The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Weak Peristalsis in Esophageal Pressure Topography: Classification and Association With Dysphagia
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVES: Esophageal manometry is frequently used to assess for weak peristalsis. Although commonly used clinically, there are currently no validated metrics of weak peristalsis in high-resolution esophageal pressure topography (EPT). This study aimed to develop a classification of weak peristalsis in EPT based on a comparative analysis of control subjects and patients with unexplained non-obstructive dysphagia. METHODS: High-resolution esophageal pressure topography (high-resolution impedance manometry) studies were carried out in 16 control subjects to verify EPT features associated with incomplete bolus transit (IBT). The technique of superimposing EPT plots in a computer simulation was used to derive normal limits of peristaltic integrity in EPT in another 75 control subjects. The occurrence of critical EPT defects was then compared between control subjects and 113 patients with non-obstructive dysphagia identified from a large clinical series. RESULTS: IBT occurred with failed peristalsis or with breaks in the 20 mm Hg isobaric contour occurring at the proximal or distal pressure troughs in EPT plots. The normal range for isobaric contour breaks was 0-20% for large (>5 cm) and 0-30% for small (2-5 cm) breaks, with both occurring significantly more frequently in dysphagic patients. Failed peristalsis was not more frequent in dysphagic patients. CONCLUSIONS: A classification of weak peristalsis adapted to EPT is proposed based on the occurrence of breaks in the 20 mm Hg isobaric contour wherein weak peristalsis with large breaks is defined by those occurring with >20% of swallows and weak peristalsis with small breaks defined by those occurring with >30% of swallows.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Esophageal motility disorders on high‐resolution manometry: Chicago classification version 4.0©
Yadlapati, R., Kahrilas, P. J., Fox, M. R., Bredenoord, A. J., Prakash Gyawali, C., Roman, S., Babaei, A., Mittal, R. K., Rommel, N., Savarino, E., et al. (2021) · Neurogastroenterology & Motility · doi:10.1111/nmo.14058 · Cited by 1,080
Self-citationFikree, A., Aziz, Q., & Sifrim, D. (2017) · Neurogastroenterology & Motility · doi:10.1111/nmo.13029 · Cited by 30
Metadata
- Authors
- Roman, S., Lin, Z., Kwiatek, M. A., Pandolfino, J. E., & Kahrilas, P. J.
- Venue
- American Journal of Gastroenterology
- Published
- 2011-02
- Volume
- 106
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 349-356
- ISSN
- 0002-9270 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2025801524
- Cited by
- 194
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 46.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Weak Peristalsis in Esophageal Pressure Topography: Classification and Association With Dysphagia. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/ajg.2010.384
- The paper
- Roman, S., Lin, Z., Kwiatek, M. A., Pandolfino, J. E., & Kahrilas, P. J. (2011). Weak Peristalsis in Esophageal Pressure Topography: Classification and Association With Dysphagia. American Journal of Gastroenterology. https://doi.org/10.1038/ajg.2010.384
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.