Cited by 1,047Advancements in Battery MaterialsAdvanced battery technologies researchAdvanced Battery Technologies Research

The rechargeable revolution: a better battery

Van Noorden, Richard·2014·Nature

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/507026a

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Van Noorden, R.
Venue
Nature
Published
2014-03-05
Volume
507
Issue
7490
Pages
26-28
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W1971072083
Cited by
1,047
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 40 · 2025: 71 · 2024: 70 · 2023: 67 · 2022: 92 · 2021: 77 · 2020: 112 · 2019: 77 · 2018: 106 · 2017: 113 · 2016: 99 · 2015: 95 · 2014: 27
Type
other
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advancements in Battery Materials
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advanced battery technologies research
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Advanced Battery Technologies Research
Keywords
rechargeable batteries, battery chemistry, battery cost reduction, battery capacity, energy storage

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review