Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 203

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

An overview of prognostic factors in small cell lung cancer: A report from the Subcommittee for the Management of Lung Cancer of the United Kingdom Coordinating Committee on Cancer Research

Open access
A report from the Subcommittee for the Management of Lung Cancer of the United Kingdom Coordinating Committee on Cancer Research, Rawson, NSB, Peto, J·1990·British Journal of Cancer

Abstract

Several studies of small cell lung cancer (SCLC) treatments have been performed in the United Kingdom. In some, prognostic factor analyses were carried out but the results were not entirely consistent. The Lung Cancer Subcommittee of the United Kingdom Coordinating Committee on Cancer Research (UKCCCR) consequently initiated an overview of these studies with the aim of identifying the important prognostic factors using a large number of patients. Information on almost 4,000 patients was available, but it was necessary to perform analyses on smaller subsets because the variables recorded in individual studies were inconsistent. A number of variables contributed significantly to the prediction of likely survival over the 6 months after starting treatment, but performance status (PS), alkaline phosphatase (AlkP) and disease stage were shown to be the most important; aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) may also be useful. A prognostic index was devised for this initial period and validated using independent data. For patients who survived the first 6 months, the pre-treatment variables important for prognosis in the 6-24 month period were stage, PS and plasma sodium (Na). The Subcommittee recommends that performance status, disease stage, AlkP, Na, AST and LDH should be measured in all future SCLC studies to assist comparisons between studies and possibly the selection of patients for different treatment strategies. The additional recording of five other variables would allow a more definitive overview to be performed at some future date.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/bjc.1990.133

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 203

Metadata

Authors
A report from the Subcommittee for the Management of Lung Cancer of the United Kingdom Coordinating Committee on Cancer Research, Rawson, N., & Peto, J.
Venue
British Journal of Cancer
Published
1990-04-01
Volume
61
Issue
4
Pages
597-604
ISSN
  • 0007-0920 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-1827
OpenAlex
W296967391
Cited by
203
References
0
FWCI
3.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An overview of prognostic factors in small cell lung cancer: A report from the Subcommittee for the Management of Lung Cancer of the United Kingdom Coordinating Committee on Cancer Research. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/bjc.1990.133
The paper
A report from the Subcommittee for the Management of Lung Cancer of the United Kingdom Coordinating Committee on Cancer Research, Rawson, N., & Peto, J. (1990). An overview of prognostic factors in small cell lung cancer: A report from the Subcommittee for the Management of Lung Cancer of the United Kingdom Coordinating Committee on Cancer Research. British Journal of Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.1990.133

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.