The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Optimal treatment of adrenocortical carcinoma with mitotane: results in a consecutive series of 96 patients
Open accessAbstract
Mitotane is considered to be the drug of choice for patients with inoperable, recurrent and metastatic adrenocortical carcinoma, although a favourable effect of this drug on survival has never been documented. We evaluated the efficacy of mitotane treatment of 96 patients with adrenocortical carcinoma followed up in our department between 1959 and 1992. Complete tumour resection was the goal of the initial treatment. Mitotane treatment was classified according to serum trough concentrations on maintenance therapy: low (< 14 mg l-1) or high (> or = 14 mg l-1). Total tumour resection was feasible in 47 patients (49%), and subtotal resection was performed in 37 patients (39%). Patients who underwent total tumour resection survived significantly longer than those who did not (P < 0.001). Adjuvant mitotane therapy (n = 11) did not influence survival after total resection. Sixty-two patients were given mitotane treatment at some time during their illness, only 30 of whom reached high maintenance serum levels. Mitotane treatment with high serum levels had an independently favourable influence on patient survival, using univariate (P < 0.01) and multivariate analysis (P = 0.01). Mitotane treatment resulting in low serum levels was tantamount to not giving mitotane at all. We conclude that mitotane treatment in adrenocortical carcinoma is effective only when high serum levels can be achieved.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Luton, J.-P., Cerdas, S., Billaud, L., Thomas, G., Guilhaume, B., Bertagna, X., Laudat, M.-H., Louvel, A., Chapuis, Y., Blondeau, P., et al. (1990) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199004263221705 · Cited by 717
Cited by
Else, T., Kim, A. C., Sabolch, A., Raymond, V. M., Kandathil, A., Caoili, E. M., Jolly, S., Miller, B. S., Giordano, T. J., & Hammer, G. D. (2014) · Endocrine Reviews · doi:10.1210/er.2013-1029 · Cited by 892
Combination Chemotherapy in Advanced Adrenocortical Carcinoma
Fassnacht, M., Terzolo, M., Allolio, B., Baudin, E., Haak, H., Berruti, A., Welin, S., Schade-Brittinger, C., Lacroix, A., Jarzab, B., et al. (2012) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1200966 · Cited by 873
Self-citationAdrenocortical Carcinoma: Clinical Update
Allolio, B., & Fassnacht, M. (2006) · The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1210/jc.2005-2639 · Cited by 775
Fassnacht, M., Johanssen, S., Quinkler, M., Bucsky, P., Willenberg, H. S., Beuschlein, F., Terzolo, M., Mueller, H., Hahner, S., Allolio, B., et al. (2009) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/cncr.24030 · Cited by 695
Icard, P., Goudet, P., Charpenay, C., Andreassian, B., Carnaille, B., Chapuis, Y., Cougard, P., Henry, J., & Proye, C. (2001) · World Journal of Surgery · doi:10.1007/s00268-001-0047-y · Cited by 543
Metadata
- Authors
- Haak, H., Hermans, J., van de Velde, C., Lentjes, E., Goslings, B., Fleuren, G.-J., & Krans, H.
- Venue
- British Journal of Cancer
- Published
- 1994-05
- Volume
- 69
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 947-951
- ISSN
- 0007-0920 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-1827
- OpenAlex
- W2079874148
- Cited by
- 329
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 3.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Optimal treatment of adrenocortical carcinoma with mitotane: results in a consecutive series of 96 patients. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/bjc.1994.183
- The paper
- Haak, H., Hermans, J., van de Velde, C., Lentjes, E., Goslings, B., Fleuren, G.-J., & Krans, H. (1994). Optimal treatment of adrenocortical carcinoma with mitotane: results in a consecutive series of 96 patients. British Journal of Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.1994.183
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.