Cited by 52Ethics in Clinical ResearchEthics and bioethics in healthcareBiomedical Ethics and Regulation

Family matters

Open access
Hudson, Kathy L., Collins, Francis S.·2013·Nature

Abstract

Kathy L. Hudson and Francis S. Collins discuss how and why the US National Institutes of Health worked with the family of Henrietta Lacks, the unwitting source of the HeLa cell line, to craft an agreement for access to HeLa genome data.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/500141a

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • An agreement was reached by which NIH-funded researchers who sequence HeLa cell lines are expected to deposit the data in a controlled-access database, and applications to study these data are reviewed by a committee that includes members of the Lacks family.

    “An agreement was reached by which NIH-funded researchers who sequence HeLa cell lines are expected to deposit the data in a controlled-access database; applications to study these data are reviewed by a committee that includes members of the Lacks family (64).”
  • The story of Henrietta Lacks, her family, and the creation of HeLa cells has been a catalyst for policy change, including major regulatory changes proposed in the United States for informed consent for biospecimen research.

    “The story has been a catalyst for policy change, including major regulatory changes proposed in the United States surrounding informed consent.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Lin, Z., Owen, A. B., Altman & R. B. Science 305, 183 (2004).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hudson, K. L., & Collins, F. S.
Affiliations
National Institutes of Health (US)
Corresponding author
Hudson, Kathy L.
Venue
Nature
Published
2013-08-07
Volume
500
Issue
7461
Pages
141-142
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W2017183122
Cited by
52
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 8
FWCI
8.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics in Clinical Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Biomedical Ethics and Regulation
Keywords
Henrietta Lacks, HeLa cells, family consent, research ethics, informed consent, biobanking, research data sharing
MeSH terms
Family, HeLa Cells, Humans, National Institutes of Health (U.S.), Specimen Handling, United States, Databases, Genetic, Genetic Privacy, Information Dissemination, Biomedical Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review