Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 280

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Antibody directed enzymes revive anti-cancer prodrugs concept

Open access
Bagshawe, KD·1987·British Journal of Cancer

Abstract

Within a few years of the beginnings of cancer chemotherapy anticancer prodrugs were being synthesised. A series of azo mustards was designed and produced by Ross and Warwick (1955) at the Chester Beatty Research Institute so that under in vivo conditions the azo link would be cleaved by enzymes and agents with powerful alkylating activity would be produced. Other latent compounds followed with a view to activation by enzyme species thought to be present in greater concentration in certain types of cancer than in normal tissues (Connors, 1978; Carl et al., 1980). Unfortunately, a favourable distribution of activating enzymes was not found in human cancers and the prodrugs did not achieve the selective toxicity that was sought. Yet the approach was not fruitless. Cyclophosphamide was developed as an agent that would be activated enzymatically and although this proved to occur mainly in the liver by the cytochrome P-450 system its place in cancer chemotherapy needs no emphasis. More interesting in the present context was the observation of Connors and others (Connors & Melzack, 1971; Cobb et al., 1969) that one of the compounds produced at the Chester Beatty (2,4-dinitro-5-ethyleneminobenzamide), known as CB 1954, had a profound effect on growth of the Walker rat carcinoma, both in vivo and in culture, whilst it had little or no effect on other cancers. This was surprising since it was a mono-functional alkylating agent which should have been relatively inert and the result implied that the Walker carcinoma cells converted CB 1954 to a potent cytotoxic agent. Thus the principle and potential benefits of drug activation at the site of a cancer was established, although the active product was not known. Recently, Roberts et al. (1986) have shown that CB 1954 is converted in Walker carcinoma cells, presumably by enzymatic action, to a difunctional agent resulting in DNA-DNA interstrand links. Whereas enzymes do not appear to be disposed in a consistent and exploitable fashion in human tumours some of their macromolecules viewed as antigenic determinants have shown a more favourable distribution. Even though tumour specific antigens have proved elusive, some antigens have been found to be present in significantly greater concentrations in tumours than in normal tissues of the host. Such antigens when they are expressed on the cell membrane or secreted into tumour extra-cellular fluid lend themselves to the role of targets for antibodies. Monoclonal antibodies armed with drugs, toxins or radioactive isotopes …

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/bjc.1987.237

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 6 references

Cited by

See all 280

Metadata

Authors
Bagshawe, K.
Venue
British Journal of Cancer
Published
1987-11
Volume
56
Issue
5
Pages
531-532
ISSN
  • 0007-0920 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-1827
OpenAlex
W1981793850
Cited by
280
References
6
FWCI
5.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Antibody directed enzymes revive anti-cancer prodrugs concept. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/bjc.1987.237
The paper
Bagshawe, K. (1987). Antibody directed enzymes revive anti-cancer prodrugs concept. British Journal of Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.1987.237

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.