Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 185

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

ANTI-IDIOTYPIC AND NON-ANTI-INDIOTYPIC ANTIBODIES TO OKT3 ARISING DESPITE INTENSE IMMUNOSUPPRESSION

Jaffers, Gregory J., Fuller, Thomas C., Cosimi, A. Benedict, Russell, Paul S., Winn, Henry J., Colvin, Robert B.·1986·Transplantation

Abstract

The frequency, timing, and specificity of the humoral antibody response to a murine monoclonal antibody (OKT3, IgG2a) were measured in 21 consecutive renal allograft recipients. These patients received i.v. OKT3, 1-5 mg/day for 10-20 days as treatment for acute graft rejection. Maintenance immunosuppression consisted of azathioprine and corticosteroids. Using three different assays, an antibody response was detected in 75% of the 20 patients with adequate samples. The ELISA assay of the overall IgM and IgG reactivity to OKT3 revealed that IgM anti-OKT3 appeared in 65% and IgG anti-OKT3 in 50% of the patients, reaching a peak 20-33 days after the last dose of OKT3. The IgM preceeded the IgG in most cases (P less than 0.02) and in 8 cases was detected during therapy. One patient had high levels of IgM anti-OKT3 before therapy, yet responded normally to OKT3. Interference with the therapeutic effectiveness was evident in one patient who developed IgG antibodies during therapy. His serum blocked the binding of F-OKT3 to normal lymphocytes in the presence of normal BALB/c serum. The blocking assay, done by flow cytometry, measured anti-idiotypic (Id) reactivity since the sera did not affect the binding of OKT8 (another IgG2a) or anti-Leu4 (another anti-T3), and the blocking activity remained after affinity absorption with normal mouse IgG. Using this assay, 60% of the patients made an anti-Id response. One made only anti-Id, and several had anti-Id at times when other reactivities were undetectable. Antibodies to non-idiotypic, presumably isotypic, determinants represented on OKT8 occurred in only 44%, while other reactivity (OKT4; IgG2bK) was less common (12%) and weaker. While no adverse allergic reactions occurred in this group of patients, the anti-Id antibodies, which are a prominent feature of the immune response to this and probably other monoclonal antibodies, can block their therapeutic effectiveness and can arise despite intense immunosuppression. This response may require the use of different idiotypes for prolonged or repeated courses of therapy and may be the major obstacle to the use of human monoclonal antibodies.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00007890-198605000-00004

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 185

Metadata

Authors
Jaffers, G. J., Fuller, T. C., Cosimi, A. B., Russell, P. S., Winn, H. J., & Colvin, R. B.
Venue
Transplantation
Published
1986-05
Volume
41
Issue
5
Pages
572-578
ISSN
0041-1337 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W147473274
Cited by
185
References
0
FWCI
13.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: ANTI-IDIOTYPIC AND NON-ANTI-INDIOTYPIC ANTIBODIES TO OKT3 ARISING DESPITE INTENSE IMMUNOSUPPRESSION. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/00007890-198605000-00004
The paper
Jaffers, G. J., Fuller, T. C., Cosimi, A. B., Russell, P. S., Winn, H. J., & Colvin, R. B. (1986). ANTI-IDIOTYPIC AND NON-ANTI-INDIOTYPIC ANTIBODIES TO OKT3 ARISING DESPITE INTENSE IMMUNOSUPPRESSION. Transplantation. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007890-198605000-00004

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.