Cited by 263Photodynamic Therapy Research StudiesPorphyrin Metabolism and DisordersPorphyrin and Phthalocyanine Chemistry

Oral versus intravenous administration of 5-aminolaevulinic acid for photodynamic therapy

Open access
Loh, CS, MacRobert, AJ, Bedwell, J, Regula, J, Krasner, N, Bown, SG·1993·British Journal of Cancer

Abstract

Endogenously synthesised protoporphyrin IX (PpIX) following the administration of 5-amino-laevulinic acid (ALA) is an effective photosensitiser for photodynamic therapy (PDT). Following intravenous administration, PpIX accumulates predominantly in mucosa of hollow viscera and on light exposure, mucosal ablation results with relative sparing of the submucosa and muscularis layers. Oral administration is effective with ALA in contrast to conventional exogenous photosensitisers such as haematoporphyrin derivative and phthalocyanines. Oral administration of ALA is also simpler, safer, cheaper and more acceptable to patients. We studied the porphyrin sensitisation kinetics profile in the stomach, colon and bladder in normal rats following enterally and parenterally administered ALA using microscopic fluorescence photometric studies of frozen tissue sections. Mucosal cells in all three organs exhibit higher fluorescence levels as compared with underlying smooth muscle following both intravenous and oral administration. Peak concentration were seen 4 h after sensitisation at the highest doses used (200 mg kg-1 i.v., 400 mg kg-1 oral), and slightly earlier with lower doses. The temporal kinetics of both routes of administration were similar although a higher oral dose was required to achieve the same tissue concentration of PpIX. The highest level of fluorescence was achieved in the gastric mucosa and in decreasing levels, colonic and bladder mucosa. A similar degree of mucosal selectivity was achieved in each organ with each route of administration but an oral dose in excess of 40 mg kg-1 was required to achieve measurable PpIX sensitisation. In a pilot clinical study, two patients with inoperable rectal adenocarcinomas were given 30 mg kg-1 and one patient with sigmoid colon carcinoma was given 60 mg kg-1 ALA orally. Serial biopsies of normal and tumour areas were taken over the subsequent 24 h. Fluorescence microscopy of these specimens showed maximum accumulation of PpIX 4 to 6 h after administration of 30 mg kg-1 ALA. There was greater PpIX accumulation in tumour than adjacent normal mucosa in two patients. Preferential PpIX accumulation in tumour was greater in the patient receiving 60 mg kg-1 ALA.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/bjc.1993.284

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Although the oral route is preferred by patients, the bioavailability of oral ALA is generally lower than after intravenous administration owing to presystemic drug elimination.

    “Although this route is preferred by patients, the bioavailability of oral ALA is generally lower then after intravenous administration owing to presystemic drug elimination [53].”

    From Aminolevulinic Acid (ALA) as a Prodrug in Photodynamic Therapy of Cancer (2011) · cites this paper as [53]

    The discussion (p. 49) says oral drug bioavailability is usually lower than intravenous bioavailability because of presystemic elimination. The conclusion says first-pass metabolism requires a higher oral ALA dose to achieve the same photosensitisation. The paper describes oral administration as simple and suitable for self-administration, but does not report that patients prefer it. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Loh, C., MacRobert, A., Bedwell, J., Regula, J., Krasner, N., & Bown, S.
Affiliations
University College London (GB)
Venue
British Journal of Cancer
Published
1993-07
Volume
68
Issue
1
Pages
41-51
ISSN
  • 0007-0920 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-1827
OpenAlex
W1991767819
Cited by
263
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 4
FWCI
23.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • British Journal of Cancer (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Photodynamic Therapy Research Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Porphyrin Metabolism and Disorders
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Porphyrin and Phthalocyanine Chemistry
Keywords
5-aminolevulinic acid, photodynamic therapy, protoporphyrin IX, oral administration, intravenous administration, gastric mucosa, colonic mucosa, urothelium, rectal adenocarcinoma, sigmoid colon cancer, fluorescence microscopy
MeSH terms
Adenocarcinoma, Administration, Oral, Aminolevulinic Acid, Animals, Urinary Bladder, Colon, Colonic Neoplasms, Gastric Mucosa, Humans, Injections, Intravenous, Male, Muscle, Smooth, Photochemotherapy, Pilot Projects, Rectal Neoplasms, Spectrometry, Fluorescence, Rats, Wistar, Photosensitizing Agents, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review