The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Chemosensitivity testing of human lung cancer cell lines using the MTT assay
Open accessAbstract
Thirty human lung cancer cell lines were tested for chemosensitivity using the semi-automated, non-clonogenic MTT assay. The tumour cell lines came from three major categories of patients: untreated small cell lung cancer (SCLC); SCLC relapsing on chemotherapy; and non-SCLC predominantly from untreated patients. From these data IC50 values were derived for each drug in each cell line. While some inter-experimental variability was observed, the rank order of chemosensitivity of each cell line within this panel was significantly correlated between experiments. These results show that tumour cell lines derived from untreated small cell lung cancer patients were the most chemosensitive for adriamycin, melphalan, vincristine and VP16 compared to the other cell types. In addition, untreated SCLC was more sensitive than non-SCLC to BCNU and cis-platin, while vincristine was the only drug to which treated SCLC was more sensitive compared to the non-SCLC lines. In contrast, no significant differences between the lung cancer types were observed for vinblastine. Thus, this panel of lung cancer cells exhibited a drug sensitivity profile paralleling that observed in clinical practice. These results suggest that this lung cancer cell line panel in combination with a relatively simple but reproducible chemosensitivity assay, such as the MTT assay, has potential for the testing of drug combinations and evaluating new anti-cancer agents in vitro.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Dual AO/EB Staining to Detect Apoptosis in Osteosarcoma Cells Compared with Flow Cytometry
Liu, K., Liu, P.-C., Liu, R., & Wu, X. (2015) · Medical Science Monitor Basic Research · doi:10.12659/msmbr.893327 · Cited by 770
Rapid screening of potential autophagic inductor agents using mammalian cell lines
Martins, W. K., Severino, D., Souza, C., Stolf, B. S., & Baptista, M. S. (2013) · Biotechnology Journal · doi:10.1002/biot.201200306 · Cited by 33
Metadata
- Authors
- Carmichael, J., Mitchell, J., DeGraff, W., Gamson, J., Gazdar, A., Johnson, B., Glatstein, E., & Minna, J.
- Venue
- British Journal of Cancer
- Published
- 1988-12
- Volume
- 57
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 540-547
- ISSN
- 0007-0920 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-1827
- OpenAlex
- W2052837225
- Cited by
- 212
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Chemosensitivity testing of human lung cancer cell lines using the MTT assay. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/bjc.1988.125
- The paper
- Carmichael, J., Mitchell, J., DeGraff, W., Gamson, J., Gazdar, A., Johnson, B., Glatstein, E., & Minna, J. (1988). Chemosensitivity testing of human lung cancer cell lines using the MTT assay. British Journal of Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.1988.125
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.