The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The clinical course of bone metastases from breast cancer
Open accessAbstract
All patients with carcinoma of the breast seen in this Unit since 1970 were reviewed to study the incidence, prognosis, morbidity and response to treatment of bone metastases. The biological characteristics of the primary tumour were compared in patients relapsing first in bone or liver. Sixty-nine percent of patients dying with breast cancer had bone metastases and bone was the commonest site of first distant relapse. Bone relapse was more common in receptor positive or well differentiated (grade 1) tumours. The median survival was 24 months in those with disease apparently confined to the skeleton compared with 3 months after first relapse in liver. Ten percent of patients with breast cancer developed hypercalcaemia. All had metastatic disease and 85% had widespread skeletal involvement. Fifteen percent of patients with disease confined to the skeleton developed hypercalcaemia. The response in bone to primary endocrine therapy, and chemotherapy, was apparently less than the overall response achieved. A large proportion had apparently static disease reflecting the insensitivity of the UICC assessment criteria. The duration of survival in these patients was similar to responding patients, suggesting a tumour response may occur in the absence of discernable radiological evidence of healing.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bloom, H. J. G., & Richardson, W. W. (1957) · British Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1038/bjc.1957.43 · Cited by 2,925
Assessment of response to therapy in advanced breast cancer
Hayward, J. L., Carbone, P. P., Heusen, J. C., Kumaoka, S., Segaloff, A., & Rubens, R. D. (1977) · British Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1038/bjc.1977.42 · Cited by 705
Self-citationBone metastases and breast cancer
Coleman, R. E., & Rubens, R. D. (1985) · Cancer Treatment Reviews · doi:10.1016/0305-7372(85)90008-8 · Cited by 97
Self-citationStewart, J. F., King, R. J. B., Hayward, J., & Rubens, R. D. (1982) · Breast Cancer Research and Treatment · doi:10.1007/bf01806937 · Cited by 41
Self-citation
Cited by
Roodman, G. D. (2004) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmra030831 · Cited by 2,755
Metastatic bone disease: clinical features, pathophysiology and treatment strategies
Coleman, R. E. (2001) · Cancer Treatment Reviews · doi:10.1053/ctrv.2000.0210 · Cited by 1,920
Self-citationCox, T. R., Rumney, R. M. H., Schoof, E. M., Perryman, L., Høye, A. M., Agrawal, A., Bird, D., Latif, N. A., Forrest, H., Evans, H. R., et al. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14492 · Cited by 482
RetractedInterleukin-6 Interweaves the Bone Marrow Microenvironment, Bone Loss, and Multiple Myeloma
Harmer, D., Falank, C., & Reagan, M. R. (2019) · Frontiers in Endocrinology · doi:10.3389/fendo.2018.00788 · Cited by 307
Biology of Osteoclast Activation in Cancer
Roodman, G. D. (2001) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2001.19.15.3562 · Cited by 306
Metadata
- Authors
- Coleman, R., & Rubens, R.
- Venue
- British Journal of Cancer
- Published
- 1987-01
- Volume
- 55
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 61-66
- ISSN
- 0007-0920 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-1827
- OpenAlex
- W2054351138
- Cited by
- 1,084
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 3.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The clinical course of bone metastases from breast cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/bjc.1987.13
- The paper
- Coleman, R., & Rubens, R. (1987). The clinical course of bone metastases from breast cancer. British Journal of Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.1987.13
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.