The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Intrinsic radiosensitivity and prediction of patient response to radiotherapy for carcinoma of the cervix
Open accessAbstract
The intrinsic radiosensitivity of cervical carcinoma has been measured using a soft agar clonogenic assay. All patients received radical radiotherapy alone with a minimum of 2 years post-treatment follow-up. Only women with stage I, II and III disease were included in the analysis. Values for cell surviving fraction at 2 Gy (SF2) were obtained for 88 tumours with an assay success rate of 73%. The 53 patients alive and well at the time of analysis had tumours with a mean SF2 that was significantly lower than the value from the 22 patients with locoregional failure (P < 0.01). Patients with radioresistant tumours (SF2 > 0.40, the median) had a significantly lower 3 year survival level than those with sensitive tumours (SF2 < or = 0.40) (P = 0.002). Also the frequency of local recurrence was higher (P = 0.001) whether these were central (P = 0.009) or peripheral (P = 0.046). Cell surviving fraction at 3.5 Gy was obtained for 46 tumours and the 3 year patient survival rate was significantly higher for those with SF3.5 values less than the median (P = 0.043). There was, however, no difference in the level of local recurrence (P = 0.24). The ability to grow in culture was not associated with significantly poorer patient survival (P = 0.56) or failure to control the primary disease (P = 0.17). While high colony forming efficiencies were associated with an increased rate of local recurrence (P = 0.029) they did not predict for overall patient survival (P = 0.32). These data suggest that, for cervical carcinoma treated with radical radiotherapy, intrinsic radiosensitivity is important in determining treatment outcome.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Intratumoral pO2 predicts survival in advanced cancer of the uterine cervix
Höckel, M., Knoop, C., Schlenger, K., Vorndran, B., Bauβnann, E., Mitze, M., Knapstein, P. G., & Vaupel, P. (1993) · Radiotherapy and Oncology · doi:10.1016/0167-8140(93)90025-4 · Cited by 809
Cited by
Strategies to improve radiotherapy with targeted drugs
Begg, A. C., Stewart, F. A., & Vens, C. (2011) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc3007 · Cited by 1,118
Yu, Z., Pestell, T. G., Lisanti, M. P., & Pestell, R. G. (2012) · The International Journal of Biochemistry & Cell Biology · doi:10.1016/j.biocel.2012.08.022 · Cited by 647
Clinical development of new drug–radiotherapy combinations
on behalf of the NCRI CTRad Academia-Pharma Joint Working Group, Sharma, R. A., Plummer, R., Stock, J. K., Greenhalgh, T. A., Ataman, O., Kelly, S., Clay, R., Adams, R. A., Baird, R. D., et al. (2016) · Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1038/nrclinonc.2016.79 · Cited by 320
Krause, M., Dubrovska, A., Linge, A., & Baumann, M. (2017) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2016.02.002 · Cited by 305
A review of human cell radiosensitivity in vitro
Deschavanne, P. J., & Fertil, B. (1996) · International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics · doi:10.1016/0360-3016(95)02029-2 · Cited by 295
Metadata
- Authors
- West, C., Davidson, S., Roberts, S., & Hunter, R.
- Venue
- British Journal of Cancer
- Published
- 1993-10
- Volume
- 68
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 819-823
- ISSN
- 0007-0920 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-1827
- OpenAlex
- W2071387709
- Cited by
- 185
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 17.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Intrinsic radiosensitivity and prediction of patient response to radiotherapy for carcinoma of the cervix. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/bjc.1993.434
- The paper
- West, C., Davidson, S., Roberts, S., & Hunter, R. (1993). Intrinsic radiosensitivity and prediction of patient response to radiotherapy for carcinoma of the cervix. British Journal of Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.1993.434
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.