2020) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.12610022

The Male Default Prevails in Biomedical Research: Sex Inclusion in Nature (2025)Preprint

Swift‐Gallant, A., Galea, L. A. M., & Cahill, L. S. (2026) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.64898/2026.03.03.709344

Open Context in a Changing Context: Data Publishing, Interoperability and Governance

Kansa, E. C., & Kansa, S. W. (2026) · Internet Archaeology · doi:10.11141/ia.71.3

Étude du microbiote intestinal lié à l'hôte par métagénomique quantitative orientée clinique : relation phénotype – inflammation – microbiote dans la recto-colite hémorragique

Maziers, N. (2020) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/e26ca2dcz0988z4fbfz8842zd84239740682

The male default prevails in biomedical research: sex inclusion in Nature (2025)

Swift‐Gallant, A., Galea, L. A. M., & Cahill, L. S. (2026) · Biology of Sex Differences · doi:10.1186/s13293-026-00947-0 · Cited by 1

Epistemic oligarchisation: exploring capture and concentration through science reform

Ulpts, S., Bartscherer, S. F., Penders, B., & Nelson, N. C. (2026) · Science as Culture · doi:10.1080/09505431.2026.2702917

Reality check on reproducibility

(2016) · Nature · doi:10.1038/533437a · Cited by 125

Reproducibility

Boylan, J. E. (2016) · Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University)

Journals should drive data reproducibility

Santori, G. (2016) · Nature · doi:10.1038/535355b · Cited by 20

Trustworthy data underpin reproducible research

Milton, M. J. T., & Possolo, A. M. (2020) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/s41567-019-0780-5 · Cited by 26

What Can Journals Do to Increase the Reliability of Scientific Research?

Lee, W. R. (2020) · Practical Radiation Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.prro.2020.03.001