Cited by 157Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model OrganismsScientific Computing and Data ManagementPhilosophy and History of Science

A long journey to reproducible results

Open access
Lithgow, Gordon J., Driscoll, Monica, Phillips, Patrick·2017·Nature

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/548387a

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lithgow, G. J., Driscoll, M., & Phillips, P.
Affiliations
  • Buck Institute for Research on Aging (US)
  • Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
  • University of Oregon (US)
Corresponding author
Lithgow, Gordon J.
Venue
Nature
Published
2017-08
Volume
548
Issue
7668
Pages
387-388
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W2747311934
Cited by
157
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 4 · 2015: 1
FWCI
9.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Aging (R01AG029631, U01AG045829, U01AG045864, U24AG056052)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Aging › Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Scientific Computing and Data Management
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Philosophy and History of Science
Keywords
reproducibility, replication study, Caenorhabditis elegans, scientific rigor

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review